Live data from Hacker News

Former U.S. congressman, operative pleads guilty to election fraud charges

justice.gov

691–700 of 889 posts

Re: Former U.S. congressman, operative pleads guilty to election fraud charges

#691
post #652

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure how this attack even works. You can't make up dead people; you have to know who the dead people are. You can't cast votes for random dead people; they have to be dead people from the precinct you're EJ'ing . I buy that you could get 1-2 votes cast this way, but not how you could cast a material number of them. Meanwhile, getting caught just casting 1 such vote is a guaranteed prison sentence. You can't h…

Why are you so incredulous about this topic? The OP linked two sources showing that it did clearly happen: https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/2020/11/05/did-a-dead-11... https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-54874120

What clearly did happen? Both of those seem to be refuting the idea that votes were cast for dead people.

Re: Former U.S. congressman, operative pleads guilty to election fraud charges

#692
post #689

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But isn’t there something poeticly sound about this? It’s kind like “the family that eats together stays together” and other platitudes like that. A nation that requires a heavy involvement in the whole process is going to value it more. In the states, we worship money and automation, so we automate it true point where very few are involved. And then we’re surprised when “win at all cost” incidents start to rise over…

It almost guarantees that the electorate won’t be consulted often, though. That’s something you can afford to do every 4 years, but not every 6 months.

I don’t know. Switzerland works the same way and they have votes more often than every 6 months. (Also the average German will vote more often than just every 4 years due to European, national, state-level and regional elections.)

Re: Former U.S. congressman, operative pleads guilty to election fraud charges

#693
post #673

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let me google that for you: https://detroit.cbslocal.com/2022/02/24/macomb-county-nursin... https://hotair.com/jazz-shaw/2020/11/12/texas-nursing-home-w... https://www.apr.org/2007-07-13/two-charged-with-voter-fraud-... https://ktla.com/news/nationworld/4th-resident-of-villages-f... https://www.tmj4.com/news/local-news/wisconsin-sheriff-wants... https://www.inquirer.com/philly/news/vote-fraud-election-sen...

If you're going to mock someone for not googling, you better come up with the goods: real evidence of substantial fraud in a quantity that would make a difference. Otherwise, keep the sarcastic BS to yourself. Please.

I feel like you missed the context.

upsidesinclude wrote:

> You find a bunch of people that can't or wouldn't vote and collect their automatically mailed ballots, fill them out and have them dropped off in boxes.

>That's one way to illegally harvest votes. One that almost certainly occurred in nursing homes around the country in the last election.

thenewwazoo replied:

> Citation, please.

This isn't about substantial fraud. It is about a very specific source of fraud that upsidesinclude said was likely to have happened.

Re: Former U.S. congressman, operative pleads guilty to election fraud charges

#694

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are right, you can't make people up, but this has happened throughout history by unscrupulous actors using either very old people or dead people and "casting votes" in their name for certain candidates. I remember seeing a few examples of this firsthand on twitter in MI where a candidate was over 100 years old(and was dead) and voted!

I'm not sure how this attack even works. You can't make up dead people; you have to know who the dead people are. You can't cast votes for random dead people; they have to be dead people from the precinct you're EJ'ing . I buy that you could get 1-2 votes cast this way, but not how you could cast a material number of them. Meanwhile, getting caught just casting 1 such vote is a guaranteed prison sentence. You can't h…

Not an expert here but my read is that they were looking at the electoral register, and falsifying votes from real registered voters that just didn’t show up on the day.

At least that’s what it sounds like in

> Beren and her accomplices from the Board of Elections would then falsify the polling books and the List of Voters and Party Enrollment for the 39th Ward, 2nd Division, by recording the names, party affiliation, and order of appearances for voters who had not physically appeared at the polling station to cast his or her ballot in the election. Beren took pains to ensure that the number of ballots cast on the machines was a reflection of the number of voters signed into the polling books and the List of Voters.

Re: Former U.S. congressman, operative pleads guilty to election fraud charges

#695
post #579

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Requiring Voter ID enables suppression. Specifically by making it harder for some people to vote. Consider the example of the polling station bus being targeted. Those people could have complied but because of their race were prevented.

> Consider the example of the polling station bus being targeted. Those people could have complied but because of their race were prevented. I take it you are talking about the incident you mentioned in another comment, in Louisville, Georgia, in 2018, in which African-American senior citizens got on a bus to take them to an early voting center, and then told to get off the bus and it didn't take them there? (Did the…

The retirement home belongs to the county. I see no claim the van does. I don’t know the details either but I can’t find any evidence to support your claims.

That is one example of literally dozens on that page alone. Many of them more concrete, with convictions.

Re: Former U.S. congressman, operative pleads guilty to election fraud charges

#696
post #30

Americans have a really tough time with the notion of materiality. America is such a big country that, as a matter of statistics, anything that can happen is happening. That doesn’t mean it happens often enough to call into question our basic systems. In this case it’s the right that fails to grasp materiality. Yes, people vote illegally, ballot boxes get stuffed, their is collusion, etc. No, it doesn’t happen often…

> No, it doesn’t happen often enough to undermine the integrity of elections in the aggregate. Nah election fraud matters pretty materially. If it werent for this rigged election, we would have never gotten the 1964 civil rights bill https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Box_13_scandal

Seems a stretch, the civil rights bill was JFK’s baby initially, and if JBJ hadn’t been president it’s pretty likely that another democratic president would have signed it, possibly Humphrey or McCarthy.

Re: Former U.S. congressman, operative pleads guilty to election fraud charges

#697

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Obviously you should only be able to get a mail-in ballot if you request it. But I live in California, and ballots are mailed out to all registered voters. While convenient, it's bonkers to do it at all, let alone in any state that, unlike California, has close elections.

I still fail to understand why the US has such a hard time figuring out the simolest of things: elections, healthcare, gun control... I mean almost all developed countries did figure those out ages ago. EDIT: Thinking of it, I'll add policing to the list. Made worse by the fact that even dictatorships solved it better then the US, totalitarian regimes tend to have better rules and control over law enforcement resulti…

Well for one thing there's 50 states. But also people are VERY individualistic and simply lookout for themselves and their interest at all costs. Why would a state send out ballots to everyone, because they know it works to get the people they want elected. It doesn't matter if it's fraud as long as they win. Why would a state delete 100,000s of thousands of active voters a few days before elections. Exact same reason.

Everything in the US is the way it is because it's best for SOMEONE, but rarely everyone.

Re: Former U.S. congressman, operative pleads guilty to election fraud charges

#698
post #583

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Similarly, no doubt voter suppression sometimes happens, but it seems unlikely it happens on a sufficient scale to change national demographic trends in voting, and there is no good evidence that it does. This is where we disagree. There is longstanding evidence for exactly this. It stretches back literally centuries. There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud . There is clear, established evidence of ongoing,…

There is certainly a history in the US of voting suppression targeted at racial minorities, especially African-Americans. (And although I am indeed not an American, my own country also has a history of racial discrimination in voting, also within living memory–the US is less unique in that regard that you seem to think it is.) However, if working class non-Hispanic whites appear to have been switching, over the last…

I mean just logically the shifting voting habits of a given demographic don’t demonstrate the absence of voter suppression. Those shifting preferences could be for any number of reasons, including suppression itself. We don’t know.

What we do know is that there is no evidence of meaningful voter fraud in the US.

We also know there is an established history of voter suppression and to a lesser extent election fraud.

With this knowledge I see no reason to enact Voter ID.

Re: Former U.S. congressman, operative pleads guilty to election fraud charges

#699

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> how they find the hundreds of people to monitor the dozens of polling places Do they pay them?

I think they are volunteers, not sure if they are paid a nominal amount so.

Yeah in Italy they are volunteers but they're paid a little (150 euros more or less) and have an extra day off at work after the elections too.

Re: Former U.S. congressman, operative pleads guilty to election fraud charges

#700

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Obviously you should only be able to get a mail-in ballot if you request it. But I live in California, and ballots are mailed out to all registered voters. While convenient, it's bonkers to do it at all, let alone in any state that, unlike California, has close elections.

We know it’s not an issue because if people were returning mailed ballots without the knowledge of the intended recipient, there would be a ton of people who would be logged as voting twice (once the mail in ballot and once in person or after requesting and submitting a replacement mail in ballot).

This was one of the issues in 2020. If a person voted in person, but a mail in ballot was received that mail in ballot was just rejected. Lots of politicians from one party were adamant about telling people who voted by mail to show up in person as well because the mail in ballots may not arrive in time. So there were millions of people with double votes where the mail in was auto-rejected. When analyst tried to nail down exact numbers or to audit specific instance it turns out the rejections we're not logged. The best they could do was determine, in some states, the number of people who requested absentee, but voted in person.

When contacting these people many claimed they did not request or receive the mail in ballot.

Post reply on HN