Earlier quoted context omitted.
It does matter if it actually violates the TOS, or could be vaguely interpreted to do so I guess?
And how many times does a company claim you have violated TOS and then refuse to tell you how you violated the TOS? To act in this manner nullifies the TOS in my opinion.
In most cases, you will not be given details if fraud is suspected. The reason being that companies don't want to tell fraudsters how they got caught.