Former intel officer says 'non-human biologics’ found at alleged UFO crash sites

Post by DropInIn » Thu, Jul 27, 2023, 7:36 AM UTC

kromem wrote: post #430

wildermuthn wrote: post #377

I’m a huge skeptic, but I’ve been following this very closely over the past few months. Fermi’s paradox has two good answers — we don’t see aliens because they don’t exist, or we don’t see them because they are here already. They should be here already. The paradox is about why we don’t see them. Being skeptical is different than doubt-by-default. A skeptic is curious and slow to judge. So with great curiosity, I’ve…

I don't get why no one ever throws out time travel as an explanation over extraterrestrial. Given the limit of the speed of information and the expansion of the universe, there's a VERY small area that would even be aware of the signals we've started sending out over the past century to come looking. But Earth would be an extremely interesting destination....for future Earth. Though personally the most likely answer…

Post by jiggawatts » Thu, Jul 27, 2023, 7:38 AM UTC

neom wrote: post #327

Full hearing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EL_HYG3uXQg I watched it, pretty weird. Particularly interesting: 1:45:00 through 2:00:00

Post by DropInIn » Thu, Jul 27, 2023, 7:40 AM UTC

likeabbas wrote: post #252

AndrewKemendo wrote: post #246

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Grusch was a GS15 NGA officer that was read into over 2000 special access programs and prepared/delivered the presidential daily briefing in 2021. He’s quite literally one of the most credentialed intelligence officers in the US. This is way more common than you think it is and again, not special. I prepped multiple PDBs from 2012-2015 while at DIA and then again while on the JS/J2 staff. Delivering a segment of the…

What was your rank? How many SAPs were you read into? Having Top Secret SCI clearance does not give you immediate access to every SAP you request to be read into. Most people are not read into more that a dozen SAPs. I’ll also point out that if Grusch was an unexceptional IC officer, the pentagon would easily be able to discredit him as such. To date, the pentagon has not attempted to say anything about Grusch’s cred…

Post by ilaksh » Thu, Jul 27, 2023, 7:44 AM UTC

DoreenMichele wrote: post #42

The whistleblower former intelligence official David Grusch says he faced “very brutal and very unfortunate” retaliation after he went public with his allegations. Intelligence personnel swear to keep their mouths shut. He has no real evidence and no real compelling reason that I'm seeing for coming forward. What did he expect?

Post by ilaksh » Thu, Jul 27, 2023, 7:50 AM UTC

thegrim22 wrote: post #371

If, as alleged, the government has been running a many decade disinformation campaign on the UAP issue, what are the odds that everyone in this thread is a legitimate commenter? To what level would comment threads such as this be manipulated in different ways in order to maintain/push the narrative the government wants? How do you even attempt to have conversations about something like this when such a powerful adver…