I have to say that the crypto space is doomed and nobody cares about decentralization, but the technology behind it enables doing exactly this: 1 backend and many different clients. IMO this is the future - breaking monopolies with separation of powers a la John Locke
Piped – An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube front end
31–40 of 138 posts
Re: Piped – An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube front end
#32I feel like a better answer would be alternative platforms.
Re: Piped – An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube front end
#33The privacy argument is extremely important, also in regards to avoiding tracking via ads, but I do not think bypassing or blocking ads is the way forward. In the free democratic world, we really should aim to do better than this, and instead try to actually develop privacy respecting alternatives that is not going to undermine the internet, further empower the big players, or hurt website owners unnecessarily – incl…
Blocking ads is also a perfect example of a Kantian non-universalizable maxim.
Re: Piped – An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube front end
#34I have to say that the crypto space is doomed and nobody cares about decentralization, but the technology behind it enables doing exactly this: 1 backend and many different clients. IMO this is the future - breaking monopolies with separation of powers a la John Locke
Re: Piped – An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube front end
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
These won't be supported forever
You'd be surprised, I had some old Symbian phone with some really ancient Youtube app and it still was working couple years ago. The phone's screen eventually died, so I can't check now
Re: Piped – An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube front end
#36How long until YouTube figures out how to block all of this stuff like Piped and Invidious etc.? I feel like a better answer would be alternative platforms.
They have been working towards requiring chrome, but that won’t work unless they close source it and lock down developer tools and apis, which would be a death sentence for chrome.
Re: Piped – An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube front end
#37The privacy argument is extremely important, also in regards to avoiding tracking via ads, but I do not think bypassing or blocking ads is the way forward. In the free democratic world, we really should aim to do better than this, and instead try to actually develop privacy respecting alternatives that is not going to undermine the internet, further empower the big players, or hurt website owners unnecessarily – incl…
You may make the argument that YouTube includes music, but the quality and capabilities of the platform are very poor compared to competitors.
$5/mo is about the most I would ever pay.
Re: Piped – An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube front end
#38With a name like "Piped" I wonder if it's related to the NewPipe app, one of my favorite apps on Graphene OS and something that I really wish existed on iOS.
I believe the main difference is that NewPipe is an Android App frontend and Piped is a web frontend with the Extractor library as a core dependency.
Which makes the NewPipe Extractor library a great starting point for building more, different frontend applications.
Disclaimer: I'm no expert and this is an oversimplified explanation.
Re: Piped – An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube front end
#39Re: Piped – An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube front end
#40If this is too off-topic please just ignore it (and don't DV). I want to embed YT videos on a website, but we would like them to be as private as possible. For example, DDG has a player which shields the watcher from YT's data hoovering. Any suggestions? Perhaps the search terms I'm using are wrong?
[1]: https://yewtu.be/watch?v=xzTH_ZqaFKI