Live data from Hacker News

UK’s GDPR replacement could wipe out oversight of live facial recognition

theregister.com

81–90 of 160 posts

Re: UK’s GDPR replacement could wipe out oversight of live facial recognition

#81
post #8

Meanwhile, Sunak is celebrating himself with a nauseating propaganda video: https://twitter.com/RishiSunak/status/1660560546465193984 Look how clean and groomed our dear leaders are while they are surveilling the population and ruin the economy. Whatever it takes!

[deleted]

Re: UK’s GDPR replacement could wipe out oversight of live facial recognition

#82
post #67
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sadly the reject all became widespread as companies switched over to negating it by hiding "legitimate interest" toggles in multiple sublevels of expandables.

That used to work when it was just the cookie law, it doesn't work any longer. It must be "as easy" to opt in as it is to opt out, because of this dark pattern specifically.

Sure, there's the rules as written, and there's the actual behaviour of companies, and I think it's clear there's still a need for fines (and more of them) until companies start to comply and stop coming up with wishful workarounds to opt users in by default and then complain the law is unclear when they get smacked for an action that was clearly against the spirit of the law.

Re: UK’s GDPR replacement could wipe out oversight of live facial recognition

#83
post #19

This kind of thing was always my biggest worry going into Brexit. The country has to reimplement a ton of regulation and you know the government and its various hangers on won’t be able to resist “tweaking” every law and regulation to better favour them. Workers rights, human rights… it’s all up for negotiation now. By people who aren’t listening to you.

Could have been a great opportunity to try to actually improve things rather than adding loopholes for the benefit of special interests. Maybe with the right people in power that could still be achieved, but seems unlikely.

You didn't need Brexit to "improve" this kind of things, countries can already go beyond EU regulations on their own.

Re: UK’s GDPR replacement could wipe out oversight of live facial recognition

#84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Could have been a great opportunity to try to actually improve things rather than adding loopholes for the benefit of special interests. Maybe with the right people in power that could still be achieved, but seems unlikely.

I don’t know, you’re talking about a surveillance-crazy culture, I don’t see them shying away from facial recognition.

We love it. When we can't afford real CCTV, we hang fake cameras up practically as decorations. Asda even shows you a picture of your own face with a little green box around it to show they've got you and then allegedly just discards the data from it: https://fullfact.org/online/Asda-facial-recognition/

Even when it's legally dubious we'll do our damnedest to look like we're surveilling the ** out of you.

Re: UK’s GDPR replacement could wipe out oversight of live facial recognition

#85
post #8

Meanwhile, Sunak is celebrating himself with a nauseating propaganda video: https://twitter.com/RishiSunak/status/1660560546465193984 Look how clean and groomed our dear leaders are while they are surveilling the population and ruin the economy. Whatever it takes!

This doesn't seem like a productive comment.

Re: UK’s GDPR replacement could wipe out oversight of live facial recognition

#86
post #27
post #8

Meanwhile, Sunak is celebrating himself with a nauseating propaganda video: https://twitter.com/RishiSunak/status/1660560546465193984 Look how clean and groomed our dear leaders are while they are surveilling the population and ruin the economy. Whatever it takes!

Returning back to the OT of surveillance and oversight, and as you're making this into a partisan issue, what would Labour do differently? "Authoritarian" concerns were expressed last time Labour was in government [1], and they're "seriously considering" resurrecting their policy of mandatory id cards if they get in power again [2]. And, before I get smeared as a "Tory"/"Brexiteer", I am not - I'm someone who remembe…

[flagged]

Re: UK’s GDPR replacement could wipe out oversight of live facial recognition

#87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The UK isn't even scrapping the "bendy banana" law https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/bendy-bananas-brexit-uk-e...

The EU never banned bananas based on shape. It’s a myth

Oh, I thought they made it, but it was something the banana industry requested to have standards for trade.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/may/11/boris-johns...

I always thought "journalists" whipping up outage over something the regulated industry requested(!) should be absolutely ashamed of themselves. This kind of "reporting" was probably a contributing factor in anti-EU sentiment and ultimately Brexit.

Re: UK’s GDPR replacement could wipe out oversight of live facial recognition

#88
post #27
post #8

Meanwhile, Sunak is celebrating himself with a nauseating propaganda video: https://twitter.com/RishiSunak/status/1660560546465193984 Look how clean and groomed our dear leaders are while they are surveilling the population and ruin the economy. Whatever it takes!

Returning back to the OT of surveillance and oversight, and as you're making this into a partisan issue, what would Labour do differently? "Authoritarian" concerns were expressed last time Labour was in government [1], and they're "seriously considering" resurrecting their policy of mandatory id cards if they get in power again [2]. And, before I get smeared as a "Tory"/"Brexiteer", I am not - I'm someone who remembe…

Authoritarianism is very much so bi-partisan in UK politics.

That said I do think the Tories have taken it to the n-th degree recently, though. It's unlikely that Labour would introduce new bills that are quite as heavy handed as the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 but I imagine they're unlikely to unwind what is currently there now.

Re: UK’s GDPR replacement could wipe out oversight of live facial recognition

#89
post #26
post #19

This kind of thing was always my biggest worry going into Brexit. The country has to reimplement a ton of regulation and you know the government and its various hangers on won’t be able to resist “tweaking” every law and regulation to better favour them. Workers rights, human rights… it’s all up for negotiation now. By people who aren’t listening to you.

the regulation is a joke anyway, so why pretend? same with gdpr and the so called online privacy. it’s all smoke and mirrors with an added serving of mixed anti-americanism and european protectionism. they should remove everything from the books until these things have heft. and if they can’t come up with something serious, why legislate in the first place? just for populism’s sake? (eg UK’s online safety bill)

What is heft in this context?

Re: UK’s GDPR replacement could wipe out oversight of live facial recognition

#90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What have the R̶o̶m̶a̶n̶s̶ EU ever done for us?

The single market? What? The single market. Oh. Yeah, yeah. They did give us that. Uh, that's true. Yeah. And the peace funds. Oh, yeah, the peace funds, Reg. Remember what Northern Ireland used to be like? Yeah. All right. I'll grant you the single market and the peace funds are two things that the EU have done. And the Erasmus programme. Well, yeah. Obviously the Erasmus programme. I mean, that goes without saying,…

[flagged]
Post reply on HN