GPT-4 API General Availability

Post by fatherzine » Fri, Jul 07, 2023, 4:26 AM UTC

xtracto wrote: post #349

flangola7 wrote: post #347

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is the bottleneck. EUV Photolithography is one of the hardest engineering challenges ever faced, it's like trying to drop a feather from space and guaranteeing it lands on a specific blade of grass. Manufacturing these GPUs at all requires us to stretch the limit of what is physically possible in multiple domains, much less producing them at scale.

Thanks for this explanation! :) (as someone without knowledge of the hardware process I appreciated it). It is SO amazing that we have such a driving force (LLMs/consumer-AI) for this (instead of stupid cryptocurrencies mining or high-performance gaming). This should drive innovation pretty strongly and I am sure the next "leap" in this regard (processing hardware) will put technology in a completely different level.

Post by trolan » Fri, Jul 07, 2023, 4:40 AM UTC

ShadowBanThis01 wrote: post #375

npew wrote: post #287

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(I work at OpenAI) We're planning to cover the cost for fine-tuning replacement models. We're still working through the exact mechanics that will work best for customers, and will be reaching out to customers to get feedback on different approaches in the next few weeks.

Why does OpenAI demand your phone number, and a particular KIND of phone number at that? For example they won't accept VOIP numbers. I'm not about to give them my real phone number. It's a deal-breaker for many.

Post by kordlessagain » Fri, Jul 07, 2023, 4:44 AM UTC

PostOnce wrote: post #253

tensor wrote: post #233

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A reminder that llama isn't legal for the vast majority of use cases. Unless you signed their contract and then you can use it only for research purposes.

OpenLLaMA is though. https://github.com/openlm-research/open_llama All of these are surmountable problems. We can beat OpenAI. We can drain their moat.

Post by rileymat2 » Fri, Jul 07, 2023, 4:49 AM UTC

Art9681 wrote: post #370

twbarr wrote: post #278

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, but what is it? Not your lawyer, not legal advice, but it's not a trade secret, they've given it to researchers. It's not a trademark because it's not an origin identifier. The structure might be patentable, but the weights won't be. It's certainly not a mask work. It might have been a contract violation for the guy who redistributed it, but I'm not a party to that contract.

I'm going to play devil's advocate and state that a lot of what you mentioned will be relevant to a tiny part of the world that has the means to enforce this. The law will be forced to change as a response to AI. Many debates will be had. Many crap laws will be made by people grasping at straws but it's too late. Putting red tape around this technology puts that nation at a technological disadvantage. I would go as f…

Post by marinhero » Fri, Jul 07, 2023, 5:09 AM UTC

PostOnce wrote: post #197

Promote and proliferate local LLMs. If you use GPT, you're giving OpenAI money to lobby the government so they'll have no competitors, ultimately screwing yourself, your wallet, and the rest of us too. OpenAI has no moat, unless you give them money to write legislation. I can currently run some scary smart and fast LLMs on a 5 year old laptop with no GPU. The future is, at least, interesting.