Live data from Hacker News

DOE requires plans to promote diversity from grant applicants

science.org

81–90 of 140 posts

Re: DOE requires plans to promote diversity from grant applicants

#82
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

among my generation this has already caught on among some groups of young white women for "diversity clout" if that's a thing. they are all suddenly "bi" and put pride flags in their insta and tiktok bios. prove them wrong. p.s. there are doubtless plenty who are fr but there's a lot of bs too.

I don't mean this as snide as it sounds, but really, who cares?

My company counts participation in groups such as the LGBT employees group as part of your yearly review.

Re: DOE requires plans to promote diversity from grant applicants

#83
post #80
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's what you said the first time, and I get the irony. I'm just struck that you're taking such care in your phrasing to clarify to the folks here how you're not actually gay. That doesn't seem to you to cut against your point? You think your identity is important enough not to be ambiguous about it[1], but not important enough to maybe be worth checking to see if people are being fair about it? (Which at the end o…

Snide comment, painful to read. Why should he say something that’s not true just to make people think he’s gay? Your logic is flawed.

He literally suggested saying something not true to make people think he's gay. That's... literally the idea! Make the DOE think he's gay, so he gets the perceived benefits. If that was snide, it wasn't me being snide, it was the upthread commenter.

And that's exactly my point: you KNOW he's not gay (because of his careful phrasing), and you find it "snide" to suggest that anyone think he is, when he's not. You agree with him (and me!) that his identity is important and worth respecting. And... isn't that exactly what diversity policies are intended to encourage?

Re: DOE requires plans to promote diversity from grant applicants

#84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is making sure kids are well educated everywhere "affirmative action"? Surely everyone has the right to a good basic education regardless of where they come from?

> How is making sure kids are well educated everywhere "affirmative action"? Because the admission programs to the desirable schools at all levels utilize affirmative action to try to reach this end. Source: went to private schools my entire life. Saw affirmative action at every admission level (1st grade, 6th, 9th, undergrad, and grad school). Have plenty of friends today working in some prestigious jobs/industries…

>Because the admission programs to the desirable schools at all levels utilize affirmative action to try to reach this end.

I don't think you're addressing what the OP was suggesting. We should be making public schools desirable to go to. If everyone can get a decent education, you might have a chance of not having an affirmative action problem.

For example in Australia, wealthy private schools over funded. But the parents are already well off, they can fund themselves. Meanwhile there are public schools that are under funded. All that money should be going to public schools and building a great public schools system. The US probably has problems with the public school system too.

Re: DOE requires plans to promote diversity from grant applicants

#86
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does anyone have a strong rebuttal against DEI issues being a "pipeline problem" in tech? I remember about 5 years ago, Facebook issued a report about its diversity numbers, and it put partial blame on the pipeline problem, saying they basically couldn't hire enough qualified people of certain demographics, and the entire DEI community blew up with how incorrect that was. I specifically remember some ridiculous outra…

It is a pipeline problem, but there are very strong social and political vested interests that really don't want to admit it. The whole DEI industry leeches off productive companies by setting impossible standards of 50% female software engineers or perfect racial representation. If we admit that this is unrealistic, many DEI departments will no longer have a reason to exist. To tweak the popular Upton Sinclair quote…

>The whole DEI industry leeches off productive companies

I actually think it's a little more insidious than that. Large companies, already established in their respective industries, build what are competitive moats by employing the DEI industry. Scrappy start-up that has something intriguing to offer? Oh but you don't have a VP of Diversity and Inclusion (that you can't afford) and you don't have a plan for ... I don't know what, exactly. Well you're not part of the team then. Companies like Google, Amazon, and so on actually want this to continue because it stifles competition.

Re: DOE requires plans to promote diversity from grant applicants

#87
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is a pipeline problem, but there are very strong social and political vested interests that really don't want to admit it. The whole DEI industry leeches off productive companies by setting impossible standards of 50% female software engineers or perfect racial representation. If we admit that this is unrealistic, many DEI departments will no longer have a reason to exist. To tweak the popular Upton Sinclair quote…

>The whole DEI industry leeches off productive companies I actually think it's a little more insidious than that. Large companies, already established in their respective industries, build what are competitive moats by employing the DEI industry. Scrappy start-up that has something intriguing to offer? Oh but you don't have a VP of Diversity and Inclusion (that you can't afford) and you don't have a plan for ... I do…

> I actually think it's a little more insidious than that.

It's worse than that.

FB sent me and my cofounder a C&D for our side project, then wanted to hire me for their "black clique" in NYC to work on react ~2015 when i was working on brain computer interfaces at the time at a lab.

You know you are gonna get the "easy lay up", everyone there will know it too (I'm not the type to put much effort into studying for tech interviews and I have cheme background not compsi so i find the questions dull many times). And all of the "of color" people who play into it for their personal benefit just make it worse... (not to mention, even for a lot of these kinds of software jobs i had that weren't very interesting intellectually but paid alot, I pretty much vaped as much weed as I could just to make to lunch, and I would have played into all those sterotypes about black men as well...)

Fuck em.

Re: DOE requires plans to promote diversity from grant applicants

#88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>The whole DEI industry leeches off productive companies I actually think it's a little more insidious than that. Large companies, already established in their respective industries, build what are competitive moats by employing the DEI industry. Scrappy start-up that has something intriguing to offer? Oh but you don't have a VP of Diversity and Inclusion (that you can't afford) and you don't have a plan for ... I do…

> I actually think it's a little more insidious than that. It's worse than that. FB sent me and my cofounder a C&D for our side project, then wanted to hire me for their "black clique" in NYC to work on react ~2015 when i was working on brain computer interfaces at the time at a lab. You know you are gonna get the "easy lay up", everyone there will know it too (I'm not the type to put much effort into studying for te…

I get the sense that a lot of these people that push these initiatives would be the kind of people who get upset that Ireland is full of the Irish.

Re: DOE requires plans to promote diversity from grant applicants

#89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I actually think it's a little more insidious than that. It's worse than that. FB sent me and my cofounder a C&D for our side project, then wanted to hire me for their "black clique" in NYC to work on react ~2015 when i was working on brain computer interfaces at the time at a lab. You know you are gonna get the "easy lay up", everyone there will know it too (I'm not the type to put much effort into studying for te…

I get the sense that a lot of these people that push these initiatives would be the kind of people who get upset that Ireland is full of the Irish.

Ha, I have no idea what goes on in their minds. But it took a lot of energy to pretend to care all the time when i'm around those types (because they see that I have the same skin color, and immediately their expectations are primed).

Re: DOE requires plans to promote diversity from grant applicants

#90
post #82
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't mean this as snide as it sounds, but really, who cares?

My company counts participation in groups such as the LGBT employees group as part of your yearly review.

dang what is anybody who isnt in that group supposed to do?
Post reply on HN