Earlier quoted context omitted.
See what I mean about unproductive semantic debates? I recommend you just use the word the way everyone else does; that's what words are for, communicating What presumption! A few responses, are not indicative of the world, or even a majority opinion. They do not indicate "the way everyone else does", and in fact may be responses from people misusing the word! This seems more to be the case, for the responses either…
You introduced the word "hate" to the conversation. Yes, racism can exist without hatred. We can view an ancient dead civilization through a racist lens without hating the people we study. But, so what? This thread started from a specific example - segregated swimming pools. I don't know why you've written so much on this thread without actually discussing the issue. We know whites were angry about desegregating swim…
This is what I was referring to. I responded to a specific point, of a specific post, about a specific thing.
This happens all the time. It's how conversation works. Yet you continue to ignore context, continue to ignore what I was discussing, which I have reiterated in every single reply. Instead, you find fault that I was not discussing.. what? What you wanted to discuss?
I repeat again, and go back to my original reply, we must truly understand cause, to effect correction.
For some reason this appears to bother you greatly. All of your replies have been to posts of mine stating this. Apparently, you disagree?
Well, why even bother responding? You apparently don't care for cause, and get upset at targeted correction.
There's little else to say here.