Earlier quoted context omitted.
Musk already admitted that he was very wrong about FSD and that it's not that easy. Sure his talk was dumb and a lot of people fell for it, but that's just how marketing works.
That is not how marketing works. Show me a reputable book about marketing that says: promise something that doesn't exist.
SpaceX, T-Mobile to connect satellites to cellphones in remote areas
391–400 of 496 posts
Re: SpaceX, T-Mobile to connect satellites to cellphones in remote areas
#392Re: SpaceX, T-Mobile to connect satellites to cellphones in remote areas
#393While I see the great potential in this technology, the collateral damage is the loss of places where one can truly disconnect. I just got back from 4 days camping at a remote mountain lake with zero phone coverage, and it’s one of the most incredible ways to fully recharge and step away from the day to day treadmill of the modern world. When we loose the possibility to completely disconnect, I at least, will feel a…
To everyone saying “just don’t bring your phone” 1) Camera: iPhones are about the best lightweight camera I’m willing to purchase 2) Navigation: Offline maps with details like slope angle are critical when traveling in the backcountry in winter. Yes I use paper maps too, but some things are much easier digital. 3) I don’t want to leave it in the car to get stolen. And about airplane mode. Yes “disconnecting is a choi…
So we should all be denied a new potentially life-saving technology, because of your own self control issues?
Also, take the SIM out (assuming you don't use an ESIM), give it to your spouse or put it at the bottom of your backpack as others suggested, or leave it at home/in your car. Emergency calls will still work.
Re: SpaceX, T-Mobile to connect satellites to cellphones in remote areas
#394Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Of course, Apple’s solution will likely only work with iMessage. If I’m in the middle of nowhere and need to send an urgent message I wouldn’t want to be worrying about whether the recipient had an Android phone.
If recipient does not have iMessage he will get it as SMS.
Re: SpaceX, T-Mobile to connect satellites to cellphones in remote areas
#395Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s $10 per month for my Garmin InReach which gives you emergency comms and let’s you upgrade to unlimited SMS and some other stuff for $60. I use it a lot and it’s very reasonable. Runs on Iridium.
I have a Garmin InReach too, but to say it’s “satellite phone internet” is a stretch. You can send little blips of data. There’s no phone service. Nor is there any internet service.
Re: SpaceX, T-Mobile to connect satellites to cellphones in remote areas
#396Earlier quoted context omitted.
> SMS makes it very hard to be anonymous. Not a good option IMO. How is that even related ? Silence is the equivalent of Signal over SMS instead of the usual Mobile Data: There is nothing by design in Signal to stay anonymous. E2E encryption are mainly there to prevent eyes dropping, not to provide anonymity.
I was simply pointing out Starlink supporting SMS is not good enough, even with layers like Silence on top.
Re: SpaceX, T-Mobile to connect satellites to cellphones in remote areas
#397Earlier quoted context omitted.
Fresnel zones are weird. Radio waves don't always behave like line-of-sight would suggest. So out on the water, you might be farther from the tower as the crow flies, but there may be less interference, obstruction, multipath error, etc.
Also, water specifically has good propagation characteristics. (Salt water is best, iirc.) At least, I think that's true for the longer wavelengths more typically used with HAM radio. I don't know if it holds for microwave-ish frequencies like cell phones would use.
Re: SpaceX, T-Mobile to connect satellites to cellphones in remote areas
#398More detail here: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/25/spacex-and-t-mobile-team-up-... "T-Mobile users will be able to use messaging, MMS and certain messaging apps, from remote points across the lower 48 states, Alaska, Puerto Rico and Hawaii and even some remote points in the water. Eventually, the service will work with voice, Sievert said. T-Mobile plans to include the service in its most popular mobile plans but did…
does this extend to TMobile based mvno’s like Mint Mobile? cant tell
Re: SpaceX, T-Mobile to connect satellites to cellphones in remote areas
#399Earlier quoted context omitted.
To everyone saying “just don’t bring your phone” 1) Camera: iPhones are about the best lightweight camera I’m willing to purchase 2) Navigation: Offline maps with details like slope angle are critical when traveling in the backcountry in winter. Yes I use paper maps too, but some things are much easier digital. 3) I don’t want to leave it in the car to get stolen. And about airplane mode. Yes “disconnecting is a choi…
> And about airplane mode. Yes “disconnecting is a choice”, but if the internet is just the flip of a button away, I’ve found I’m not able to keep that button off. So we should all be denied a new potentially life-saving technology, because of your own self control issues? Also, take the SIM out (assuming you don't use an ESIM), give it to your spouse or put it at the bottom of your backpack as others suggested, or l…
Re: SpaceX, T-Mobile to connect satellites to cellphones in remote areas
#400Earlier quoted context omitted.
To everyone saying “just don’t bring your phone” 1) Camera: iPhones are about the best lightweight camera I’m willing to purchase 2) Navigation: Offline maps with details like slope angle are critical when traveling in the backcountry in winter. Yes I use paper maps too, but some things are much easier digital. 3) I don’t want to leave it in the car to get stolen. And about airplane mode. Yes “disconnecting is a choi…
So in other words, you're annoyed at this new development because you have no self control?