> "did transmit and cause to be transmitted by wire, radio, and television communication" Note to self: Remember to use only free-space lightwave communications to avoid committing wire fraud. Edit: Removed "fiber" because it looks too much like a wire and avoid being busted by outside1234!
The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]
21–30 of 748 posts
Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]
#22The opening phrase is killing me. What can "From at least in or about 2019" mean? Does it mean not before 2019? Does it mean 2019 at the latest?
Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]
#23So 4 counts on wire fraud and then also commodities fraud, securities fraud, money laundering and campaign finance laws. For the moment, if we set aside whether these will be proven, how bad does a stack of charges like this look for him if they are proven?
Quoted post unavailable.
How would we go about enforcing that?
Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]
#24"SAMUEL BANKMAN-FRIED" a/k/a "SBF," the defendant, and others known and unknown did combine, conspire, confederate, and agree together and with each other to commit wire fraud".
Does this indicate that they intend to charge more people in the organization under RICO laws? Or is that just standard legalese for any wire fraud case.
Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]
#25It should be noted that SBF is facing 165 years in prison.
Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]
#26Interesting wording. I am not a Lawyer but have had a lot of interest in this case and others like it. "SAMUEL BANKMAN-FRIED" a/k/a "SBF," the defendant, and others known and unknown did combine, conspire, confederate, and agree together and with each other to commit wire fraud". Does this indicate that they intend to charge more people in the organization under RICO laws? Or is that just standard legalese for any wi…
[0] https://www.popehat.com/2016/06/14/lawsplainer-its-not-rico-...
Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]
#27> "did transmit and cause to be transmitted by wire, radio, and television communication" Note to self: Remember to use only free-space lightwave communications to avoid committing wire fraud. Edit: Removed "fiber" because it looks too much like a wire and avoid being busted by outside1234!
That's considered "a wire" by the law now :)
Does it help that I've now removed the fiber?
Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]
#28So 4 counts on wire fraud and then also commodities fraud, securities fraud, money laundering and campaign finance laws. For the moment, if we set aside whether these will be proven, how bad does a stack of charges like this look for him if they are proven?
Quoted post unavailable.
Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]
#29The opening phrase is killing me. What can "From at least in or about 2019" mean? Does it mean not before 2019? Does it mean 2019 at the latest?
It means that they have identified acts back to 2019 but are not foreclosing on finding more acts earlier.
The “in or about” is separate, and means they found things that may have been in 2019 but are not foreclosing that those particular things may have occurred at a different time
Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]
#30So 4 counts on wire fraud and then also commodities fraud, securities fraud, money laundering and campaign finance laws. For the moment, if we set aside whether these will be proven, how bad does a stack of charges like this look for him if they are proven?
Quoted post unavailable.