> Nonetheless: "Please submit the original source.
What's the 'original' source? One developer's specific problem with the Reddit API policy change?
> The discussion is the basically same as before.
Disagree. For one, it's active and on the main page. And, easier to jump in.
> No, that's actually contrary to HN policy:
That's for reposts. Our thread here is arguing whether or not it's a repost/dupe. I believe it is not.
> the other developer's link in the Kotaku article was also already submitted to HN
Ok? And with no discussion? But, again, this post puts it together, provides links to those sources, and tries to add some context.
You're saying this submission should not exist: "Please submitters, check before you submit." but I disagree and think it's valuable for providing more information, links to related content, and a place for new discussion.
Why does this post remain on the front page if it is so clearly a 'dupe'?
Why has the headline been updated by HN?
Heck, you've even made me think that second-day update posts should be encouraged on HN. First-day posts tend to lack a lot of critical information and a lot of knee-jerk/hot take reactions. As of now, has anyone from Reddit come out to refute or clarify the claims of the third party devs?