Live data from Hacker News

Nick Cave on ChatGPT and the creative process

theredhandfiles.com

31–40 of 113 posts

Re: Nick Cave on ChatGPT and the creative process

#31
If AI generated art, stablediffustion, midjourney, et. al., isn't copyrightable[0] then wouldn't anything generated by ChatGPT not be copyrightable?

Would that not mean that record label can ignore him when asking to be paid for songwriting royalties? Seems like a recipe to make yourself penniless.

[0] https://builtin.com/artificial-intelligence/ai-copyright

Re: Nick Cave on ChatGPT and the creative process

#32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you saying people who make "true art" should not be doing it for reward, or should not be as interested in money as non-artists? This is enormously reductive and is quite a modern idea. Most artists in history have made art for gain. It is a bold strategy to suggest that Nick Cave is confused by ideas of income and art. I don't care who you are: on this topic, Cave is almost 100% certainly better informed than yo…

Maybe Nick Cave should stop using computers too since they simplify the "true creation process". Or just disregard tools altogether and return to his destiny as denoted by nominative determinism.

The difference is huge. ChatGPT is not a tool. It is a creation designed to replace usage of tools to build products, with already finished products.

Re: Nick Cave on ChatGPT and the creative process

#33

From the article: > ChatGPT is fast-tracking the commodification of the human spirit by mechanising the imagination. It renders our participation in the act of creation as valueless and unnecessary. That ‘songwriter ‘you were talking to, Leon, who is using ChatGPT to write ‘his’ lyrics because it is ‘faster and easier ,’is participating in this erosion of the world’s soul and the spirit of humanity itself and, to put…

As a premise I agree with this argument, however, in my own practical use of Chat GPT, I find that it often inspires — not replaces - my own creativity.

It can give a good skeleton for how an idea can end up looking - which is often exactly what I need to implement the vision I have.

Perhaps this is still skipping a vital part of the ideation process, but it doesn’t seem to me like it’s completely devoid of creative struggle.

Re: Nick Cave on ChatGPT and the creative process

#34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not an artist, but many people refer to the creative part of making software as an “art”, so here’s a take. ChatGPT allows for rapid iteration of ideas. I have an idea, I get ChatGPT to flesh it out, I iterate. The value ChatGPT is providing is not to be the source of creativity, it’s in speeding up the process from idea to concrete implementation. It’s a tool. In software development and engineering more generally,…

Coding is not art, it is a learned and trained skill. Even though, I believe that the use of ChatGPT or any other AI assistant will eventually lead to the creation of inexperienced and unskilled generations of developers. Using AI to generate "art" will just kill human creativity. Not only will it do that, it will create a new normal, where this AI art will be viewed as standard. Just as we currently have an over-mon…

Coding is technique, just like writing prose or laying down brush strokes on canvas or whatever else. All are learned skills, all can be used in the process of artistic creation.

Re: Nick Cave on ChatGPT and the creative process

#35

From the article: > ChatGPT is fast-tracking the commodification of the human spirit by mechanising the imagination. It renders our participation in the act of creation as valueless and unnecessary. That ‘songwriter ‘you were talking to, Leon, who is using ChatGPT to write ‘his’ lyrics because it is ‘faster and easier ,’is participating in this erosion of the world’s soul and the spirit of humanity itself and, to put…

I strongly disagree. Even as imperfect as the current crop of LLMs are, I'm doing things today that year-ago-me would have considered firmly in the realm of science fiction. It's reinvigorating my creative drive across the board, and I love it. I'm getting to make the Interesting Choices that lead to Art faster and more freely than ever.

Others will feel differently, and that's ok. I find myself not even mad at such florid proclamations as to the death of the human spirit. Such sanctimonious proclamations were made by portrait artists at the advent of photography as well, and yet here we are, Art intact, all these decades later.

Re: Nick Cave on ChatGPT and the creative process

#36
Sorry, the business side of art has already done this to artists.

I recall a famous songwriter, unfortunately I cannot remember their name to prove this, who used free association word games to write songs. Because nonsense lyrics have helped propel otherwise mediocre songs to commercial success.

He would write songs just by putting down words, free associating those words, until he had something that sounded interesting or cool. That is not how writing has worked, historically. It's pure nonsense.

Then to go further all of the groups of songwriters who write silly pop tunes and lyrics by using mathematical systems and trying to ride vibes and trends they see others doing.

This idea of AI somehow destroying the purity of art would have made sense maybe in the 1950s, but not today. This guy is playing some kind of game because he does not like AI, it's as simple as that.

Re: Nick Cave on ChatGPT and the creative process

#37
post #2

But don't claim the lyrics as yours.

Yeah. One possibility is that some AI's will be considered as individuals. With all regards that come with that.

Perhaps even legal rights (owning things for themselves, starting a business, voting rights?).

So? A new 'person' was created. Happens all the time.

Re: Nick Cave on ChatGPT and the creative process

#38
Chat gpt and God? )) I understand that each person have soul in which I truly believe, when you want something and you do, that is your soul want it, and your soul and space only exist in this world. I am gonna do it , that we saying when we alone and feel that we need some support.

Re: Nick Cave on ChatGPT and the creative process

#40
post #18

From the article: > ChatGPT is fast-tracking the commodification of the human spirit by mechanising the imagination. It renders our participation in the act of creation as valueless and unnecessary. That ‘songwriter ‘you were talking to, Leon, who is using ChatGPT to write ‘his’ lyrics because it is ‘faster and easier ,’is participating in this erosion of the world’s soul and the spirit of humanity itself and, to put…

In my head, I keep making this comparison to photography. I like to take pictures. Usually, I take many, many -- hundreds -- of pictures for a project and I'll find one or two that I like most in that bunch. I think this is a pretty common practice in photography, euphemistically referred to as portfolio editing. I see a strong analogy between portfolio editing and operation of AI like ChatGPT. The camera and the AI…

I think it's fair to say that conceiving of a prompt and iterating it toward a desirable output can be artistically expressive. Where the comparison with cameras falls down for me is a) at least to date, writing prompts feels a lot less intentional and a lot more random (AI people themselves make heavy use of the term "cargo culting") than [arranging and] composing a photograph, and b) your camera can function from first principles without requiring the work of other photographers to be blended into an information slurry and loaded into its memory.
Post reply on HN