Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh no you can’t post hate on the internet, that’s clearly just as bad as causing someone to commit suicide.
KF is certainly quite hateful, racist, spiteful, etc. I just don't like when arguments devolve into unplugging each other the internet.
Kiwi Farms is down across all domains as DDoS-Guard terminates service
841–850 of 1001 posts
Re: Kiwi Farms is down across all domains as DDoS-Guard terminates service
#842Earlier quoted context omitted.
The pre-modern internet was a far more interesting place.
I was there and I cannot agree. I caution, in general, against mythologizing the past. It was a wilder place, but so was the Wild West. Is Vegas less interesting than Tombstone? I find it to be a different kind of interesting (and this one is far more convenient than what we had when it was AOL and BBSes).
Re: Kiwi Farms is down across all domains as DDoS-Guard terminates service
#843Is it too early to say the internet is done for because it's looking that way to me. keffals has given the government the recipe to kill off any website they want gone. I'm hearing that keffals creatures are now attacking TOR to get them to drop kiwi too. This isn't going to stop, 4chan is definitely next then every other site that isn't mainstream.
I don’t think 4chan is next. I believe the site has staying power because its users are anonymous. Anonymity means it’s very difficult for leaders to emerge which means it’s difficult to rally behind a particular cause. This means it’s difficult for 4chan to grow in influence as an organized force. It’s just a steady state of low-level chaos, which is good for containment. I’m also quite confident that the FBI monito…
Re: Kiwi Farms is down across all domains as DDoS-Guard terminates service
#844Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is not reddit, calm down on the snark and try to actually have a discussion if you're gonna go for it. Its easy to say those things for someone you dislike, but zoom out and look at the implications, you have a campaign pretty much asking cloudflare to stand aside and allow them to do DDOS attacks on a website which apparently won several lawsuits against them already(ill dig up the sources a bit later on when I…
> Maybe kiwifarms is all people say they are "All people say they are" is a site running coordinated harassment campaigns, including SWATing and bomb threats, though. Those are clear crimes. You can't seriously be arguing that CloudFlare or DDos-Guard or whoever shouldn't be allowed to choose not to do business with that sort of thing, can you? Like so many others here[1], your perception thing seems to be based sole…
Re: Kiwi Farms is down across all domains as DDoS-Guard terminates service
#845Earlier quoted context omitted.
> "Doxxing" doesn't restrict someone else's free speech. It just discourages them from conducting speech under their public identity. That is restricting their ability to speak freely - now they have to hide their identity for fear of physical violence!!!
So the free exchange of information is dangerous-- why stop here? There's a lot more protecting we can do
Re: Kiwi Farms is down across all domains as DDoS-Guard terminates service
#846I think it’s interesting that so many people see the danger in a Twitter “mob” effectively running Kiwifarms off the public, visible internet, without recognising that Kiwifarms themselves were a mob, with the precise goal of running people (including the recently targeted streamer) off the public visible internet too. The tactics were different, but the goal is effectively the same. The key differences are Kiwifarms…
Quoted post unavailable.
As for the second allegation, I haven’t seen any substantiation. But I do know that in some circles any discussion in any context (eg: school) about sexual identity with teenagers has come to be considered “grooming” so I’m a bit suspect about the choice of words.
Re: Kiwi Farms is down across all domains as DDoS-Guard terminates service
#847Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think it's worse than that. They aren't banned precisely because people are making money from it.
If Reddit were materialists to that degree then they wouldn't have banned popular gore subs. It's more likely the sub taps into a vein of black culture that happens to be interwoven with some violence, and Reddit tolerates it because they don't want to be seen as trampling out anything to do with black culture. Now if there were a sub dedicated to a popular genre of exclusively white musicians who occasionally livest…
>Now if there were a sub dedicated to a popular genre of exclusively white musicians who occasionally livestream themselves murdering their white "opps," Reddit would ban it in a heartbeat under their "glorifying violence" ToS policy
Not the same, but combat footage is a popular sub that's basically just watching brown people get bombed.
Re: Kiwi Farms is down across all domains as DDoS-Guard terminates service
#848Earlier quoted context omitted.
Even if that were true, and I think it's pretty doubtful to just attribute a suicide to some people who made fun of or harassed the deceased, it's a criminal or civil matter. If people on that forum committed a crime, let them face the legal penalties. Why should the website be made persona non grata by Internet companies? How many more are dead from activities on Facebook, Instagram, etc? Why is it that big business…
KF was made _for_ harassment, that's very different.
Re: Kiwi Farms is down across all domains as DDoS-Guard terminates service
#849Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
Providing information about how to source drugs (and even encouraging people to take them) is not the same as drug trafficking. Erowid is not the Silk Road. As for the second allegation, I haven’t seen any substantiation. But I do know that in some circles any discussion in any context (eg: school) about sexual identity with teenagers has come to be considered “grooming” so I’m a bit suspect about the choice of words…
Re: Kiwi Farms is down across all domains as DDoS-Guard terminates service
#850Earlier quoted context omitted.
In public, sure, but a website is explicitly private property, so the megaphone-DDoS move would in this case be trespassing and harassment. And the slippery slope is a real problem, no matter how much people call it a fallacy. As we’ve seen countless times in history, the distance from viewing some group as less deserving of freedom than you, and actively persecuting them is short.
Free Speech is more complicated than that, at least in the US. The Supreme Court held in Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center that simply being private property does not by itself allow the owners to restrict speech. > Over two decades ago, our state Supreme Court concluded that a privately owned shopping center that attracts large numbers of people to congregate in order to shop and take advantage of other amenities…