Live data from Hacker News

Apple's claim is that it bans other browsers for security

twitter.com

221–230 of 593 posts

Re: Apple's claim is that it bans other browsers for security

#221
post #211

I'm really confused. I actively use Firefox as my default browser on my iPhone running iOS 15.5. I don't think Apple has banned other browsers at all.

It's basically a skin for Apple WebKit because Apple doesn't allow browsers to use their own engine.

Re: Apple's claim is that it bans other browsers for security

#222

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Indeed. can you imagine if Microsoft had made it so that IE was the only browser you were allowed to install on Windows so you couldn't install Netscape even if you wanted to?

This would have been fine if Windows wasn't 95+% of desktop computer market share at the time. The regulatory argument was that Microsoft was abusing their desktop OS monopoly to give themselves an unfair advantage in another market (browsers). By contrast iOS is ~50% of mobile OS market share (in the US, I think it's less elsewhere). Hardly a monopoly. If using a different mobile browser is important to you, there's…

This logic doesn't work with just two competitors globally. What if choosing my browser isn't the only thing important to me?

If governments give corporations with such overwhelming market dominance completely free rein then developers are nothing more than sharecroppers and consumers are going to pay the price either financially, in terms of privacy or through limited choice.

Re: Apple's claim is that it bans other browsers for security

#223

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Really? You mean people don't use Firefox because: - it protects what's important - you can "Personalize your experience with new colorways." - has Facebook Container - syncs across your devices Mozilla knows the actual engine isn't the deciding factor when trying to get people to change browsers. https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/new/

You're on about regular Firefox, not iOS Firefox which is just a UI wrapped around a WebKit component.

All of those features are possible on iOS via webkit.

Regarding mobile browsers specifically, their advantage over Safari here is blocking cryptominer scripts and autoplay videos: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/browsers/mobile/compar...

Re: Apple's claim is that it bans other browsers for security

#224

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> On the other hand, this denies me from using an actual Mozilla Firefox web browser on iOS. It denies you from using Gecko. You can use an actual Mozilla Firefox web browser on iOS.

"actual" Firefox absolutely means using their engine.

The average consumer doesn’t know the difference nor care. They want to open webpages and have them work.

Re: Apple's claim is that it bans other browsers for security

#225
post #137

Apple claiming security as a reason for monopoly, how classic. The EU's digital markets act bans the only Safari lock on IOS, so this is gone whether apple likes it or not. (1 - sorry couldn't find a better source) Safari is the new IE, there is a difference between a monopoly while still being able to use a competing product (like chrome in other platfroms), and forcing Safari(WebKit) while hindering the web because…

> Safari is the new IE, there is a difference between a monopoly while still being able to use a competing product (like chrome in other platfroms), and forcing Safari(WebKit) while hindering the web because of Apples interests.(2-3) Ehm. Chrome is the new IE. Apple is using anti-competitive methods but its far far away from market domination. Microsoft is doing even more, by pushing so much Edge-only stuff. On iOS A…

Both Safari and Chrome are the new IE's. Regulation should force folks to download a browser or have competing browser (with relevant competing engines) already pre-installed on both iOS and Android.

Re: Apple's claim is that it bans other browsers for security

#226

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So, you are happy to have Apple provide no user choice, because you fear a future where there is no user choice?

No; my problem is when people are using the "open web" as a bludgeon to get Apple to allow Chrome on iOS. If you want Chrome on iOS, just say that. To pretend that there is open future of browser diversity once Chrome is allowed on iOS is underhanded.

If Safari hadn't been lagging so far behind for years, I'm sure the sentiment to allow Chrome on iOS would be very different.

Re: Apple's claim is that it bans other browsers for security

#227

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not the "EU's cookie banners", it is the advertisers' cookie banners. The EU doesn't mandate cookie banners at all. It's the website's choice whether to pester users about having them accept targetting cookies. The most natural implementation of the EU directive would be to have a place in User Settings where users can go and enable targeted advertising if they want it.

>The most natural implementation of the EU directive would be to have a place in User Settings where users can go and enable targeted advertising if they want it. And why would we assume that these companies would follow the "most natural implementation"? The very predictable response of the industry to the EU directive was to make the cookie banners as annoying as invasive as possible, such that users would consent…

The cookie banners are still a net good: they make bad sites harder to read, turning people away from some of the worst examples.

They at least give you some measure of control, or legal standing, or at least visibility into how bad the web actually is.

Re: Apple's claim is that it bans other browsers for security

#228
post #119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On the other hand, this denies me from using an actual Mozilla Firefox web browser on iOS. Imposing an artificial limit on iOS isn't how the web will move forward. > Whatever you think of their decisions, Apple is the only thing stopping a 90%+ Chrome web. I don't see Apple making any effort to diversify the browser ecosystem by making their browser available on other operating systems, so their inaction on other fro…

> On the other hand, this denies me from using an actual Mozilla Firefox web browser on iOS. It denies you from using Gecko. You can use an actual Mozilla Firefox web browser on iOS.

Right, so you can use a Firefox-themed safari, nothing "actual" about it. Coming from Firefox on Android to Firefox on iOS, I can assure you the experiences are in no way similar. The main reason I even use Firefox on iOS is for the sync integration. I honestly can't think of another thing that Firefox is able to do on iOS that makes it "Firefox" at all.

Re: Apple's claim is that it bans other browsers for security

#229
post #119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On the other hand, this denies me from using an actual Mozilla Firefox web browser on iOS. Imposing an artificial limit on iOS isn't how the web will move forward. > Whatever you think of their decisions, Apple is the only thing stopping a 90%+ Chrome web. I don't see Apple making any effort to diversify the browser ecosystem by making their browser available on other operating systems, so their inaction on other fro…

> On the other hand, this denies me from using an actual Mozilla Firefox web browser on iOS. At the same time, most desktop computer users are able to use Firefox and we can see how often they choose to do so.

I don't use FF on desktop partly because I don't use it on mobile and so can't sync open tabs, bookmarks, etc.

Re: Apple's claim is that it bans other browsers for security

#230

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not misleading. Firefox, Edge and Chrome have all been banned on iOS. Instead Apple has forced them to produce separate browsers around a locked WebView that they exclusively control. Mozilla, Microsoft and Google have all spoken out against the ban in regulatory submission, and browser engineers at each vendor consider it a ban. The REAL browsers have been banned.

> Firefox, Edge and Chrome have all been banned on iOS. No they haven't! You can download each one here: [0], [1], [2]. They have been forbidden from using their own rendering engines. But they can still add all the chrome they want to the UI and do all their usual tracking like they do on the desktop. [0] https://apps.apple.com/us/app/firefox-focus-privacy-browser/... [1] https://apps.apple.com/us/app/microsoft-edge…

Good thing that regulation mentions browser engines and not the cardboard wrapping. You can use any browser you want as long it is ONLY Apple WebKit behind the scenes is a true dystopian fascist power-play.
Post reply on HN