Live data from Hacker News

Subsidies Awarded to Tesla Inc: at least $2,829,855,494 and Counting

subsidytracker.goodjobsfirst.org

71–80 of 82 posts

Re: Subsidies Awarded to Tesla Inc: at least $2,829,855,494 and Counting

#71

Also: Boeing 15 billion dollars, amazon 11b, intel 8b, ford 7.7b, foxconn 4.8b, etc. This organised propaganda against Tesla needs to stop, sure Musk is an a*hole, is he an evil a*hole like some othe CEOs? I don't know... Electric cars are still something beneficial to the sustainability of the car industry and the environment. And Ford still got more money... Foxconn uses slaves to make a luxury device that's market…

who would've thought a simple fact about tesla would be so triggering. IMO the post was quite neutral so hold off on your bias.

It's not triggering, I visit HN everyday and I never see similar posts about Foxconn, Amazon or Boeing. I see them all the time for Tesla.

Re: Subsidies Awarded to Tesla Inc: at least $2,829,855,494 and Counting

#72
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Electric cars are still something beneficial to the sustainability of the car industry and the environment. Hard disagree, they're a sidestep at best (batteries aren't made of magic green recycled pixie dust, the electricity to charge them doesn't come of 100% renewables, usually, tire dust still contributes massively to plastic pollution), detrimental at worst, especially when sold as an extremely shitty and ineff…

>I mean, have you heard Bezos or anyone of his ilk actively sabotage a defensive military campaign thus enabling the continuation of genocide As usual, a lie travels halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes. https://www.engadget.com/ukrainian-official-claims-elon-musk...

https://www.theverge.com/2023/10/1/23895069/walter-isaacson-...

Re: Subsidies Awarded to Tesla Inc: at least $2,829,855,494 and Counting

#73
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Giving a handout is not the same thing as taking one, so it's really not hypocritical to take a handout while believing the handout should not exist. For example, someone could be opposed to student loan debt forgiveness in principle, but that same person would probably not rip up their check.

In both cases it depends on how the belief is formed and expressed. To build upon your examples: Case 1 Belief: "I don't believe student loan debts should be forgiven." Action: Accepts student loan forgiveness. Outcome: Hypocritical. Action directly conflicts with the belief, ergo the belief is not truly held. Case 2 Belief 1: "I don't believe student loan debts should be forgiven for everyone." Belief 2: "I believe…

I don't think that case 1 is hypocritical, because forgiving and being forgiven are two different things/beliefs/actions. Therefore, no conflict.

Re: Subsidies Awarded to Tesla Inc: at least $2,829,855,494 and Counting

#74
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not hypocrisy to believe no one should have subsidies including oneself. It just means you want a level playing field, not a distorted one. And taking a subsidy when you don't believe in them, is reasonable too, because you don't really have other options.

It's not hypocritical to believe something, but it is hypocritical to act in a way contrary to the belief you are espousing. A usable definition of hypocrisy is "the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform". In this case, a belief that car companies should not be subsidized by government while simultaneously accepting subsidies from government. The act (acc…

> It's not hypocritical to believe something, but it is hypocritical to act in a way contrary to the belief you are espousing

That's not what's happening.

Tesla is taking subsidies because they are available, it would be a poor decision not to. Tesla could take a stand and not accept subsidies but then those subsidies will fall to their competitors and they will lose.

It's like believing the presidency should be decided by the popular vote but not campaigning in California or thinking healthcare should be free but paying for insurance.

One is a belief about how things should be and the other is a reaction to how things are.

Re: Subsidies Awarded to Tesla Inc: at least $2,829,855,494 and Counting

#75
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In both cases it depends on how the belief is formed and expressed. To build upon your examples: Case 1 Belief: "I don't believe student loan debts should be forgiven." Action: Accepts student loan forgiveness. Outcome: Hypocritical. Action directly conflicts with the belief, ergo the belief is not truly held. Case 2 Belief 1: "I don't believe student loan debts should be forgiven for everyone." Belief 2: "I believe…

I don't think that case 1 is hypocritical, because forgiving and being forgiven are two different things/beliefs/actions. Therefore, no conflict.

Agreed. Case 1 is not hypocritical. Hypocritical would be forgiving loans while believe they should not be forgiven.

Accepting a forgiven loan is a different action - you don't believe the other person should have done it, but they did, your acceptance of that is a different matter.

Try rephrasing it into the negative: I don't believe anyone should pay sales tax. Is it hypocritical to pay sales tax when you buy something? No, it's not.

Re: Subsidies Awarded to Tesla Inc: at least $2,829,855,494 and Counting

#76
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not hypocrisy to believe no one should have subsidies including oneself. It just means you want a level playing field, not a distorted one. And taking a subsidy when you don't believe in them, is reasonable too, because you don't really have other options.

It's not hypocritical to believe something, but it is hypocritical to act in a way contrary to the belief you are espousing. A usable definition of hypocrisy is "the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform". In this case, a belief that car companies should not be subsidized by government while simultaneously accepting subsidies from government. The act (acc…

Publicly owned companies have a fiduciary duties to their shareholders to pursue all government programs for which they are eligible.

The company, its officers and directors could all be sued by shareholders in a massive class action lawsuit if they did not abide by their legal responsibilities based on personal beliefs.

Re: Subsidies Awarded to Tesla Inc: at least $2,829,855,494 and Counting

#77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not hypocritical to believe something, but it is hypocritical to act in a way contrary to the belief you are espousing. A usable definition of hypocrisy is "the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform". In this case, a belief that car companies should not be subsidized by government while simultaneously accepting subsidies from government. The act (acc…

Publicly owned companies have a fiduciary duties to their shareholders to pursue all government programs for which they are eligible. The company, its officers and directors could all be sued by shareholders in a massive class action lawsuit if they did not abide by their legal responsibilities based on personal beliefs.

This is just an urban legend.

Also, Elon Musk acquired solar city and then gutted it. Essentially wasting billions of Tesla shareholder dollars and he basically shrugged it off. What he did with solar city is very obviously illegal, yet the consequences have been quite insignificant. If you don't know what he did: he acquired solar city for 2.6 billion dollars to bail out his brother Kimbal Musk at the expense of public Tesla shareholders. That money literally went up in flames for nepotism. You could say that this subsidy money he took for Tesla has all gone into the solar city bailout.

Re: Subsidies Awarded to Tesla Inc: at least $2,829,855,494 and Counting

#78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Publicly owned companies have a fiduciary duties to their shareholders to pursue all government programs for which they are eligible. The company, its officers and directors could all be sued by shareholders in a massive class action lawsuit if they did not abide by their legal responsibilities based on personal beliefs.

This is just an urban legend. Also, Elon Musk acquired solar city and then gutted it. Essentially wasting billions of Tesla shareholder dollars and he basically shrugged it off. What he did with solar city is very obviously illegal, yet the consequences have been quite insignificant. If you don't know what he did: he acquired solar city for 2.6 billion dollars to bail out his brother Kimbal Musk at the expense of pub…

The problem Tesla board and shareholders have with holding Elon accountable is the value of their shares is completely dependent on the belief that Elon the super genius will lead them to new products. Without Elon it's just just another car company and worth a fraction of what it is now.

Re: Subsidies Awarded to Tesla Inc: at least $2,829,855,494 and Counting

#79
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Walter Issacson (the author who originally broke the news on this story) later clarified that he was mistaken on the timeline. Calling someone a fascist is a pretty wild accusation, especially when it seems it was motivated by a misunderstanding. "Hi, Tim. Based on my conversations with Musk, I mistakenly thought the policy to not allow Starlink to be used for an attack on Crimea had been first decided on the night o…

So he actively sabotaged an Ukrainian attack against the Russian navy, just as I initially stated? His excuse is bullshit too > If I had agreed to their request, then SpaceX would be explicitly complicit in a major act of war and conflict escalation Refusing to help the defender is siding with the offender by allowing them to continue their senseless war of agression and genocide. > Calling someone a fascist is a pre…

>Invasion of Iraq despite them having nothing to do with 911

Just distributing freedom to the world

>Not let people use your product to kill other people

Facism

>Refusing to help the defender is siding with the offender by allowing them to continue their senseless war of agression and genocide

So by this logic anyone who helped Iraqis kill American soldiers is a good guy and anyone who refused to help the Iraqis by default sided with the US in their senseless war of agression and genocide

I honestly wasn't going to reply because we all know how hard these narratives are pushed by real and less real people, but this feels like arguing with a jew, christian or muslim, there is no way you can convince them moises didn't split the sea / jesus didn't walk on water / muhamad didn't fly on a winged horse, despite how illogical or contradictory the stories are... So yeah go at it, history does repeat itself and there will always reality bending people who push false narratives and out of context words to commit more violence.

But honestly wtf is wrong with you? Just turn off the computer and sit down and think of what you just said, Russia's invasion is an invasion and I am a pacifist so all invasions and wars are evil in the way I see it, but was it unprovoqued? hell no... you can't just interfere with Canadian elections and put a Russian puppet there who'll eventually apply to join anti-NATO and put nukes at your borders and not expect something in return... But whatever I still see war as the epitome of evil so Putin is evil for starting that war, it's not genocidal (you can't just lie) because they're racially the same people, hell I was alive when the USSR existed and Ukraine and Russia was the same country... But me seeing war as evil implies death as evil, so had Zelensky negociated with Putin and accepted to resign or whatever just so his people didn't die I'd have admired him, but the way he went at it makes me view him as more evil than even Putin... it's like me a father, having home invaders with guns invading my house (and we only have knives) and instead of giving up and negociating whatever solution to save the lives of my children and wife, I instead arm them with knives and send them to die...

And the US in all of this? Well the US is going to do what the US always did, violence and death and war, remember in 2003 when you made fun of us (France) for not helping you with Iraq? I won't criticize your country that much since most people here are from the US and I don't want to offend everyone.

And Elon in all of this? The guy is a human he's neither Ghandi or Hitler, that splitting (black and white thinking) is the most important trait in diagnosing clusted B disorders (npd, bpd, asd and hpd) so be careful with that.

I'm a decent guy yet if I sold my shares in Paypal for 170 million $ I'd stop working and go chill in some island, let alone invest/start Tesla/SpaceX etc. he could've started a finance company or whatever if his only goal was going for a monetary high score, and he could've retired at 100 or 200 billion $. Sure electric cars aren't as environmentally friendly as previously thought today but eventually we can expect more sustainable energy production or whatever, and how the fck is SpaceX not beneficial to mankind, well it's risky because we'll eventually have lots of debris out there but let's be honest and say it would've been a hell of a lot easier to make more money in finance or some other domain, the guy at least had good intentions, and if you call him facist you're calling all of us facists as I already explained (I'm decent but still worse than him and given his money I'd be a lot worse). And don't even get me started on Twitter, the guy took a mainstream social media platform and lowered censorship on it, how the fck is this evil? What now all of a sudden censorship is good and free speech is bad? You can't have it both ways after fucking up Iraq to dust and selling it as freedom then now all of a sudden freedom is bad. If the site is full of right wing bigots it's a direct reaction to the left wing authoritarianism that's been going around lately, you can't just argue for censorship and firing people from their jobs for saying X and Y then expect the reaction to be a polite discussion over the philosophical merits of free speech, you are of course going to get the opposite of that.

And also you can't just worship the guy in 2017 then in 2018 call him Facist this isn't a healthy outlook on things. You're showing that you have no idea what true facism is, and that's where the problem is, you become a facist yourself by demonizing others over trivial things while calling them the facists. And it has always happened so you have to be careful of that it's a normal tragic human things we do and have done in all societies. The christians prosecuted the jews because they were heathens and in doing so commited true heathen crimes, the muslims prosecuted the christians because they were heathens and in doing so commited true heathen crimes, etc.

>Wikipedia: Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.

So Elon isn't far-right (isn't married, doesn't criticize drugs, dresses in an edgy way, etc.), he isn't that much of an authoritarian either (hard to prove at his level because he has money so if he fires someone over something you'll twist it to argue your point, but then we're all authoritarians when it comes to us, but afaik he doesn't support any single political authoritarian regime or wishes for it to force its beliefs on people), ultranationalist (he's south african who immigrated to Canada then the US), he's not for the subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation (he was anti covid lockdowns, he's against censorship, etc.) and he's not for regimentation of society and the economy being a capitalist who never judged anyone for any habit or anything, even the women he dated were from different ideologies and had different styles.

And I didn't have to go deep to prove you wrong, I'm just an average guy, so while your discourse can fly on reddit, here everyone has access to the kind of logic I used, so why bother lying on a forum like HN if you know people will just read your comment and think "this is propaganda" and move on?

Re: Subsidies Awarded to Tesla Inc: at least $2,829,855,494 and Counting

#80
post #75
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think that case 1 is hypocritical, because forgiving and being forgiven are two different things/beliefs/actions. Therefore, no conflict.

Agreed. Case 1 is not hypocritical. Hypocritical would be forgiving loans while believe they should not be forgiven. Accepting a forgiven loan is a different action - you don't believe the other person should have done it, but they did, your acceptance of that is a different matter. Try rephrasing it into the negative: I don't believe anyone should pay sales tax. Is it hypocritical to pay sales tax when you buy somet…

At some point this is banging-head-against-wall grade stuff, so I'll probably stop here. You're in the right area on the sales tax example, but it suffers from the same belief construction and expression issues.

Let's play your example out in a conversation:

1: "I don't believe anyone should pay sales tax!"

2: "But you (someone who is anyone) do pay sales tax, are you a hypocrite?"

1: "Of course not. I have to, it's the law."

2: "So you believe nobody should have to pay sales tax, but they must when legally required?"

1: "Yes."

2: "Oh good, that seems reasonable. I also hate taxes."

Post reply on HN