> Simply saying "you're wrong" is not an argument.
Right, which is why I followed up with a categorical and complete description of the problems with your nonsensical word salad.
>> Please look up what habeas corpus means.
> You cannot detain people without charges or probable cause.
No, you're thinking of the Fourth Amendment. Habeas corpus is the mechanism by which a person can report a suspected unlawful detention or imprisonment to a court, which can then order that the person be brought forward in person, in order to ascertain whether or not the particular imprisoning entity has the authority to do so. Obviously this has nothing at all to do with vaccines except in the fever swamps.
>> Informed consent is not a right. Those are enumerated also in reference works.
> Okay then, here's a reference work:
> "Informed consent is both an ethical and legal obligation of medical practitioners in the US" according to the NIH: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430827/
Not therefore a right, got it.
> > Medicine in the united states is essentially the opposite of socialized.
> And yet it was public health officials who imposed lock-downs. There is clearly socialized medicine in the US.
What you're referring to as 'socialized' here is the government, which we as citizens and resident aliens agree to recognize in order to increase and defend the common good. For example, we agree to being policed, we agree to being taxed, we agree to being bound by laws, and we agree in particular in this case to working together to try to stop the collapse of healthcare systems, even if that is inimical to the political chances of the president at the time.