Live data from Hacker News

Our plans for Thunderbird on Android

blog.thunderbird.net

201–210 of 296 posts

Re: Our plans for Thunderbird on Android

#201
post #103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Note that Mozilla has nothing to do with Thunderbird anymore. Mozilla the non-profit owns the for-profit corp who owns Thunderbird. In their own words from the footer of https://www.thunderbird.net : > Thunderbird is now part of MZLA Technologies Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Mozilla Foundation.

... which is in conflict with the Thunderbird FAQ [1]: > Who makes Thunderbird? > Thunderbird is developed, tested, translated and supported largely by group of dedicated volunteers, plus paid staff. Thunderbird is an independent, community driven project. Therefore its paid staff, budget and fundraising are entirely managed and overseen by the Thunderbird Council, which is elected by the Thunderbird Community. Thund…

I wonder if the future of Firefox is becoming primarily a community driven project. I kind of hope so.

Re: Our plans for Thunderbird on Android

#202
post #140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, but it did change name and appearence in the move from what was Riot Android to when RiotX was launched and rebranded to Element

RiotX? I don't remember that. There was a TelegramX, maybe this is what you mean? However there was a couple years that I didn't use it much so perhaps I missed it. But it did go from Vector -> Riot -> Element and various UI and branding changes along the way yes :) Part of this is also that the app was not really "finished" back in the Vector days. It only really came into its own during the Riot age. For example E2…

The app that is now the Element Android app co-existed with the old Riot app for over a year as "RiotX". The rebrand and app changeover were timed together, so they renamed the RiotX app to the Element app and replaced the old Riot app with it in one go.

Re: Our plans for Thunderbird on Android

#203

As an aside, Thunderbird occupies that uncomfortable space of software that is libre, but seems so bloated and complex I don't want to install it, let alone work on it. I'm not sure if that perception is "accurate" (which of course depends on how you define things). But think of OpenOffice/LibreOffice. It's a huge, classically written C++ blob that is hard to check out hard to build and hard to contribute to. Yet, it…

How about a minimalist office suite and email suite written in modern C++ or Rust? Performance and responsiveness are important!

Sure, it's just there's a lot of distance between compiler and browser. I'd argue the first thing to do is write a browser in Rust (I know Firefox has real components in it).

Re: Our plans for Thunderbird on Android

#204

I get skeptical about acquisitions, but from what I can tell this actually seems like decent news. Thunderbird isn't acquiring K-9 to kill it or merge with an additional product, they're buying it so they can increase its development speed and then put their name on it. That seems to me like about the best acquisition goal that they could have -- basically saying, "what exists is good, instead of building our own thi…

If anything, the merger makes Thunderbird more accountable for the future of K-9 than they would be if they sponsored it. It is probable a net positive.

Re: Our plans for Thunderbird on Android

#205
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think the selling part is the problem (per se), I mean the app becoming something completely different after the acquisition, which users never consciously installed.

I've just learned (one benefit of not automatically updating everything) that the app I've used for syncing music from iTunes to my Android phone [1] plus the associated music player app have been sold to some unscrupulous developers who have apparently proceeded to immediately re-add ads into the paid-for (!) versions, re-adding the the file sync limits that originally only applied to the free trial version and thin…

Is it iSyncr + Rocket Player? I am in the same boat if so. Have the paid versions and don't see ads at the moment, but the "Rate Me" popups are a bad sign.

Re: Our plans for Thunderbird on Android

#206
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure which Firefox you're using, but the description you've laid out here doesn't match my experience at all. I've been using FF on desktop and android for years and have had no issues whatsoever. In what way do you feel firefox has been "left too far behind" ? There was a time when Chrome was faster by an ample margin, but it's no longer enough to be an important distinction. Between the privacy respecting f…

A full detailed list: https://caniuse.com/?compare=firefox+101,chrome+102&compareC...

I find the lack of nonsense API implementations to be a good thing

Re: Our plans for Thunderbird on Android

#207
post #176
post #94

I hope that someday I will understand why people like Thunderbird. It is unequivocally the worst e-mail client I have ever used, excepting some early, extremely buggy versions of alpine. I tried it again recently as it is only one of only 3 e-mail clients I found that could do exchange oauth2[1]. It's possible that its interface isn't as objectively terrible as it seems, but it is gratuitously different; if you are g…

Have you used the gmail web interface? How do you do bulk actions on emails? Clicking a checkbox for every single one? Having to write an run a query for each set of emails you want to operate on in bulk? Here's how I do it in thunderbird. Sort by sender (or other thing). Click first email. Shift click last email. Do whatever I want (usually archive or move to a folder). My employer turned off IMAP access a few years…

I used the Gmail web interface once in 2005 I think? I didn't include webmail in my assessment, or the office 365 mail client would have "won" this award.

Re: Our plans for Thunderbird on Android

#208
K-9 has served me pretty well over the last 8ish years.

It has remained beautifully lightweight (quite an exception for apps nowadays) and the biggest (yet perfectly tolerable) annoyance has been long lines not wrapping automatically.

I'm 9/10 sceptic about this cooperation and I'll be positively surprised if the future versions do not introduce lots of unnecessary bloat.

Re: Our plans for Thunderbird on Android

#209
post #208

K-9 has served me pretty well over the last 8ish years. It has remained beautifully lightweight (quite an exception for apps nowadays) and the biggest (yet perfectly tolerable) annoyance has been long lines not wrapping automatically. I'm 9/10 sceptic about this cooperation and I'll be positively surprised if the future versions do not introduce lots of unnecessary bloat.

Ah, here it's already announced, the bloat:

> Account setup using Thunderbird account auto-configuration.

Perfectly unnecessary.

> Syncing between desktop and mobile Thunderbird.

Duh, what exactly does IMAP do?

*shakes head*

Re: Our plans for Thunderbird on Android

#210
post #175
post #172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Though once manifest v3 is the only option, it's hard to say that'll really be as effective as uBlock Origin on Firefox: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...

That's an issue. I'm really puzzled my Mozilla's sudden aversion to an open repository of extensions on Android.

I think a lot of Firefox extensions are still broken on mobile. For example, I can't find a single tab manager / session manager that works on mobile
Post reply on HN