Dirupting enemy communications is a pretty standard goal of any army in a war. I'm more surprised it took this long.
When it happened in Iran the US opposed it: https://www.state.gov/joint-statement-on-internet-shutdowns-... Right now you can not call ambulances or firetrucks or anything. Not all 2M Palestinians in Gaza are combatants, but I think that some people consider them to be.
That's not comparable because that is not a military operation and there was no military advantage to the action.
> Right now you can not call ambulances or firetrucks or anything. Not all 2M Palestinians in Gaza are combatants, but I think that some people consider them to be.
I don't know what people think happens in a war, but generally innocents always pay the price. That's true in this conflict and it is true in literally every other conflict that has happened ever.
If only the guilty died in wars, we wouldn't say war is hell.
Generally from an international law perspective, the obligation is to ensure that civilian damage is porportional to military advantage. There is no obligation under the geneva convention to never do anything that could harm civilians, it just has to have enough of a military advantage to justify it (this is a gross over simplification)