Live data from Hacker News

Trends in menstrual bleeding changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination

science.org

171–180 of 315 posts

Re: Trends in menstrual bleeding changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination

#171

My understanding is that the mRNA vaccines, in a round about way, trick the body into thinking it’s infected with the spike protein in order to trigger an immune system response. Is it really so surprising that one of the body’s many responses to viral infection is to alter reproductive activities? Skimming the article, I don’t see reference to other vaccines, but wouldn’t it be reasonable to assume they also cause m…

That's why the j&j actually has proven to be better

Re: Trends in menstrual bleeding changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination

#172
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> 1. That was only true before Delta. Posting a disputed study that I criticized to try and refute me, when I posted important 2022 followup data to viral shedding based on actual infectivity rather than just RNA copies indicates you either didn't read my comment or didn't understand it. > 3. It is true and the government admits that boosted and vaxxed have higher rates. Ontario source: I just knew you were going to…

How’s that study disputed? That study is not alone either. NEJM has similar studies too. Your link seems to be an outlier. Denmark, UK, Scotland, and other provinces in Canada also show the same higher rates in boosted and fully vaxxed than unvaxxed. Walgreens data for US also shows this. Look at page 3 of: https://www.walgreens.com/businesssolutions/covid-19-index.j... Canadian government seroprevalence data also sh…

No post body was provided.

Re: Trends in menstrual bleeding changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination

#173

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

With all due respect, I am not attempting to be rude with you and it would be nice to be afforded the same courtesy. As bluntly as I can say it - it will be years before we have peer reviewed studies published that detail the effect (or lack thereof) of the vaccines on pregnancy. It is an unknown and to pretend otherwise is dishonest. What we do know, though, is the outcomes of people who have covid stratified by age…

With all due respect, you invited the eye roll.

There is simply no plausible way for the virus to be less harmful to the population, or even just the ‘having a child’ subpopulation, than the vaccine.

Re: Trends in menstrual bleeding changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination

#175
post #11

"Vaccine trial protocols do not typically monitor for major adverse events for more than 7 days" I am stunned by this. Seven days? Is there really no reason to think that a vaccine candidate might have adverse effects more than a week later?

Quoted post unavailable.

> If they tested for longer, they'd be less likely to sell their products

Clinical trials do, indeed, last for longer: https://www.pfizerclinicaltrials.com/about/how-clinical-tria...

Here's a good overview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsfPOpE-GEs

Re: Trends in menstrual bleeding changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination

#176

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Healthy young people under 50 or even 60 were not dying or getting hospitalized. Lies, damn lies, and statistics. https://www.latimes.com/projects/california-coronavirus-case... By 35 and again by 50 your risk of death's increased. By 60 you're already seeing a disproportionately large amount of deaths.

Interesting how the Latino population in Age \ Deaths doesn't increase with age like the other populations What you said only applies to Latinos

If I had to guess I'd say that the generally worse health outcomes for Latinos means that things just don't have that much room to get worse as they age. In terms of COVID vax rates among blacks and latinos is lower than it is amongst whites and asians so that's not helping. Look at how much higher the mortality rate is for younger Latinos… yikes.

Re: Trends in menstrual bleeding changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination

#177
post #168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> To toss in the requisite anecdata, my sister got pregnant this past fall. She was due for a booster but FUD about it hurting the baby swayed her mind. She got omicron in late December, post-covid complications nearly took her and the baby in late February, and she had to live in the hospital until she delivered in June. The tricky thing with this though is that, what if there is an unknown side effect due to lack o…

Quoted post unavailable.

Ad hominem attacks are banned here.

Re: Trends in menstrual bleeding changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination

#178
post #142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you studied for more than seven days, you might find problems preventing your mass rollout, and then where would you be

You'd be billions of dollars poorer.

Yes, that too

Re: Trends in menstrual bleeding changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination

#179
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

> If they tested for longer, they'd be less likely to sell their products Clinical trials do, indeed, last for longer: https://www.pfizerclinicaltrials.com/about/how-clinical-tria... Here's a good overview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsfPOpE-GEs

Exactly, yes. Through phase 3 according to your link would have been about 2 to 6 years. Testing for covid vaxes was nothing of the sort, additionally millions of people have received multiple doses as the drugs are in wide release, whereas normally Phase 2 would be maybe a few hundred and Phase 3 several thousand.

And every step of the way through those layers of filters, many drugs are rejected. Exactly what I was getting at.

It is certainly not your contention that COVID vaccines went through 3 or 4 phases of long term (years) of limited FDA trials is it lol?

1000s in 6 years = millions in 6 months? I think not, and I don't think you do either.

Having been able to circumvent long term FDA trials, obviously.... obviously.... It made it more likely than it otherwise would have been for the drugs to be approved.

Re: Trends in menstrual bleeding changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination

#180
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> and that's with 3 shots. i'm almost sure i would be in an ICU if i didn't get any shots. How could we prove this hypothesis?

It’s an anecdote, not a hypothesis.

> i'm almost sure i would be in an ICU if i didn't get any shots.

It's a meme really.

Post reply on HN