My understanding is that the mRNA vaccines, in a round about way, trick the body into thinking it’s infected with the spike protein in order to trigger an immune system response. Is it really so surprising that one of the body’s many responses to viral infection is to alter reproductive activities? Skimming the article, I don’t see reference to other vaccines, but wouldn’t it be reasonable to assume they also cause m…
Trends in menstrual bleeding changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination
171–180 of 315 posts
Re: Trends in menstrual bleeding changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination
#172Earlier quoted context omitted.
> 1. That was only true before Delta. Posting a disputed study that I criticized to try and refute me, when I posted important 2022 followup data to viral shedding based on actual infectivity rather than just RNA copies indicates you either didn't read my comment or didn't understand it. > 3. It is true and the government admits that boosted and vaxxed have higher rates. Ontario source: I just knew you were going to…
How’s that study disputed? That study is not alone either. NEJM has similar studies too. Your link seems to be an outlier. Denmark, UK, Scotland, and other provinces in Canada also show the same higher rates in boosted and fully vaxxed than unvaxxed. Walgreens data for US also shows this. Look at page 3 of: https://www.walgreens.com/businesssolutions/covid-19-index.j... Canadian government seroprevalence data also sh…
Re: Trends in menstrual bleeding changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination
#173Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
With all due respect, I am not attempting to be rude with you and it would be nice to be afforded the same courtesy. As bluntly as I can say it - it will be years before we have peer reviewed studies published that detail the effect (or lack thereof) of the vaccines on pregnancy. It is an unknown and to pretend otherwise is dishonest. What we do know, though, is the outcomes of people who have covid stratified by age…
There is simply no plausible way for the virus to be less harmful to the population, or even just the ‘having a child’ subpopulation, than the vaccine.
Re: Trends in menstrual bleeding changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination
#174Re: Trends in menstrual bleeding changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination
#175"Vaccine trial protocols do not typically monitor for major adverse events for more than 7 days" I am stunned by this. Seven days? Is there really no reason to think that a vaccine candidate might have adverse effects more than a week later?
Quoted post unavailable.
Clinical trials do, indeed, last for longer: https://www.pfizerclinicaltrials.com/about/how-clinical-tria...
Here's a good overview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsfPOpE-GEs
Re: Trends in menstrual bleeding changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination
#176Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Healthy young people under 50 or even 60 were not dying or getting hospitalized. Lies, damn lies, and statistics. https://www.latimes.com/projects/california-coronavirus-case... By 35 and again by 50 your risk of death's increased. By 60 you're already seeing a disproportionately large amount of deaths.
Interesting how the Latino population in Age \ Deaths doesn't increase with age like the other populations What you said only applies to Latinos
Re: Trends in menstrual bleeding changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination
#177Earlier quoted context omitted.
> To toss in the requisite anecdata, my sister got pregnant this past fall. She was due for a booster but FUD about it hurting the baby swayed her mind. She got omicron in late December, post-covid complications nearly took her and the baby in late February, and she had to live in the hospital until she delivered in June. The tricky thing with this though is that, what if there is an unknown side effect due to lack o…
Quoted post unavailable.
Re: Trends in menstrual bleeding changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination
#178Re: Trends in menstrual bleeding changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination
#179Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
> If they tested for longer, they'd be less likely to sell their products Clinical trials do, indeed, last for longer: https://www.pfizerclinicaltrials.com/about/how-clinical-tria... Here's a good overview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsfPOpE-GEs
And every step of the way through those layers of filters, many drugs are rejected. Exactly what I was getting at.
It is certainly not your contention that COVID vaccines went through 3 or 4 phases of long term (years) of limited FDA trials is it lol?
1000s in 6 years = millions in 6 months? I think not, and I don't think you do either.
Having been able to circumvent long term FDA trials, obviously.... obviously.... It made it more likely than it otherwise would have been for the drugs to be approved.