Live data from Hacker News

Swedish court rules against Tesla in dispute with postal service over deliveries

reuters.com

341–350 of 409 posts

Re: Swedish court rules against Tesla in dispute with postal service over deliveries

#341

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> don't go down well in Europe. > Exactly. This is about our entire model under threat. And it will be Tesla's Afghanistan. Membership in unions is the norm in Sweden. Unionization rates differ significantly across European countries. While the unionization rate in the Sweden is quite high at 65.2% (as of 2019), it is much lower in Germany at 16.3% and even lower in France at 8.9%. https://www.statista.com/statistic…

I was specifically speaking about the Nordic Model of which I am a member and a citizen. I could have been more clear but by "my" I meant as a citizen of a country participating in the Nordic Model. What the rest of Europe does is up to them. Unions are foundational to our (Scandinavia's) way of life. This fight ends with Tesla either agreeing to our model or losing our entire market.

To put into context, Tesla only employs 120 people in Sweden.

Re: Swedish court rules against Tesla in dispute with postal service over deliveries

#342
post #161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tesla is refusing to sign a collective bargaining agreement which is basically the norm in Sweden. This has been going on for a couple of weeks and garnered a lot of attention in Swedish media and social media. Sweden has a strong tradition of unionization which clashes with 'big American capitalism'. Swedish subreddits have lately had frequent posts with the comment sections filled with comments that more or less in…

The strike has been ongoing for a couple of weeks but in the result of Tesla refusing to negotiate despite five years of attempts from the union. So it’s actually ongoing for +5 year

Good point. Small but important distinction.

Re: Swedish court rules against Tesla in dispute with postal service over deliveries

#343
post #314

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Can you realistically have a vote to stop paying taxes or to smoke weed? This is inevitably going to turn into a quibble about whether representation and/or the electoral college constitutes "true" democracy, so I'm going to head that off by amending my previous comment to be at the state level (rather than the federal level). There's several states that had ballot measures on tax increases and/or marijuana legaliz…

> In those cases it would be strange to characterize the dissenters as not being "forced" into anything, even if it was a collective decision. Okay, I see, but then you could also leave your Union for zero cost. You could leave your US citizenship too, I guess, by moving. But my point is I think forcing is far too strong a word for the union meanings here. Why wouldn't you support this if you benefit from the Swedish…

>Okay, I see, but then you could also leave your Union for zero cost.

Clearly it's not as simple or cheap as "zero cost", otherwise Tesla would have bribed some workers $1000 (or whatever) to defect, rather than hiring a bunch of expensive lawyers.

>But my point is I think forcing is far too strong a word for the union meanings here. Why wouldn't you support this if you benefit from the Swedish model?

Whether you benefit from something is irrelevant to whether it's "forced" or not. I think taxes are a net positive for everyone in society, but I'm under no illusions that everyone's forced to pay it.

Re: Swedish court rules against Tesla in dispute with postal service over deliveries

#344
post #307

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Aggressive American union busting tactics don't go down well in Europe. But... Tesla never even got that far. They just hired some people who apparently wanted the jobs? No one got fired or threatened, no bribes are alleged. It really seems like IF Metall fired first, no?

Tesla has refused to negotiate for over 5 years.

With who though? Not their workers. Can you cite coverage of the "union busting" activities you're talking about?

Re: Swedish court rules against Tesla in dispute with postal service over deliveries

#345
post #114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's a good question almost every major international business struggles with. As far as I know, the usual answers are paying the required bribes quietly and refusing to do business in that culture. The third option, trying to do business without paying bribes, rarely works.

I'll argue a point I don't really agree with, namely that in this case bribes are fair. Coiuntries are sovereign. Foreigners don't decide, that's a key outcome of the thirty years' war. So if you go to X, the polite, proper, non-imperialist thing is to follow accepted custom. Of course, that raises the question of what "accepted custom" means. It's not clear to me that bribing is really accepted in the countries wher…

Then you can for moral reasons refuse to do business there because you don't feel like playing in a crooked game. That in turn might have the effect of improving the world a bit.

Re: Swedish court rules against Tesla in dispute with postal service over deliveries

#346

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The point of the Swedish model is to avoid micro management from the state and instead of mandating work regulations through law businesses and unions can negotiate sector specific agreements that suits the very people and companies that it affects. Businesses and unions are better at knowing the needs of companies and people than what any government is. Not everything has to be achieved through laws. In Sweden we ge…

It's not micro management, it's a major point. Again, it looks like the consensus is that Tesla must accept a collective agreement (content to be left to the parties to negotiate). So why is that not mandated? IMHO, you can't be outraged that Tesla is refusing, or at least trying not to have one, when the law effectively says that they don't have to. The level of reactions against Tesla does not make the system look…

It's actually really simple: nobody is being forced. Tesla doesn't have to accept a collective agreement, they can just pull out of Sweden and nobody would bat an eye. But what they can't do is to expect Swedes to work as though they are Americans on American soil. It's Tesla that is the guest here, and as a guest you abide by the customs of your host. Don't like it? Don't visit.

Re: Swedish court rules against Tesla in dispute with postal service over deliveries

#347
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It will affect you either way. It is difficult to tell exactly how but a union win will embolden the unions in Sweden general, and it is not certain that is an all out win. I realize that embolden is not a neutral word, but what is on the other side of the balance scale is investments in new jobs in Sweden vs elsewhere. Perhaps the balance will still be a net benefit to Sweden but we will see. I would have an easier…

The fact that it will affect me either way is kind of my point in saying this is not just IF Metall vs Tesla. I consider a union win to be the best outcome here.

And for that reason it is the most likely outcome too. 'When in Rome...' Tesla has a lot to lose here: Norway, Sweden and to a lesser extent Denmark and Finland are early adopters and Tesla has large market share there. If they turn those countries against them it will have repercussions all over Europe. I'm in NL and have already heard people mention this conflict here and how it affects their view of Tesla as a brand and I think that's not unique.

Pick your battles and all that.

Re: Swedish court rules against Tesla in dispute with postal service over deliveries

#348
post #280

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why? They pay taxes. They pay shipping. Why do you also have to pay extortion fees?

> extortion fees They have options of course: 1) Stop doing business in Sweden. 2) Sign a collective labor agreement that ensure worker's rights just as every other company that operates in Sweden .

Just because every other company in Sweden accepts extortion as part and parcel of doing business does not make extortion okay.

Re: Swedish court rules against Tesla in dispute with postal service over deliveries

#349
post #344

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tesla has refused to negotiate for over 5 years.

With who though? Not their workers. Can you cite coverage of the "union busting" activities you're talking about?

https://archive.is/gXGSn

Re: Swedish court rules against Tesla in dispute with postal service over deliveries

#350
post #332
post #290

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is pure propaganda and can be ignored outright. IF Metall are driving these negotiations on behalf of their members working at Tesla - had they not shown any interest, IF Metall would not have bothered.

No, it's not. Only 10% of Tesla employees have joined the strike. [0] [0] https://twitter.com/NicklasNilsso14/status/17255571334358634...

Tesla's employees in Sweden are not represented by a single union. Unions are on a -profession basis in Sweden. Only the employees under IF Metall are called out to a strike.

You're literally quoting a letter from Tesla, this has no credibility whatsoever.

Post reply on HN