I'm struggling to understand the author's bias here (there clearly is one), are they claiming that the poor reflection on Japan as a democracy is:
- that the media has not reported an unsubstantiated 'speculation'? (sounds like good journalism?)
- that that politicians have religious beliefs? (separation of religion and state shouldn't forbid religious people holding office, just from mandating it)
- that the murderer was anti-religiously motivated? (sign of a hate crime)