I’m the sort of person who loves a solution without a problem and will devote months or years to it for zero result.
Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
131–140 of 277 posts
Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#132Why did Shopify of all companies do this? Who would give Random Joe’s Shopify Store the permission to use their webcam? This looks like an absolute waste of time and money and a very impractical thing to use in general.
There are niches in e-commerce based around specialized tools which require more permissions and user engagement than a basic store site. In some cases, such tools account for a significant portion of the total revenue. It's not surprising at all to me that Shopify would invest in this type of technology, and I would assume that other big players are doing the same.
Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#133Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Fundamentally, pleasing design is about repetition and consistency. Fundamentally, what makes design pleasing is super hard to reason about. If it was mostly about repetition and consistency, any webpage that used bootstrap or no css at all would be pleasing. If pleasing minimalism was very easy to pull off, nobody would take note of Apple products.
If instead of "very easy" would you be happy if I said minimalism is the "least hard" to pull off?
Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#134Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#135> Imagine, for example, opening your favorite brand’s website and being presented with a miniature virtual storefront. You could look at their most popular products as if you were standing on a sidewalk peering into their shop. I am imagining it, and it's worse than the current norm.
Storefront branding using "smart" displays has been a variation on the same regurgitated idea since 1908[1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selfridges#Windows
Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unfortunately it's stuff like this that's poisoned otherwise cool new tech for me. I can't help but wonder "how will this be used to advertise to me?"
One of the cooler takes of Bitcoin or "crypto" is that you can use native tokens to pay for visiting websites. A browser plugin combined with a lightning wallet for instance could enable a website to request a payment of any amount of Satoshis to view the site, or it will redirect you to a 402 error page. This generates a way of monetizing content without the need for ads or tracking.
Crypto-powered micropayments could potentially massively boost revenue for content creators, including socially valuable platforms such as news sites.
Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#137> Imagine, for example, opening your favorite brand’s website and being presented with a miniature virtual storefront. You could look at their most popular products as if you were standing on a sidewalk peering into their shop. I am imagining it, and it's worse than the current norm.
Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#138Cynical take: Seems like an excuse for Shopify to add eye tracking to product pages for ad analytics
That's the shop's data, not Shopify's.
Bias: my team at Shopify helps merchants launch their shop and get their initial sales.
Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#139Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because it's a tough sell to put a camera right in front of people's TV. IIRC, the only product managed to do this is Portal TV from Facebook... I actually tried something like this and talked to lots of potential users about this (during 2020 pandemic). But the willingness to pay for the camera is quite low.
I remember when the Xbox 360 was announced and the core idea is that you plugged all your media crap into it. Combined with Kinect, it screamed, “we just want to know what you’re doing.”