Live data from Hacker News

Dot by New Computer

new.computer

111–120 of 120 posts

Re: Dot by New Computer

#111
Disgusting, naive, and myopic.

Why would I want AI to have such knowledge of my life?

Why aren't people who make these things more socially aware of what people need/want?

I want tech companies to have less knowledge, power, coercion, and control lorded over me. Not more.

Re: Dot by New Computer

#112

Their privacy policy lists OpenAI as one of their partners for data processing, which indicates that this is happening not on your device, and data is also shared with third parties. For me this is the main counterargument against apps like these. I want to feel free to post any information into this without thinking about who may read or use it. Local is the only way to go for software like this in my opinion.

They say in their about page: "We will never monetize your data. We will never monetize your attention. And we believe that the only way we can build towards the future we envision is through the continuous reinforcement of mutual trust and respect. Currently, we leverage best-in-class cloud-hosted models, including ones from OpenAI, Anthropic, and a selection of open-source options. Over time, we plan to reduce exte…

Maybe they won't monetize your data, but I bet whoever acquires the company will.

Re: Dot by New Computer

#113
post #7

“Eventually, Mei decides she’s had enough of Dot interfering in every aspect of her life, uninstalls Dot, and goes about her business as usual, determined to interact with reality in a more wholehearted way.”

See also: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37870437

Re: Dot by New Computer

#114
It's truly stunning to me that in an era where we're all suffering from an epidemic of loneliness, that the smartest among us are just completely obsessed with replacing every last human interaction with a computer. This thing is saying things like, "Your grandma must be a great chef!" and "The Treblemakers are lucky to have you. How about celebrating by bringing some of grandma's scallion flatbread? It'd be a great to share a piece of home with your new community!" The whole thing is a narrative that basically ends with Mei sharing life events w/ Dot for basically no reason other than Dot is her friend. The least realistic thing in the entire demo is when Mei asks Dot to help her find community and Dot suggests people, and not other AI bots.

I'm fine with assistants, but assistants that insinuate their way into your life like a friend or a trusted companion are fuckin weird as hell. There are so many sci-fi movies/series where there's a loner and a pretty advanced AI, and you know how they literally all end? With the loner finding friends! This stuff sucks; it's extremely not rock and roll. This product and others like it are deeply unhealthy and inhuman. Your most intimate relationship shouldn't be with a computer that remembers everything about you and lives to serve you.

Re: Dot by New Computer

#115

Who owns the copyright on mei's grandma's flatbread recipe now?

Recipes cannot be copyrighted.

My point stands. Who owns the copyright for the data entered into this system, who owns the copyright for the 'transformed' version of it?

Re: Dot by New Computer

#116
Putting aside the obvious data sovereignty / privacy problems of such 'lifelogs';

> And when it's time to buy her textbooks, Dot is there to help. "[... Bookends and Beginnings is] a highly rated bookstore that's a 25 minute walk from your current location."

In what future does your AI-powered product exist but there are still dead-tree textbooks!? Even if Z-Library is off the table for "legal reasons", you're talking about a digital Aristotle. Have some vision for heaven's sake.

Re: Dot by New Computer

#117

This is the most likely-to-be-Sherlocked[1] thing I've seen in a while. And when Apple does it, the processing will be done on-device. [1] https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=sherlocked

I remember Sherlock... Looks like Apple already has already been working on it with their Journal App (in Beta now). [0] [0] https://beebom.com/journal-app-iphone/

Fuck.. I kinda have this feature in works for my app.

Re: Dot by New Computer

#118

Their privacy policy lists OpenAI as one of their partners for data processing, which indicates that this is happening not on your device, and data is also shared with third parties. For me this is the main counterargument against apps like these. I want to feel free to post any information into this without thinking about who may read or use it. Local is the only way to go for software like this in my opinion.

They say in their about page: "We will never monetize your data. We will never monetize your attention. And we believe that the only way we can build towards the future we envision is through the continuous reinforcement of mutual trust and respect. Currently, we leverage best-in-class cloud-hosted models, including ones from OpenAI, Anthropic, and a selection of open-source options. Over time, we plan to reduce exte…

'... and by never, we mean until investors get impatient or we are indispensible to you'

Re: Dot by New Computer

#119
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

the problem with voice interfaces is.. How does that work, in public? Late at night when the family is asleep? In noisy environments? During meetings or movies? During conversations with other people? Movies/tv shows voice interfaces work well because the environment and situations where it happens is 100% controlled and driven by plot. The real world is so much messier...

Members of my family speak perfect English, but have an accent. To this day every auto-transcribed voicemail of theirs is just total gibberish.

That too..

Re: Dot by New Computer

#120
post #35
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm guessing it'll hallucinate things about you that it doesn't know. This might be a mixed blessing: it could introduce you to things you weren't aware of, but it could also be annoyingly inaccurate.

well humans also hallucinate or assume things they dont know or on how they remember it so that's alright.

At least everybody knows humans are fallible. We expect computers to be better than that, or at least less fallible. And when they do fail, we expect to be able to determine where and why. That's not often the case with today's AI.
Post reply on HN