Actually it's a bit more complex (but not much) than what is described: 1st party may need user consent when they will use personal datas for something that is not the intended service (legitimate use). For example, for a shopping cart: cookies are necessary for the service, so no problem. For fraud detection : no problem because it's a legitimate use. But if you start tracking with a user cookie what pages your user…
Stop whining about “The EU Cookie Policy” and improve your ways
21–30 of 272 posts
Re: Stop whining about “The EU Cookie Policy” and improve your ways
#22The vast majority of people DO NOT care about cookies nor do they care about trackers. However, there is a very real productivity loss with all the cookie prompts - both trying to implement them, getting around them, and the billions of people who have to click on them every single day. We've got to come up with a better solution.
Somehow the industry decided it's better to annoy your users with consent for 50 different trackers with the most in-your-face popup possible to cause users to reflexively hit consent instead.
Re: Stop whining about “The EU Cookie Policy” and improve your ways
#23The vast majority of people DO NOT care about cookies nor do they care about trackers. However, there is a very real productivity loss with all the cookie prompts - both trying to implement them, getting around them, and the billions of people who have to click on them every single day. We've got to come up with a better solution.
The author states this: > To make this very clear: user/visitor consent is only needed for data going to 3rd parties. All cookie laws, including GDPR and CCPA, allow essential first-party cookies to be exempt from collecting user consent before performing their actions. So your session tracking cookie on your site DOES NOT need a consent popup AT ALL. Most consent dialogs can be avoided, were it not that the surveill…
Re: Stop whining about “The EU Cookie Policy” and improve your ways
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
The author states this: > To make this very clear: user/visitor consent is only needed for data going to 3rd parties. All cookie laws, including GDPR and CCPA, allow essential first-party cookies to be exempt from collecting user consent before performing their actions. So your session tracking cookie on your site DOES NOT need a consent popup AT ALL. Most consent dialogs can be avoided, were it not that the surveill…
My bank doesn't use 3rd party cookies, but they have a modal wall you have to click through anyway that explains that they DO NOT use cookies. This is insanity. Their explanation is that users are so accustomed to these cookie walls that a site without one would feel suspicious and unsafe. I very much blame the EU on this, because the EU policy has solved NOTHING, tracking still happens just as before, except now use…
Businesses: implement rampant dark patterns to trick people into accepting tracking and data collection
Businesses: flood the internet with inane, obnoxious and blatantly illegal cookie dialogs
...
4ad: I blame the EU
(Hint: show me where GDPR says anything about cookies)
Re: Stop whining about “The EU Cookie Policy” and improve your ways
#25The vast majority of people DO NOT care about cookies nor do they care about trackers. However, there is a very real productivity loss with all the cookie prompts - both trying to implement them, getting around them, and the billions of people who have to click on them every single day. We've got to come up with a better solution.
>We've got to come up with a better solution. I've got an easy one for you: stop embedding google analytics and others. You don't need a cookie banner when you only have operational ones or better yet, none at all.
Re: Stop whining about “The EU Cookie Policy” and improve your ways
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
The author states this: > To make this very clear: user/visitor consent is only needed for data going to 3rd parties. All cookie laws, including GDPR and CCPA, allow essential first-party cookies to be exempt from collecting user consent before performing their actions. So your session tracking cookie on your site DOES NOT need a consent popup AT ALL. Most consent dialogs can be avoided, were it not that the surveill…
So why do even the official website of the European commission and the European parliament have a cookie consent button? One would assume that they are not "capitalist services".
Edit: And as the sibling said, in many cases it may be restricted to analytics and simple 'reject' suffices, which is at least better than some of the intricate dialog designs.
Re: Stop whining about “The EU Cookie Policy” and improve your ways
#27The vast majority of people DO NOT care about cookies nor do they care about trackers. However, there is a very real productivity loss with all the cookie prompts - both trying to implement them, getting around them, and the billions of people who have to click on them every single day. We've got to come up with a better solution.
You’re missing the point of the article. The banner is only needed if your business relies on handing over info about the user to 3rd party. And yes, it’s reasonable to make sure user knows about it. The fact that these pop ups are annoying is the fault of the creator, not the regulation. Try accessing Apple.com or iCloud.com. No cookie pop up, yet one of the most successful businesses in history. You don’t have to b…
Re: Stop whining about “The EU Cookie Policy” and improve your ways
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
The author states this: > To make this very clear: user/visitor consent is only needed for data going to 3rd parties. All cookie laws, including GDPR and CCPA, allow essential first-party cookies to be exempt from collecting user consent before performing their actions. So your session tracking cookie on your site DOES NOT need a consent popup AT ALL. Most consent dialogs can be avoided, were it not that the surveill…
So why do even the official website of the European commission and the European parliament have a cookie consent button? One would assume that they are not "capitalist services".
"We use analytics cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. You have the choice to refuse or accept them. Reject. Accept".
Those analytic cookies are not required for the functioning of the website, and those web sites are required to ask for your consent to gather any additional data.
Re: Stop whining about “The EU Cookie Policy” and improve your ways
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are already lists for ad blockers that remove those cookie notices.
I don't know how people can use the internet without an adblocker.
Re: Stop whining about “The EU Cookie Policy” and improve your ways
#30I believe there is also a lot of "cargo culting" where site admins copy what everyone else is doing without understanding the legal background.