To me this signals that TikTok isn't sharing with the 3-letter agencies and they don't like it.
Bipartisan Legislation to Ban TikTok
341–350 of 445 posts
Re: Bipartisan Legislation to Ban TikTok
#342Earlier quoted context omitted.
That’s no different from any nation, though.
Which is probably why we'll slowly see the slow Balkanization of the internet. South Americans will go to South American properties. North Americans will go to North American Properties. Europeans will go to European properties. I even expect the Africans to see this Balkanization as a way to solve some of their problems with, at once, unemployment and security.
Re: Bipartisan Legislation to Ban TikTok
#343Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's been happening lower than the federal level. :) There seem to be reasons for it with substance. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/alabama-utah-become-latest-...
It makes a lot of sense for one gov to not want their BYOD policies affected by foreign (read adversary) countries. Cool. It doesn't make sense to cut TikTok from US civilian devices because: Land of the free, free speech etc etc etc. The other guy you replied to is correct, CIA/NSA et all don't like they can't swing their ducks into Bytedance servers and doctorate the content without exposing intelligence agencies M…
Re: Bipartisan Legislation to Ban TikTok
#344Earlier quoted context omitted.
we’re talking about the government not the Chinese people here but nice bad faith response
Maybe I'm misreading things ... let me try again based on your initial comment: > if you believe China is a dystopian state why would a Chinese tech product that isn't even allowed in it's international form within China not itself "dystopian" ^^ The classification here as "chinese" tech product is the first issue > imo the most dystopian thing about TikTok is the fact that China intentionally exports a highly addict…
TikTok's main power is creating associations. For example, CCP may dislike some US politician because he is a trouble for Huawei, so TikTok starts subtly pushing videos that associate that politician with bad stuff. In a few weeks 150 millions US citizens have a strong negative reaction to that politician. TikTok may do the same for targeted high-profile individuals, e.g. family members of congressmen or high rank CIA officers. That is an immense power.
Re: Bipartisan Legislation to Ban TikTok
#345Instead of banning Tiktok, how about enforcing proper rules and regulations that every social media should follow? Why not make a proper privacy that every people in US deserves.
Many people are probably glad that they are banning Chinese tech, but at the end it is gonna be superseded by Instagram which supply more data to three letter organization. The probability that three letter organization abusing our data is more than Chinese government.
Re: Bipartisan Legislation to Ban TikTok
#346Earlier quoted context omitted.
It would be a tough sell. Think of the children works so much better. Yet you admitted, another kind of services would "presumably not be banned by this bill because it lacks those social media features. Maybe it would be banned by another law, ..." which is in agreement with comments saying that this bill is targeted at Tik Tok. The irony is that the pedagogic aspect is secondary if those comments are right, but bec…
Basically, I don't think these US legislators are (as of yet) serious about combating the privacy and national security concerns centered around foreign apps. They're mad about TikTok specifically, probably because their own children have been watching/producing cringe on TikTok specifically.
On the surface it's about the kids. But congress is a social network with thought leaders and lobbyists, too. They ought to know the power those even bigger networks can have.
Re: Bipartisan Legislation to Ban TikTok
#347Re: Bipartisan Legislation to Ban TikTok
#348Earlier quoted context omitted.
SV failed to build social media products that appeal to Gen-Z so this is the "plan B". The only reason why TikTok is getting banned is because its popular. And the only reason why its popular is because US-based entrepreneurs seem to struggle building products that connect with users under the age of 30. The irony is there was a product, Vine, that filled this niche but it was ultimately killed by Facebook (who promo…
Vine was shut down before TikTok even launched.
Re: Bipartisan Legislation to Ban TikTok
#349Earlier quoted context omitted.
SV failed to build social media products that appeal to Gen-Z so this is the "plan B". The only reason why TikTok is getting banned is because its popular. And the only reason why its popular is because US-based entrepreneurs seem to struggle building products that connect with users under the age of 30. The irony is there was a product, Vine, that filled this niche but it was ultimately killed by Facebook (who promo…
Vine died (or was killed) before TikTok started. It was more outcompeted by Instagram and Snapchat iirc. https://www.theverge.com/2016/10/28/13456208/why-vine-died-t... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/TikTok
Re: Bipartisan Legislation to Ban TikTok
#350Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which is probably why we'll slowly see the slow Balkanization of the internet. South Americans will go to South American properties. North Americans will go to North American Properties. Europeans will go to European properties. I even expect the Africans to see this Balkanization as a way to solve some of their problems with, at once, unemployment and security.
I think you underestimate the footprint and influence that Meta has in Africa.