[This PDF]( http://media.wix.com/ugd/bbfb8a_2ea66bffc09b40d099237bb83813... ) appears to provide information about their methodology -- noting it was linked from [this article]( https://www.macrumors.com/2015/07/20/apple-watch-tops-iphone... ). In short, it looks like potential-respondents first had to apply (e.g., in response to [this Facebook post]( https://www.facebook.com/Wristly.co/posts/apple-watch-owner-... ))…
Apple is NPD manifested as a corporation. Everything they do is self-gratifying, so of course also this. "All-new"... Pffft.
Is Apple making implausible iPhone satisfaction claims?
61–70 of 108 posts
Re: Is Apple making implausible iPhone satisfaction claims?
#62They are using Google reviews as proxy for customer satisfaction. I really can't take rest of the article seriously after that, knowing anyone can leave a review at Google and there's no guarantee they own the phone. Sure, 99% satisfaction rate is pretty much impossible, but if all Apple asked was "are you satisfied with iPhone 14" with "yes" & "not at all" options and only surveyed iPhone 14 owners, I can easily see…
If you want to go really deep on online review manipulation, I'm co-author of this research paper on ratings inflation in online marketplaces: https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mksc.2022.135.... If you get in touch, I can send you more papers on fake reviews that I like.
Re: Is Apple making implausible iPhone satisfaction claims?
#63[This PDF]( http://media.wix.com/ugd/bbfb8a_2ea66bffc09b40d099237bb83813... ) appears to provide information about their methodology -- noting it was linked from [this article]( https://www.macrumors.com/2015/07/20/apple-watch-tops-iphone... ). In short, it looks like potential-respondents first had to apply (e.g., in response to [this Facebook post]( https://www.facebook.com/Wristly.co/posts/apple-watch-owner-... ))…
Re: Is Apple making implausible iPhone satisfaction claims?
#64Re: Is Apple making implausible iPhone satisfaction claims?
#65Re: Is Apple making implausible iPhone satisfaction claims?
#66[This PDF]( http://media.wix.com/ugd/bbfb8a_2ea66bffc09b40d099237bb83813... ) appears to provide information about their methodology -- noting it was linked from [this article]( https://www.macrumors.com/2015/07/20/apple-watch-tops-iphone... ). In short, it looks like potential-respondents first had to apply (e.g., in response to [this Facebook post]( https://www.facebook.com/Wristly.co/posts/apple-watch-owner-... ))…
Hey - I'm the post author. Thank you sharing these details on the Watch survey.
Isn't that something you should've researched before writing the post? Methodology seems like an important factor here.
Re: Is Apple making implausible iPhone satisfaction claims?
#67They are using Google reviews as proxy for customer satisfaction. I really can't take rest of the article seriously after that, knowing anyone can leave a review at Google and there's no guarantee they own the phone. Sure, 99% satisfaction rate is pretty much impossible, but if all Apple asked was "are you satisfied with iPhone 14" with "yes" & "not at all" options and only surveyed iPhone 14 owners, I can easily see…
Re: Is Apple making implausible iPhone satisfaction claims?
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
Later on they said they use Mailtrack [0]. I looked at their FAQ and they just use a tracking pixel. I don't really think that mail clients in a coorporate environment (i.e. Apple) download external images automatically. Mailtrack seems to be confident, that only 5-10% of recipients aren't "trackable" [1], but I haven't seen a mail client that by default downloads external media in a while. [0] https://mailtrack.io […
See my peer comment: Apple Mail really does download external images automatically, on a server to hide your IP address. It then rewrites those emails to reference the cached images from the server. Every tracker pixel sent to a mail account with this feature will be counted as read, whether or not the user opens it.
Here, I found a corroborating link from 2013: https://www.litmus.com/blog/gmail-adds-image-caching-what-yo...
Re: Is Apple making implausible iPhone satisfaction claims?
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am totally out of the loop when it comes to these things. My client always opens in plain text or html render with JS and external content disabled. I believe this is true for most clients. On the other hand security scanners, browsers engines and other Middleware stuff can trigger such a counter without any user interaction if I am not mistaken.
The pixel is just an image, so unless you disable email images loading by default, the server will still count you. Pre-caching will sometimes mess with the counters though, making the counts lower than the actual.
Re: Is Apple making implausible iPhone satisfaction claims?
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hey - I'm the post author. Thank you sharing these details on the Watch survey.
> Hey - I'm the post author. Thank you sharing these details on the Watch survey. I wonder if 451 Research is doing something similar with their iPhone survey. Isn't that something you should've researched before writing the post? Methodology seems like an important factor here.