Live data from Hacker News

Tesla investigation deepens after more than a dozen US ‘Autopilot’ crashes

theguardian.com

41–50 of 124 posts

Re: Tesla investigation deepens after more than a dozen US ‘Autopilot’ crashes

#41

Sometimes this stuff just seems like a government shakedown. The NHTSA and the Biden administration in general is bitterly anti Tesla https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-autopilot-fsd-bias-nhtsa-saf... (obviously a biased source -but worth a read)

So they appointed a person who cares about safety to be a safety advisor? How dare they.

Re: Tesla investigation deepens after more than a dozen US ‘Autopilot’ crashes

#42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I wonder how many people turn on traditional cruise control and then crash due to neglectful driving. That's what we should be comparing Tesla Autopilot against, we should compare it against the status quo. This is so disingenuous. Go on YouTube and search for people "self-driving" in their Teslas, then do the same for people doing anything remotely the same with standard cruise control. Tesla and its fanatics want…

Is this actually a problem with tesla marketing? Or is it a problem with people being dumb? An aircraft autopilot will happily fly you straight into a mountain. It just holds altitude and bearing. Everyone I know with a Tesla exclusively uses autopilot on the highway in between exits. I'm pretty baffled as to how some people think it's fully autonomous driving, and I'm dubious as to how culpable Tesla is for that ign…

> Everyone I know with a Tesla exclusively uses autopilot on the highway in between exits.

Tesla touts (and sells as a separate option) "full self-driving" capability. They tout that it can make turns on city streets, obey street lights, yield to city traffic, change lanes, park, etc. This is not intended for the use case of on the highway, well-supervised, between exits.

Re: Tesla investigation deepens after more than a dozen US ‘Autopilot’ crashes

#43
post #2

I wonder how many people turn on traditional cruise control and then crash due to neglectful driving. That's what we should be comparing Tesla Autopilot against, we should compare it against the status quo.

The fundamental problem is that Tesla's Autopilot is defective. It has repeatedly steered people into highway barriers, and sometimes has no clue which lane it's in or where it's going. See the opening of this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMvdI8nSAJE An Apple employee was killed by his Tesla, which always veered into a highway barrier after an OTA update (he was distracted one day and didn't prevent the cra…

What is the benefit of an auto-drive function if you have to pay constant attention to it?

Essentially, autopilot's main value proposition is that you don't need to pay attention to it -- and that's what makes it so dangerous.

Re: Tesla investigation deepens after more than a dozen US ‘Autopilot’ crashes

#44
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is this actually a problem with tesla marketing? Or is it a problem with people being dumb? An aircraft autopilot will happily fly you straight into a mountain. It just holds altitude and bearing. Everyone I know with a Tesla exclusively uses autopilot on the highway in between exits. I'm pretty baffled as to how some people think it's fully autonomous driving, and I'm dubious as to how culpable Tesla is for that ign…

It's both, and unless you have a solution to eliminating stupid people, then the tech needs to be regulated out of the market so innocent people don't get killed on the roads due to this stupidity.

[deleted]

Re: Tesla investigation deepens after more than a dozen US ‘Autopilot’ crashes

#45
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If this was happening as often on Volvos or GM vehicles don’t you think they would be looking into it too?

I don't. You rarely see crashes of other vehicles make the press, but with Teslas you do. Tesla articles get views because of both the Tesla haters and fanboys, makes financial sense for news sites to publish them. That increased press leads to increased investigations.

Tesla is building "full self driving" using a feature called "Autopilot". You're playing stupid but nobody is fooled by this sophistry.

Re: Tesla investigation deepens after more than a dozen US ‘Autopilot’ crashes

#46
post #2

I wonder how many people turn on traditional cruise control and then crash due to neglectful driving. That's what we should be comparing Tesla Autopilot against, we should compare it against the status quo.

> I wonder how many people turn on traditional cruise control and then crash due to neglectful driving. That's what we should be comparing Tesla Autopilot against, we should compare it against the status quo. This is so disingenuous. Go on YouTube and search for people "self-driving" in their Teslas, then do the same for people doing anything remotely the same with standard cruise control. Tesla and its fanatics want…

This investigation is on Autopilot, not the FSD Beta.

Re: Tesla investigation deepens after more than a dozen US ‘Autopilot’ crashes

#47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is this actually a problem with tesla marketing? Or is it a problem with people being dumb? An aircraft autopilot will happily fly you straight into a mountain. It just holds altitude and bearing. Everyone I know with a Tesla exclusively uses autopilot on the highway in between exits. I'm pretty baffled as to how some people think it's fully autonomous driving, and I'm dubious as to how culpable Tesla is for that ign…

Maybe all we need is a requirement for type certification on people's drivers licenses before they can drive a Tesla.

Doesn't Tesla have driver monitoring and a driver score? So to use autopilot, you not only have to roughly pay attention, but also be pretty good at driving in general to use the beta?

Or did they get rid of that? It sounded like a good compromise to me.

Re: Tesla investigation deepens after more than a dozen US ‘Autopilot’ crashes

#48
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a good question, and I'm dismayed to see the various knee-jerk reactions to it. Seems to get caught up in the pro/anti-Tesla/Musk/blah noise. No, thank you. Here's the thing - people get in accidents all the time when assistance features like ABS, lane keeping, traction control, TACC, good-old-fashioned dumb cruise control, etc. are actively altering the vehicle's performance and behavior. So when we consider Te…

> Why then is Tesla specifically being focused on? Because before Tesla launched the feature, "Autopilot" was known in the general consciousness to mean a specific thing. Autopilot is the thing on planes that lets the pilot do other tasks (like navigational routing). Other car manufactures are smart enough to not brand their cruise control as "Self Driving" or the like. If I sold a brand of drain cleaner under the na…

>Because before Tesla launched the feature, "Autopilot" was known in the general consciousness to mean a specific thing

Not that I agree with your statement, but the "general consciousness" would be wrong in that case.

Autopilot in most aircraft will gladly fly you into the side of a mountain or other aircraft.

Re: Tesla investigation deepens after more than a dozen US ‘Autopilot’ crashes

#49
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a good question, and I'm dismayed to see the various knee-jerk reactions to it. Seems to get caught up in the pro/anti-Tesla/Musk/blah noise. No, thank you. Here's the thing - people get in accidents all the time when assistance features like ABS, lane keeping, traction control, TACC, good-old-fashioned dumb cruise control, etc. are actively altering the vehicle's performance and behavior. So when we consider Te…

Most of these other implementations have radar and LiDAR. Teslas is the inferior solution. That’s why if you order one you see a disclaimer that it is vision only.

I think all the crashes involved in this investigation would have been radar. The vision only is really 2022+ year model cars (and possibly some late 2021).

Re: Tesla investigation deepens after more than a dozen US ‘Autopilot’ crashes

#50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I wonder how many people turn on traditional cruise control and then crash due to neglectful driving. That's what we should be comparing Tesla Autopilot against, we should compare it against the status quo. This is so disingenuous. Go on YouTube and search for people "self-driving" in their Teslas, then do the same for people doing anything remotely the same with standard cruise control. Tesla and its fanatics want…

Where is Tesla claiming that Autopilot is self-driving?

"Autopilot" = "Automatic Pilot" = "Automatic Driver" = My car drives me while I play games on my iPhone
Post reply on HN