Live data from Hacker News

How to own an airline in 3 easy steps and grab the TSA nofly list along the way

maia.crimew.gay

611–620 of 677 posts

Re: How to own an airline in 3 easy steps and grab the TSA nofly list along the way

#611
post #318

TIL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maia_arson_crimew > In March 2021, crimew was indicted by a grand jury in the United States on criminal charges related to her alleged hacking activity between 2019 and 2021. The charges were unrelated to the hack of Verkada. Her home and her parents' home were raided by the Swiss police at the request of United States authorities, and her electronic devices were seized. People used…

Wonder if she's on the no-fly list now.

Re: How to own an airline in 3 easy steps and grab the TSA nofly list along the way

#612

This is clearly on the darker side of gray-hat. Hate to be preachy but anyone seeking to emulate this sort of attack-finding should consider their ethical obligations as a computer scientist and follow best practices for responsible disclosure. It appears this was completely ignored here, including sharing stolen sensitive data of normal people with whoever can plead a case.

Hard agree here, with a qualifier.

Breaking into private S3 buckets because you are bored is not considered an appropriate “Step 1” by the _professional community_ (people who get paid to do this for a living) at large.

Among people who plan to be financially rewarded for their work and also not be in handcuffs, Step 1 is usually to “Get written permission”.

Re: How to own an airline in 3 easy steps and grab the TSA nofly list along the way

#613

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you use binary genders you use male or female ones and people tend to use the same pronouns once they start with them. If someone uses gendered pronouns you shouldn't take that to mean that's the one the subject prefers but rather that's the gender the person who wrote it perceived. If they truly don't care to perceive a gender then a 50 / 50 pick. When I look at it's picture I honestly couldn't tell you if I perc…

We don’t have to guess. They’re just openly transphobic. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34450709

[flagged]

Re: How to own an airline in 3 easy steps and grab the TSA nofly list along the way

#614
post #565

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Competing access needs: autists need regularity, ??s ("the category of people who go by it/its") need ... creativity? chaos? uniqueness? Those goals are at direct odds. (I'm going to presume here that crimew doesn't actually want to be considered an object, because we don't generally respect objects' pronoun choices. So calling them an "it" in the grammatical way would be paradoxically self-defeating; we call objects…

Yes, it's likely that I am more challenged by the grammatically incorrect pronouns than most neurotypicals in this thread, thanks for pointing that out. A lot of people who like to cry 'transphobic!' may wish to understand that there are people who need accommodation in our society other than trans people, and that heralding chosen pronouns as truly inviolable will sometimes make other people less comfortable. That s…

I fail to see how any of the mentioned pronouns are ungrammatical.

As for competing needs and such, in this case it’s as easy as using she/her (as maia lists that as one of its pronouns), in other cases it’s usually acceptable to use they/them or no pronouns at all. The only thing that is generally absolutely unacceptable is (knowingly) using the wrong gendered pronouns or using gendered pronouns when the person only uses non-gendered pronouns.

Re: How to own an airline in 3 easy steps and grab the TSA nofly list along the way

#615

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Guys doesn't refer to men anymore, it's now a neutral word that can refer to both genders.

A lot of people say this, and I WANT this to be true because I don't know of a similar term that really works. I don't think most women agree. When my best friend came out as trans, I struggled to come up with a good way to refer to everyone as a group in a "hey everyone" kind of way. I eventually realized it's a stupid concept all together and walked into the room of my now mixed gendered friends while shouting "SUP…

As I regularly remind people, "assholes" is a perfectly good gender neutral collective pronoun.

Re: How to own an airline in 3 easy steps and grab the TSA nofly list along the way

#616

I expected to read an article about actually owning an airline in 3 easy steps. :(

I guess we do need the verb 'pwn' after all :D

you're....actually right. I totally misread this headline. There were no context clues to help with the reading.

Re: How to own an airline in 3 easy steps and grab the TSA nofly list along the way

#617
post #225
post #129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

it isn't a guy and it uses it/its pronouns.

This is downvoted, but the homepage really does say "hello i am maia arson crimew (it/she)". I'd feel uncomfortable referring to anyone as "it" though, as there are some connotations with that :-/

I know someone who says... it's pronouns are "it"... and using that really does make me uncomfortable, I agree. I _think_ (it hasn't necessarily told me this directly) that the choice may be intentionally to make people uncomfortable... like, why shouldn't you be uncomfortable thinking about gender? Lots of people are uncomfortable with gender, why shouldn't you be too? I think of it as a sort of art project... I'm not sure if it would be comfortable with that characterization or not. It also understands that some people can't handle this and will accept "they" without being offended, but really prefers "it", so if you're its friend and want to make them comfortable.... (I still don't love writing it even here with anonymous referent!)

I thought it was the right that accused the left of being precious snowflakes who aren't able to handle being uncomfortable ever? Why should you being uncomfortable be a blocker to referring to someone as they prefer, right? Being uncomfortable is part of life.

Re: How to own an airline in 3 easy steps and grab the TSA nofly list along the way

#618

From the accompanying (and linked) Daily Dot article[1]: > On the list were several notable figures, including the recently freed Russian arms dealer Viktor Bout, alongside over 16 potential aliases for him. > [...] > Numerous names included aliases that were common misspellings or slightly altered versions of their names. For non-natively-Latin names, the US government is thorough to the point of hilarity in includi…

It’s bad in Canada too, where they don’t even use dates of birth, so small children end up caught on a no-fly-list: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/london/no-fly-child-redress-1...

"On Wednesday, Public Safety Minister Bill Blair said in the coming days, certain travellers, like Sebastian Khan, will be able to apply for a Canadian Travel Number, a unique number they will be able to use when they book a flight to distinguish them from people on the list."

Soon they'll give everyone a number so they can travel. And print it out in physical form too. And call it a passport.

That "solution" seems a bit backwards.

Re: How to own an airline in 3 easy steps and grab the TSA nofly list along the way

#619
post #174

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What? "It" identifies as an inanimate object? This neopronoun thing really is getting absurd.

I agree with you on this, but I feel a need to note that "it" refers to non-persons, not just inanimate objects. It's perfectly normal to refer to animals as "it", and it is also quite common to use it for babies (and even more common for fetuses). Not that this makes it any less weird to ask to be referred as "it", mind you.

I've also seen it being used to refer to aliens. What's wrong with letting people choose their pronouns?

Re: How to own an airline in 3 easy steps and grab the TSA nofly list along the way

#620

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah cause we should totally have a top secret no fly list

Maybe we should or shouldn't, but the potential victims of this aren't just some greedy corporation. Leaking the no fly list could cause irreparable harm to individuals whose names are on it or even similar, causing discrimination by employers and other organizations.

It also provides proof to the victims that they were on it. It may not bring justice from the same government that put them there in the first place, but spreading their stories may (hopefully) reduce its legitimacy and revoke the consent of the governed.
Post reply on HN