Live data from Hacker News

We have 4 days to contest KYC being required by internet services

federalregister.gov

361–370 of 395 posts

Re: We have 4 days to contest KYC being required by internet services

#361

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What laws are you talking about? The Internet has grown a lot that’s largely because we have smart politicians and strong institutions. I really think the regulation of the Internet has been amazingly good.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_Online_Piracy_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROTECT_IP_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Counterfeiting_Trade_Agre... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_A... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriot_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM

Yep, all of those need to go the way of the creamitorium!!!! You forgot FISA and CISA though, how'd you do that.

Re: We have 4 days to contest KYC being required by internet services

#362
post #70
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AI is mentioned, but the scope is significantly larger if you read the fulltext.

I'm going to need another intelligence to read the full text. "U.S. IaaS providers and foreign resellers of U.S. IaaS products must exercise reasonable due diligence to ascertain the true identity of any customer or beneficial owner of an Account who claims to be a U.S. person." So at a minimum, everyone's identity is verified by IaaS provider. If you claim to be a non-U.S. person, additional information is collected…

In their definition, everything does, HN included.

Re: We have 4 days to contest KYC being required by internet services

#363
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Legally speaking, internet service providers are infrastructure providers.

Definitely not in this case (unless you're using Digital Ocean as a VPN end point or something). EO 13984 (which is cited as the enabling act) has a narrow definition: (e) The term ‘‘Infrastructure as a Service Product’’ means any product or service offered to a consumer, including complimentary or ‘‘trial’’ offerings, that provides processing, storage, networks, or other fundamental computing resources, and with whi…

That's not a narrow definition.

Re: We have 4 days to contest KYC being required by internet services

#364

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This won't work. Foreign nations have enough skill and resources to pass KYC as a citizen (steal someone's documents, pay a homeless for verification etc). And as I understand, US doesn't have a central citizen database so it is difficult to verify a document.

It's not meant to work.

True that!

Re: We have 4 days to contest KYC being required by internet services

#365
post #21

Skimming through the article, it seems like the extent of this is to require IAAS (Infrastructure) providers to verify the identity of those who are using their services to train AI. It's an attempt to stymie sanctioned or malicious actors, from training AI and especially from hopping between services or using aliases to continue training on their model. It seems a bit benign and I don't understand the parallels othe…

> Is it that it's a slippery slope or perhaps I'm being naïve in regards to the scope? This. Also, it won't stop malicious actors. Setting up a LLC to mask your true identity is cheap and easy. Not to mention that providing a fake identity or pretending your are not a "foreign person" is also cheap and easy.

I'll certainly get one, or two, if this goes through.

Re: We have 4 days to contest KYC being required by internet services

#366

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think this is about preventing sanctioned countries or individuals using US technology we don't want them to have access too (like China not having modern GPUs). That goal seems reasonable though there's always a fear that the law is way broader than the high level intent. Why would it be "an absolute nightmare" if it's so easy to migrate?

That's the stated goal. The actual goal is more likely complete knowledge of any person using IaaS service whether domestic or foreign and what they're up to.

Yeah, mass surveillance.

Re: We have 4 days to contest KYC being required by internet services

#367
post #101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It also looks like it only applies to foreign peoples? That said, I don’t know how you select for only foreigners without collecting identity.

Yeah that's a clever way to avoid having the rules struck down as unconstitutional. In practice though to avoid liability and possibly jail time, providers will have to assume that every customer is a foreigner until they "prove" their US citizenship (by uploading the same ID and other documentation required by foreigners).

It sseems unconstitutional to me. that's just me though.

Re: We have 4 days to contest KYC being required by internet services

#369

For those who didn't know, KYC stands for "know your customer". It's a good idea to spell out abbreviations the first time they're used, especially since the abbreviation itself is not used in the linked article. It's also worth noting that the proposal is about US infrastructure as a service (IaaS) products specifically, not "internet services" in general.

Yeah this is a very industry standard term in banking and anyone in that industry is going to immediately know what you are talking about, but outside of that industry, chances are high that a layman will not

I've studied crypto currency. I know exactly what KYC means.

Re: We have 4 days to contest KYC being required by internet services

#370

For those who didn't know, KYC stands for "know your customer". It's a good idea to spell out abbreviations the first time they're used, especially since the abbreviation itself is not used in the linked article. It's also worth noting that the proposal is about US infrastructure as a service (IaaS) products specifically, not "internet services" in general.

KYC in the context of internet services stands for "violating the 4th Amendment".

Yes! If they put it into the entire internet infrastructure, it's considered a general warrant. Hmm... I thought we did away with those in 1789.
Post reply on HN