Live data from Hacker News

Twitter Notes

twitter.com

271–280 of 316 posts

Re: Twitter Notes

#271
A lot of takes wrt walled gardens here and this vs threads, to which I could add my 2 cents. Facebook used to have its own things called Notes which was basically the same thing to this (longer format writing attached to your profile). In the years leading up to me launching my blog/personal website, I wrote about a half dozen of these Notes (this was like a decade ago, I was in my early 20s). It was a pretty good 'on ramp' to writing down longer sets of thoughts to share with people, much lower friction that launching a blog.

I doubt this is going to serve the same purpose for many people, but it might. Yes it is a walled garden, but I don't think it's meant as a replacement to a personal blog or Medium account (though tbh id much prefer this to Medium). I also have no doubt this will co-exist with Twitter threads, with the two having different strengths and weaknesses.

So, as someone who thinks Twitter is flawed but also very usable in a way that makes it quite good, I think it's a nice addition! We'll see if it survives - I kind of hope it does.

Re: Twitter Notes

#272
post #264

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To paraphrase you: tl;dr: skim-read good articles, dummy. Longer version: here’s a thoughtless snark ignoring that you said you wanted longreads and ignoring you wanted to dial complexity to 11. Society’s tuned to custard, get off my lawn. Extended version: I really like to show I am the smartest, most condescending, person in the forum. Let me state the obvious. Nobody listens or uses their brains these days, becaus…

Just gonna say that your original comment definitely reads like the tone that you’re pretending to have here, so it might actually just be you.

Fair point.

I was trying for a playful positive tone. I will try harder, but it is difficult, eh?

I suspect the difference I have with the person I answered is that the primary interaction I have with Twitter is links from HN, which are often short, relevant and to the point. I don’t see the flames because I’m not involved with the fire.

Re: Twitter Notes

#273
Long ago I thought Twitter was interesting, though at the moment I'm unable to precisely state why I thought so. I think it was perhaps the simplicity.

Twitter seemed feature-complete a long time ago. Handle scaling problems and the odd bugfixes, and you're good.

Sometimes I wonder what all their many thousands of engineers do all day.

(I understand they probably still need plenty of non-engineers to handle legal/compliance requirements etc of different countries.)

Re: Twitter Notes

#274
When things like these happen, a rehash of ancient internet idea presented as new again, makes me feel very sad, like the internet is old and dying or sth. I understand it's all about UX etc now , but i wish twitter's competitors did not just copy but instead tried to make their audience a little bit smarter. If the UX is not dumb-proof, you might not get hordes of users, but at least the ones who are there will have a bit of brains.

Re: Twitter Notes

#275
post #234

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Microsoft doesn’t provide a revenue number for Azure. Their entire cloud + server division accounts for 29% of overall revenue.

My bad, I was working from memory. I probably did an s/Microsoft/Amazon/ in my head.

Amazon disclosed in its quarterly earnings announcement that AWS revenue totaled $18.44 billion in the quarter [snip]. That works out to about 16% of Amazon’s total revenue.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/04/28/aws-earnings-q1-2022.html

Re: Twitter Notes

#276

Earlier quoted context omitted.

its not fast but I just use nitter.net instead

Yea i heard of nitter, i guess it would be easy to write a ghostmonkey script to redirect all twitter links there.

I use LibRedirect: https://github.com/libredirect/LibRedirect

Re: Twitter Notes

#278
Twitter got where it is cause the character limit helped people overcome writer’s block.

I think that the effect of this feature is that some people will start writing longer articles, never to finish them. So all in all less people tweeting. And that’s a good thing :-)

Re: Twitter Notes

#279
post #76

My reaction to this is that it's an effort to keep users within the "walled garden" of Twitter, which is not the best thing for those that write. Recall the story with Medium - yes, you get broader reach with less effort, but at the cost of giving up control of your content. I know that I am talking with an overly developer-focused lens (a-la "you can reimplement Dropbox in a weekend"), but self-hosting blogs outside…

People on internet seek engagement else why eve write a blog. Twitter is indisputably better for engagement.

Re: Twitter Notes

#280
post #191

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> twitter thought-leaders Real question. What even is a twitter thought-leader? An expert of twitter or an expert using twitter, or something else? If it’s an expert using twitter I would assume the way they use it would vary, so this must be something else?

The most famous got famously banned after a number of years of thought-leading.

And today's most famous is trying to buy twitter itself.
Post reply on HN