A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent
181–190 of 509 posts
Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent
#182Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
>people sign a disclaimer about the risks, they can not be held responsible. This isn’t adequate in civilized countries. You can’t run an amusement park that severs the limbs of 1% of the participants under the protection of a disclaimer.
Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent
#183The answer from the federation is unconscionable. They blamed the boy and then said they could not be held responsible. Fuck off, a kid made a reasonable kid movement. If the robot wasn't ready to be around children, it shouldn't have been deployed around children. And there should have been a big red button that immediately everything, within reach of every player.
Are you really going to go for the "think of the children" argument...? Although I do agree with you about having an e-stop.
Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent
#184Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you consider how Chernobyl was handled it doesn’t seem that far off?
Wrong country, wrong establishment. Apparently a lot of you dont know the difference between USSR, Russia and Ukraine. Stay safe out there.
Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent
#185It's Russia we're talking about. In Russia, the default mode of answering any complaint is "it's your own fault, we're not responsible, go away". It's not only on the big political scene - it's everywhere, from a village grocery store to a national federation. If you admit any mistake and any responsibility for anything, you're an idiot and a "loch" (pronounced the same as Scottish lake, but means a person to be take…
Come on, there is no way they are that cartoonish.
1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ_PiXLVaJ8 (~45mins)
The second video is more serious but also rather interesting (clips from it became very popular at the beginning of the Russian invasion into Ukraine). It is a lecture from a Finnish University Professor whom spent most of his career in Intelligence specializing in Russian relations and now teaches intelligence and security. He talks extensively about the corruption hierarchies in Russia as well as Putin and Propaganda, well worth a watch (and more recent videos have been released since found on the same channel).
2. https://youtu.be/kF9KretXqJw (~60mins)
Operating under the assumption that the video isn't misrepresenting the cultural aspects of Russia I think we would both be surprised at how "cartoonish" things can be.
Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent
#186Earlier quoted context omitted.
Honestly, as someone that researches ML, this is my major concern. It isn't AGI that has the potential to kill us, it is current ML systems that can't handle OOD data and engineers put it in place because "that's the user's fault." Same reason we have Teslas crashing. AI safety might talk about AGI a lot, but their main area of research is modern systems and concerns over that. OOD data is really hard to deal with FW…
Genuine question: is Tesla’s autopilot crashing more often or more severely than human drivers?
The moment Telsa set expectations by proclaiming it as autopilot, they took the corresponding responsiblity to make sure it did not generate any scenarios which were unsafe. The moment they implemented features that allowed the attention of drivers to drift more than standard driving, they also took responsibility to make sure that the drifting attention of drivers did not place the system in an unsafe state.
This same issue applies to touch-screen interfaces in modern cars. Drivers could always stare down at their radio when there were tactile knobs and dials, but touch-screen interfaces now expect that because they've eliminated tactile feedback. Telling drivers 'just don't look down' misses the point, because it's the responisbility of the car manufacturer to not create a system where that added safety risk is not controlled appropriately.
Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent
#187The answer from the federation is unconscionable. They blamed the boy and then said they could not be held responsible. Fuck off, a kid made a reasonable kid movement. If the robot wasn't ready to be around children, it shouldn't have been deployed around children. And there should have been a big red button that immediately everything, within reach of every player.
Quoted post unavailable.
The robot behaved in an unexpected way which caused injury to a child. An apology is the absolute bare minimum they could do.
As a parent, I think it’s perfectly reasonable to expect event organisers to have put adequate safeguards in place.
We don’t need to put kids in front of a bear to teach them about the wonders of nature. Likewise, they don’t need to be in the path of a dangerous robot to discover machines.
Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent
#188It's Russia we're talking about. In Russia, the default mode of answering any complaint is "it's your own fault, we're not responsible, go away". It's not only on the big political scene - it's everywhere, from a village grocery store to a national federation. If you admit any mistake and any responsibility for anything, you're an idiot and a "loch" (pronounced the same as Scottish lake, but means a person to be take…
Come on, there is no way they are that cartoonish.
Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent
#189It's Russia we're talking about. In Russia, the default mode of answering any complaint is "it's your own fault, we're not responsible, go away". It's not only on the big political scene - it's everywhere, from a village grocery store to a national federation. If you admit any mistake and any responsibility for anything, you're an idiot and a "loch" (pronounced the same as Scottish lake, but means a person to be take…
Come on, there is no way they are that cartoonish.
I think it's true that health and safety are treated very differently there.
The craziest part of the attached link is the quote "it's gone in the wrong direction again".
Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent
#190This is appalling. There is no world in which an industrial robot like that should be operating next to a child. Their force sensors are not nearly sensitive enough to stop before causing serious injury. Going fast enough, they can absolutely kill you. This just screams negligence to me. Cannot believe they tried to blame it on the child. There are robots, called Cobots, designed specifically for this type of environ…