Live data from Hacker News

Mullvad's campaign against EU chat control

mullvad.net

61–70 of 107 posts

Re: Mullvad's campaign against EU chat control

#61
post #38
post #24

There are an unusual number of comments from new accounts making disingenuous arguments on this post. I wonder who is behind the astroturfing. The answer to "what else should we do about bad people doing bad things?" is, of course how we usually catch people doing bad things: old-fashioned detective work. It involves taking reports of suspicious or illegal acts, interviewing witnesses and associates, requesting court…

> I wonder who is behind the astroturfing I noticed the same thing, but this really is a strange one since there isn't an obvious single party which would desire this legislation (from my limited view). External state-actors (e.g. China for proxy-policing), or non-democratic internal politicians/leaders (EU/EEA neo-facists?), is the only thing I can imagine.

> there isn't an obvious single party which would desire this legislation

Holy cow. Its amazing how the general public is so unaware of how the mechanism for lobbying for laws work:

This 'pedophilia! think of the children!' thing along with its accompanying laws came to the public agenda at the same time in both sides of the Atlantic. In the US, in the Eu at the same time. And separately, in the UK. With various celebrities pushing it and certain segments in the respective parliaments introducting it all at the same time. In the same fashion that laws like ACTA, PIPA etc were pushed.

Who wants it is pretty simple - the establishments want to spy on the citizens but they dont want the public stampede and ensuing fallout that laws like the Patriot act involves.

If you would have any doubts about it, just look at what the UK establishment and its politicians say - having gotten used to get whatever they want regardless of what they say, they are directly saying "Just give us backdoors" to encryption software producers without bothering with the hassle of pedophilia.

Which brings us to the below problem:

> China for proxy-policing

These people are able to commit all these evils, from patriot act to jailing whistleblowers, because the public rationalizes and justifies what they do and throws the blame and all the evils to outside just like you did.

It wasnt China who pushed the patriot act. It wasnt China who spied on everyone on the planet as revealed by Snowden. It was our own establishments. And as long as people like you keep diverting the blame to outside like you have done, those who perpetrated such acts will keep getting bolder.

...

Aside from all of these, there IS an actual party with a very specific interest that is pushing these laws, and the reason why it is doing this is so much sh*ttier than the above establishment reasons that you will want to gouge your eyes out:

https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/13/clientside_scanning_c...

https://www.thorn.org/about-our-fight-against-sexual-exploit...

Ashton Kutcher is a founder of something called Thorn that sells spying software to chat services. He and his partner Demi Moore are pushing this pedophilia law on the Eu in order to be able to sell spying software to chat services. At the same time they are lobbying for client side spying, ie, spying on people from their browser.

Washed up Hollywood actors trying to make money by destroying democracy...

Re: Mullvad's campaign against EU chat control

#62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

weak encryption is weak for everyone.

[flagged]

And thank you for your bootlicking.

I wonder if the irony of creating new accounts just to comment on the uselessness of anonymity is lost on you or not…

Re: Mullvad's campaign against EU chat control

#63

I am really worried about this. I feel completely helpless though, I am almost a 100% convinced this legislation will make it through. It will be the worst day in the history of the EU. Great to see this campaign though.

[flagged]

Account created 17 minutes ago? Can you hook me up with an astroturfing job feckmore?

Re: Mullvad's campaign against EU chat control

#64

I am really worried about this. I feel completely helpless though, I am almost a 100% convinced this legislation will make it through. It will be the worst day in the history of the EU. Great to see this campaign though.

[flagged]

Yeah. You can bet that they wont use it to spy on everyone for everything and they will use it only for 'pedophiles'. Just like how the patriot act only targeted terrorists...

...

The naivete is mind boggling...

Re: Mullvad's campaign against EU chat control

#65
post #30

Ha! I probably should get a mullvad account just to support them (even if I use my own VPN). Something that is not discussed much in Sweden is surveillance via the bank system. Banks have access to customers' transaction information and use it for two purposes: the "useful" feature of telling their customer how many of their purchases were e.g. food vs entertainment or house rent, and--of course--for advertising thei…

[flagged]

Do you have any proof of this?

Re: Mullvad's campaign against EU chat control

#66
post #15
post #6

Translations: First ad: Kid: Haha!! Did you send the photo to mom, dad? Dad's phone: Your photo has triggered our criminal activities filter. Your online services have been suspended and the police has been alerted. Caption: Create safe spaces online for children instead of making the internet unsafe for everyone. ... Second ad: First worker: Weren't we just supposed to look for sexual crimes and terrorism? Second wo…

This is what Microsoft and Google are doing already. This is why I don't backup my photos to a cloud any more.

And if you are worried, don't upload to a some smaller provider either because some of them might have fun looking at the backups of the things that people find to to sensitive to upload to Google.

Re: Mullvad's campaign against EU chat control

#67
post #24

There are an unusual number of comments from new accounts making disingenuous arguments on this post. I wonder who is behind the astroturfing. The answer to "what else should we do about bad people doing bad things?" is, of course how we usually catch people doing bad things: old-fashioned detective work. It involves taking reports of suspicious or illegal acts, interviewing witnesses and associates, requesting court…

It’s likely just one person fwiw, HN is alarmingly bereft of anti-one-person-who-is-upset measures.

Re: Mullvad's campaign against EU chat control

#68
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I wonder who is behind the astroturfing I noticed the same thing, but this really is a strange one since there isn't an obvious single party which would desire this legislation (from my limited view). External state-actors (e.g. China for proxy-policing), or non-democratic internal politicians/leaders (EU/EEA neo-facists?), is the only thing I can imagine.

Foreign Malign Influence Center? They seem so hostile to free speech, I’d be surprised if they weren’t astroturfing stuff like this. https://mobile.twitter.com/NameRedacted247/status/1628847554...

That's a US entity, not EU. I have my skeptic goggles on too because the accounts and comments on that whole thread are a rat's nest of typical Twitter right wing garbage. There's even people tagging Elon Musk who seem to think he protects anything more than speech he agrees with.

Re: Mullvad's campaign against EU chat control

#69

Typical EU behaviour. Same ones constantly whining about how Swiss banks won’t adopt their financial surveillance policies. Governments love to call it transparency when trying to justifying violating other people’s privacy.

This is in no way comparable. There is a case to be made against rich people trying to hide their wealth in Switzerland, while they live in an EU country. They are also the majority doing it, as no average Joe can. Weakening cryptography with the excuse of going after a minuscule percentage of the population, is about effectively considering any citizen a potential criminal.

They’re comparable if your support of a policy doesn’t depend on who it’s targeted against. That’s what makes us different.
Post reply on HN