Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Is there a TV on the market without “Smart TV” features?

news.ycombinator.com

401–410 of 413 posts

Re: Ask HN: Is there a TV on the market without “Smart TV” features?

#401

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Excuse me, but I think I and I alone am the principle and indeed sole authority on what I enjoy. I drive my manuals daily in all kinds of traffic and weather. I live in NJ where neither the weather nor the traffic nor the roads are ideal. On the worst day, on the worst road, in the worst traffic, I still prefer to operate my vehicle rather than be carried by it. It's primarily a feeling of being involved and engaged…

Wait so you manually control the timing advance and the AFR in your car too? Because otherwise are you really even driving? Are we understaning my point yet?

"Are we understaning my point yet?"

You don't have one, merely some idiotic hyperbole.

Re: Ask HN: Is there a TV on the market without “Smart TV” features?

#402

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I got a projector. No "smart" bullshit, branding issues, or other obnoxiousness.

congratulations. a projector won't work for everyone.

You're welcome.

Re: Ask HN: Is there a TV on the market without “Smart TV” features?

#403

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lucky, them. In Germany every household has to pay it, because of "new media", meaning regardless of the (non)existence of classical TV, radio, there is probably internet, smartphone, some means to consume public tv and radio, so f---ing PAY ! Even if one can't stand that sh-t at all, and ignores it since 1996 :-) Meanwhile the president of France promised to get rid of it this year, probably this fall.

I don't mind these fees. It's better than collecting the same in taxes as it keeps the public broadcaster independent from political oversight, at least to a certain degree.

> It's better than collecting the same in taxes

No, it's much worse than taxes. Taxes are (at least in theory) collected equitably. TV/radio feeds are collected equally from everyone (except a couple of exceptions). If you have a low income you still pay the full fees. If you fall into one of the exceptions it is up to you to convince the fee collectors of that. Don't do that in time and you have to pay the fee anyway.

Not to mention having a second set of taxes with second set of collectors is just wasteful.

And don't tell me that this is about the TV/radio stations being independent of the government - the government is the one that decides on this fee so that changes nothing about the TV/radio stations incentives to not rock the boat.

And not to mention that a lot of these fees are not even used for providing "unbiased" news (which is what is used to justify them) but are funneled into private companies via sports licensing and other questionable entertainment.

Re: Ask HN: Is there a TV on the market without “Smart TV” features?

#404

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Many others would be frustrated if they have to compromise.

Most people see very little beyond 1080p

Resolution isn't the only thing that is is improving. If anything, resolution has pretty much flatlined with 4K at least for now (yes, there are 8K screens if you have too much money but the pay off just not there). Contrast and colors however are much more easily noticeable. Evene someome with bad eyes can notice the ugly grey that pre-OLED monitors call "black".

Re: Ask HN: Is there a TV on the market without “Smart TV” features?

#405
post #133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The AppleTV he recommended to use in its place has ads too I believe, through sponsored app placements.

> The AppleTV he recommended to use in its place has ads too I believe, through sponsored app placements This really is the most nitpicking anti-Apple comments I’ve seen in a while. A friend of mine had a TV that would randomly interrupt films and programs he was watching (even in the middle of an action sequence) and show an ad that was inserted by the TV software. Luckily only happened for about 6 months - I’m gues…

[deleted]

Re: Ask HN: Is there a TV on the market without “Smart TV” features?

#406

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wait so you manually control the timing advance and the AFR in your car too? Because otherwise are you really even driving? Are we understaning my point yet?

"Are we understaning my point yet?" You don't have one, merely some idiotic hyperbole.

Hey! You figured out how you sound, just took you a minute! Great job.

Re: Ask HN: Is there a TV on the market without “Smart TV” features?

#407
post #398

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> You want to buy a “monitor”, not a TV. I bought a TV for a monitor. 55" 4K curved Samsung a few years ago for about $600. It went down in price and is probably discontinued now because curved TVs are stupid. Never connected it to the internet, so it's not too smart. Also, a real "monitor" doesn't come with a TV tuner and this did.

I used one as a monitor once and found that the low resolution and 30 Hz display was painful to code on.

Mine is 4K and supports 60Hz, though I do run it at 30 because of PC hardware limitations that I haven't bothered to upgrade.

Re: Ask HN: Is there a TV on the market without “Smart TV” features?

#408

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Technically, they didn't pay... but they did send the display, speakers, stand, and Pi kit for review (I'm going to be integrating it into a new studio build—if I can get that to happen!). A silly distinction in some ways, but a distinction nonetheless. I explain how I accept different types of sponsorship / review samples in my youtube repo: https://github.com/geerlingguy/youtube#paid-videos--product-...

Sure, I only mentioned it because YouTube says that with a semitrasparent popup when video starts.

Yeah; I do that because I like to make sure I'm 100% transparent about the fact that I didn't go to the store and buy the device that's in the video.

A lot of content creators don't include any disclaimers if they were provided anything besides cash for a review :(

Re: Ask HN: Is there a TV on the market without “Smart TV” features?

#409

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Walmart stocks them during November for shopping season. The sceptre tvs are my go to for large viewing needs. If you are into perfect picture quality, it takes some settings tweaking to get to tolerable but in my opinion is ideal for just normal TV watching and video games.

Ah, I see. Is it always the same old hardware and software? Because if they suddenly start shipping with AdJank 0.2 you're back to square one.

It's as dumb as can be. There is no hardware for networking; caveat on this is I haven't cracked it open but my network is monitored and I have not seen a peep from it in 4 years. It can read media files from a USB or external drive which is nice. If you have a lot of devices to connect, you'd be best suited to get a nice hmdi switch, but I only have three so a nice universal remote and some cable management works just fine. -edited for spelling

Re: Ask HN: Is there a TV on the market without “Smart TV” features?

#410
I use a KAGIS U43IP7UHD for my XBox1X (games + Netflix) and recently had the "television license inspector" drop by.

The unit does not have any TV receiving hardware from the factory and therefore excludes me from paying a license here in Ireland.

The guy was both surprised and impressed I'd researched the topic!

Post reply on HN