Earlier quoted context omitted.
Greeks and Romans had almost bo qualms about infanticide though. It was no less acceptable than abortion is nowadays. They only had issues with ritualizing the process or killing older children..
Is there an objective reason to find infanticide worse than abortion, besides cultural mores? It's worse for the performer, certainly, because you have to look at it before you kill it, but a newborn doesn't have any more personality than a fetus.
Ancient Carthaginians did sacrifice their children (2014)
191–200 of 255 posts
Re: Ancient Carthaginians did sacrifice their children (2014)
#192[flagged]
Violence and the Sacred is a book that tries to answer, among some other things, why ritual sacrifices used to happen. I haven’t finished it yet, René Girard could perhaps be a bit meandering, but it’s an insightful read so far (and impossible to do justice in a summary). He observes that in older human societies a transgression could easily lead to an infinite loop of vendetta-like bloodshed. He also observes that s…
Re: Ancient Carthaginians did sacrifice their children (2014)
#193Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm drawing a blank here, but what do you mean "state-sanctioned castration"? Do you have examples? The only thing I can think of is the chemical castration that is done to sex offenders or to treat cancer, but for the most part, this is done to adults, and not children. Or are you referring to something else that would affect children of both sexes?
As the other poster mentioned they're referencing treatment of trans children. They are also factually incorrect as surgical intervention is not and has never been part of the recommended treatment for children. As such their intentions are either misinformed or malicious.
You are wrong. Surgical interventions are performed for children by reputable hospitals and surgeons.
Re: Ancient Carthaginians did sacrifice their children (2014)
#194Child sacrifice hooks into some very deep and dark aspects of human psychology that we have yet to unpack. There is a reason that this practice crops up in various civilizations seemingly independently, and it is not a pretty one - at least not by contemporary moral sensibilities. It is impossible to understand the biblical narrative of the binding of Isaac, for example, without addressing the context in which such a…
`Ibn Arabi has a splendid take on the entire affair. I read it in Toshihiko Izutsu’s Sufism and Taoism and it blew me away. In the Qur’an, the Muslim scripture, the story is touched upon, with an angel arriving just in the nick of time to tell Abraham to cease: “””And when they had both submitted and he put him down upon his forehead, 104. We called to him, "O Abraham. You have fulfilled* the vision." Indeed, We thus…
Re: Ancient Carthaginians did sacrifice their children (2014)
#195Child and human sacrifices were surprisingly common across the world. Many countries had to pass special laws to ban these practices - but it hasn't yet been rooted out.
Perhaps you could give some examples of where it still occurs, having not been rooted out. I'd be very interested as I'm not aware of any.
For example: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-39176570
Re: Ancient Carthaginians did sacrifice their children (2014)
#196Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's pretty clear. There was no love lost between the Jews and Romans. The civilizations developed independently, and the survival of Judaism required rejection of the Roman world view in most things.
I don’t know. My reading of ancient anti-Christian polemic seems to show that Greeks and Romans familiarized themselves with Jewish sources enough to use them to bolster their arguments. One example being the story of Jesus having been fathered by a Roman soldier named Pantera.
Re: Ancient Carthaginians did sacrifice their children (2014)
#197Child and human sacrifices were surprisingly common across the world. Many countries had to pass special laws to ban these practices - but it hasn't yet been rooted out.
Re: Ancient Carthaginians did sacrifice their children (2014)
#198Which is more likely: ancient people sacificing their children, or ancient writers wanting to mess with future historians or simply writing horror?
This difference needs to be taken into account when thinking about various probabilities in the past.
Re: Ancient Carthaginians did sacrifice their children (2014)
#199Which is more likely: ancient people sacificing their children, or ancient writers wanting to mess with future historians or simply writing horror?
You have it sort of backwards. These practices are only 'horror' by modern standards, it doesn't make sense to disregard history because we live by other values than an ancient civilization.
Re: Ancient Carthaginians did sacrifice their children (2014)
#200Which is more likely: ancient people sacificing their children, or ancient writers wanting to mess with future historians or simply writing horror?
In a society where tons of kids are born and half of them don't live to see their fifth birthday, children's lives are a lot less valuable than in the Western societies of 2023, where kids are something of a rare resource and they are expected to live full, long lives. This difference needs to be taken into account when thinking about various probabilities in the past.
But from a microeconomic point of view, children were more valuable in pre-industrial times. Most people worked in agriculture or the trades and lived in multi-generation households, and children were necessary to help with chores and eventually take over the main occupation and care for the elder parents. There was no retirement fund, just your children. Food and clothing were more expensive and childbirth was risky, so children represented a major investment. That they were sacrificed is a testament to how much value people placed on the ritual, not the lack of value of children. See also how valuable farm animals were sacrificed.