Invidious is also a great frontend. From what I can tell, a lot lighter an simpler. From what I can tell, Piped also uses a custom fonts to render controls(?), so it doesn't work well with remote fonts disabled. My go-to instance is: https://yewtu.be/ Occasionally it might be down, but it's easy to find others.
Piped – An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube front end
121–130 of 138 posts
Re: Piped – An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube front end
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
There already is an alternative to youtube. Peertube https://joinpeertube.org/ The problem is most content creators are only publishing on YouTube, so that is where you have to go. If you are a content creator please publish on peertube so we have options. If you know a creator, likewise encourage them to publish there.
Content creators (the ones that we actually hear about and make money off Youtube) are too addicted to the algorithm to even consider dropping Youtube. At most you'll find some of them hedging a bit and joining something like Nebula or Floatplane I believe that we will have to adopt some guerrilla tactics to win this war: we need to make it clear to creators that they won't make any money if they continue using Youtu…
Re: Piped – An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube front end
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
Blocking ads is also a perfect example of a Kantian non-universalizable maxim.
I often consider Kant's first formulation of the Categorical Imperative as a moral guide. Internally I paraphrase it as: if everyone does this [action that I intend to do] will it be a good thing. I notionally insert "[everyone] who would wish to". This situation is like the 'desire path' situation where an authority has imposed a pathway, but many pedestrians choose a different path because that is more useful. Ulti…
I'm entirely unconvinced that even this is true. Today's platforms and software are built around control and centralization, which is indeed expensive. But there's an obvious alternate path. Instead of preventing users from downloading media, embrace it. Build ipfs into browsers. Link to videos on ipfs. Add a "pin" menu item right on the browser UI for videos/images so that users can easily save copies of what they like and help serve it. Make it so you can subscribe to a channel by pinning an ipns name so you automatically download and seed new videos you're interested in. Let people pin to their (paid) cloud storage too.
There's a huge design space here. Expensive centralization is a tiny fraction of what's possible.
Re: Piped – An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube front end
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
Content creators (the ones that we actually hear about and make money off Youtube) are too addicted to the algorithm to even consider dropping Youtube. At most you'll find some of them hedging a bit and joining something like Nebula or Floatplane I believe that we will have to adopt some guerrilla tactics to win this war: we need to make it clear to creators that they won't make any money if they continue using Youtu…
Many of the good ones don't have much audience
Re: Piped – An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube front end
#125Re: Piped – An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube front end
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
Many of the good ones don't have much audience
And if they are really good and expect to grow, they will stick to youtube because that's where their potential audience is. :(
Re: Piped – An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube front end
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
You'd be surprised, I had some old Symbian phone with some really ancient Youtube app and it still was working couple years ago. The phone's screen eventually died, so I can't check now
Wasn’t the Wii’s YT client infamously long lived?
Re: Piped – An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube front end
#128Earlier quoted context omitted.
Google can block you at any time for any reason. Terms of Service are never relevant. If you're doing something many other people do, you're okay. Besides, suppose they do block you. What's the worst that going to happen? If you can think of something really bad (e.g. I'm going to lose all my photos) then you should do something to address that. Regardless.
Photos would be a one evening worth trivial task to back up to another system . Switching your phone from android or changing an email address with hundreds of contacts over many years is far more difficult and expensive. Google or Apple for that matter can make life difficult for a single person by banding their account , there is not a whole lot an average person can do to mitigate that risk.
Re: Piped – An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube front end
#129Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can't speak for piped, but I use a self-hosted Invidious instance to watch Youtube. You don't log into it with your Google account, it has its own authentication so that it can save your (distinct) subscriptions. Even if Google decided to crack down on alternate front-end usage, they can't correlate it back to your actual account.
> they can't correlate it back to your actual account. Can't is a strong word. They might not bother, but if you're logged in to your Google account on other services from the same IP they might tie those together. Wouldn't be 100% accurate but if they decided to go nuclear ¯\_(ツ)_/¯