Earlier quoted context omitted.
Extreme labor inefficiency. Today Amazon's driver can deliver an order of magnitude more packages than a person with a wheel barrow could. There are 100,000+ Amazon drivers in the US. You'd need at least 1,000,000 people with wheel barrows.
That's true if we decide it's a good idea to continue to deliver millions of packages of small plastic goods every day. A big part of that is probably also due to the USA's massively isolating suburb design and poorly layed out roads.
Denver’s e-bike subsidy program produced more new riders, fewer car trips
161–170 of 170 posts
Re: Denver’s e-bike subsidy program produced more new riders, fewer car trips
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
The NYPD does pretty regular publicity about taking these off the road. Which would be fine if they did anything at all about protecting vulnerable users from motor vehicles. https://nyc.streetsblog.org/2021/11/29/nypd-seizes-illegal-m... https://cleantechnica.com/2022/06/01/when-seconds-count-nypd... https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/the-nypds-new-efforts-to-pol...
I’m looking out my window and see two. I stand by the claim that it’s basically unenforced.
Re: Denver’s e-bike subsidy program produced more new riders, fewer car trips
#163I'm a huge fan of programs like this, but one thing that cities like Denver (especially Denver) need to be wary of are things that actively worsen bike commutes over time. I live nearby, and one of the things that is a frequent topic of conversation is how dangerous certain bike trails in Denver are due to assaults and muggings. This is a new phenomenon, and there are bike trails in Denver I wouldn't go near on an ex…
Re: Denver’s e-bike subsidy program produced more new riders, fewer car trips
#164Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’m looking out my window and see two. I stand by the claim that it’s basically unenforced.
How can you tell that they’re over the legal limit?
Re: Denver’s e-bike subsidy program produced more new riders, fewer car trips
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
How can you tell that they’re over the legal limit?
They look nothing like bicycles. Closer to a motorcycle or moped. If they count as e-bikes the definition is a bad one.
Is it possible that you just don’t like what is defined as legal?
Re: Denver’s e-bike subsidy program produced more new riders, fewer car trips
#166Earlier quoted context omitted.
They look nothing like bicycles. Closer to a motorcycle or moped. If they count as e-bikes the definition is a bad one.
They may be mopeds. Pretty broad definitions of what is legal in NYC. https://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/html/bicyclists/ebikes.shtml Is it possible that you just don’t like what is defined as legal?
Re: Denver’s e-bike subsidy program produced more new riders, fewer car trips
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
The major issue is safety. Bikers are much more (3.4x to 11.5x) likely to be fatally injured per mile travelled compared to people driving cars [1]. Better bike infrastructure is needed. [1] https://bicycleuniverse.com/bicycle-safety-almanac/
Yet despite that, the improvement in fitness from commuting by bike rather than car, is so great that switching to bike will statistically increase your lifespan in just about every city in the world. That’s after including the negative impacts of increased exposure to air pollution, and higher likelihood of being fatally injured while commuting. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/cycli...
Re: Denver’s e-bike subsidy program produced more new riders, fewer car trips
#168Earlier quoted context omitted.
> is so great that switching to bike will statistically increase your lifespan Yea but so can a large number of other activities that let you keep your car.
Well sure, if keeping your car is important to you, then do what makes you happy. For me switching to a bike meant more exercise without having to commit any extra time. Just swap on type of commute for another, duration didn’t even change due to congestion which is easy to cycle past. Given the US rather extreme obesity problem, I would suggest that it needs all the help it can get when it comes to improving fitness…
Re: Denver’s e-bike subsidy program produced more new riders, fewer car trips
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
Denver resident who routinely rides bikes on those trails--mind providing some citations on those so we can know where to avoid? I've never had issues with folks in underpasses while running/biking (mostly early morning hours or commute hours), but could imagine there being issues at different times.
made an account just to comment. i commute in from the highlands to rino about 3/4 of the year and do a bunch of trips to littleton or golden when not work commuting. used this program last year to get an e-bike and have been absolutely loving it (when there isn't ice or snow on the ground). most full on pedestrian trails are genuinely great, especially when helped by higher traffic. i do, however, avoid my most dire…
Totally. A year or so ago they installed a protected bike lane on 23rd st crossing 25 onto water st (to connect to the south platte river trail/REI), but then it snowed and people ran over all the rubber protectors because they couldn't see them. They've since added higher reflectors, so at least they learned from their mistakes! I have a bunch of the same style on 17th by Sloan's lake, so I feel decently protected from that area to the stadium and onto the south platte river trail.
Re: Denver’s e-bike subsidy program produced more new riders, fewer car trips
#170Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's true if we decide it's a good idea to continue to deliver millions of packages of small plastic goods every day. A big part of that is probably also due to the USA's massively isolating suburb design and poorly layed out roads.
So you think Amazon brings no value? I guess you never ordered anything from there?