Earlier quoted context omitted.
Foot races are also solved - these losers should just get a car!
Cars are not allowed in the rules of the game "foot race", therefore your solution is not valid and therefore your argument has no evidence to support your claim.
Parent made an argument by analogy, no evidence needs to enter the picture. At best you can say his analogy is flawed.
It's not even flawed, anyway. If cars not being allowed is supposed to refute the analogy, then an obvious answer would be that Othello playing programs could also banned in Othello competitions (given that the solution can't just be internalized by a human player).