Earlier quoted context omitted.
> [...] it seems kinda disingenuous to me to tell users that they're more private because they use a VPN. Private from your ISP, sure [...] Bit of a contradiction there. It adds friction to at least some attacks against your privacy. That's better privacy. Nothing will ever be perfect, and VPNs can easily be oversold in terms of their benefits (especially since https became the norm). But they have benefits in some c…
> They accept cash and at least some other privacy preserving payment methods already. So why even allow "traditional" KYC-ridden payments at all? > Bit of a contradiction there. It adds friction to at least some attacks against your privacy. That's better privacy. The nuance is that you're just moving the problem. You're not private from Mullvad. You're just trading one ISP for a different one. I could have phrased…
Another way of saying that is that you've gained a choice. Most people have essentially one option for an ISP, but _many_ for VPNs.
> So why even allow "traditional" KYC-ridden payments at all?
To allow user choice. Many probably don't really care about that aspect and just want to bypass region-locks.