Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
111–120 of 277 posts
Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#112That said, the reason such things do/don't take off isn't about how cool they are, generally. It's about how useful they are.
Even for games, immersion and realism are secondary to gameplay. For most applications, it's hard to see how a "realistic window" is useful. A flat paper, paper-like screen is better to read off, for example.
Cool tech. Definitely worth exploring gaming potential. Not easy to apply to other uses. There's no benefit to making an online shop window more like a real shop window. Catalogue is what you want in any case.
Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
Brian may love patterns and minimalism, but I am Ryan and I love chaos and maximalism.
See, me personally, this is what I want in my medical device software. Gimme the data. I'll learn the six different modes for each button, and fly through that shit to find what I want. Sadly, we're training people to live with less control and a shallower understanding by presenting everything in these slim little interfaces. Minimalism elides .
Minimalism is a major factor for cognitive accessibility. If you build for the lowest common denominator then of course qualities like control must necessarily take a dive. If Google gave you more controls for search then it'd be better search, but then it wouldn't be as minimal anymore.
On software you have lots of room to hide complexity for the pro user, but that's not the case for hardware.
Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#114Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
Here's why minimalism has such staying power. Fundamentally, pleasing design is about repetition and consistency. Brian loves patterns, that's all there is to it. Good graphic appeal isn't a seasoning like salt which you can just sprinkle on by paying for a few better "designed" assets. Its possible to make really pleasing design out of parts that are individually seen as cheap and low quality. Its also possible to m…
> Fundamentally, pleasing design is about repetition and consistency. Fundamentally, what makes design pleasing is super hard to reason about. If it was mostly about repetition and consistency, any webpage that used bootstrap or no css at all would be pleasing. If pleasing minimalism was very easy to pull off, nobody would take note of Apple products.
Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#116Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#117This, alongside various privacy concerns of eyeball tracking, will likely nip this technology in the bud.
Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#118Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#119Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#120Cynical take: Seems like an excuse for Shopify to add eye tracking to product pages for ad analytics
Unfortunately it's stuff like this that's poisoned otherwise cool new tech for me. I can't help but wonder "how will this be used to advertise to me?"
Or lie to you? VR storefront eh? Bet the product will look a lot better than it actually does in real life.