Earlier quoted context omitted.
This more or less seals Finland applying for NATO membership. However, adding new members requires unanimous consent from all existing members, so it's not guaranteed to be smooth sailing. Russia is also obviously deeply unhappy about this and will do its best to disrupt the process via direct and indirect pressure.
>However, adding new members requires unanimous consent from all existing members, so it's not guaranteed to be smooth sailing. I highly doubt that any of NATO's members will veto an application from Finland (or Sweden).
Finland will seek NATO membership immediately
321–330 of 1001 posts
Re: Finland will seek NATO membership immediately
#322Earlier quoted context omitted.
> If I were living in Finland, I'd feel safer (against external aggression) if the country was in NATO than if it wasn't Finland might feel safer once they're in NATO. The rest of NATO (and non-NATO states in Western Europe), perhaps not quite so much. Surely the risk of NATO being involved in any conflict only increases as NATO grows?
"Surely the risk of NATO being involved in any conflict only increases as NATO grows?" No, it diminishes. NATO is a defensive alliance. The more members it has with credible military spending (which Finland has) the higher the cost for Russia to invade.
A similar line of argument about alliances and treaties preventing war was used before the First World War. We all know how that ended.
Re: Finland will seek NATO membership immediately
#323(Aesop's fable of The North Wind and the Sun.)
Re: Finland will seek NATO membership immediately
#324Earlier quoted context omitted.
If there is a nuclear war because of this mess in the near future, then we will all see how did this work out for everyone on this planet. If you pressure a weakened nuclear power into a corner, what will they have left? Western countries operate under a false assumption that oligarchs/rich call the shots in Russia while it's the power/security forces who do, keeping oligarchs on a short leash. From that point of vie…
Nobody is pressuring Russia, that's Russian propaganda. They want to paint themselves as attacked and surrounded, but it's them attacking sovereign neighbors and trying to expand beyond their borders. Who would have any interest in invading Russia? China attacking from the east would probably make more sense than NATO attacking from the west, but I've never heard anyone suggesting that as a realistic event.
Re: Finland will seek NATO membership immediately
#325Re: Finland will seek NATO membership immediately
#326Earlier quoted context omitted.
If I were living in Finland, I'd feel safer (against external aggression) if the country was in NATO than if it wasn't.
> If I were living in Finland, I'd feel safer (against external aggression) if the country was in NATO than if it wasn't Finland might feel safer once they're in NATO. The rest of NATO (and non-NATO states in Western Europe), perhaps not quite so much. Surely the risk of NATO being involved in any conflict only increases as NATO grows?
What shall we give Russia this time? Then when they come for Poland or Romania, who do you suggest we offer to rape and murder?
Re: Finland will seek NATO membership immediately
#327Earlier quoted context omitted.
>However, adding new members requires unanimous consent from all existing members, so it's not guaranteed to be smooth sailing. I highly doubt that any of NATO's members will veto an application from Finland (or Sweden).
Quoted post unavailable.
It's not like the rest of the world is forcing USA to spend so much on military. Apparently USA just wants to be military superpower.
>We all know Russia will win.
I don't. There is no military victory in sight for Russia as long as supplies keep flowing to Ukraine. Putin can't back up but someone else can, even if they shared Putin's ideology because they can blame Putin for failure. War ends after Putin is displaced or dies.
Re: Finland will seek NATO membership immediately
#328Earlier quoted context omitted.
Again, you are just deflecting, trying to distract from the core: The neighbours of Russia do not want to be invaded by Russia, so they join NATO.
It could as easily be stated that nations join NATO in order to participate in NATO's war crimes, and share its war treasures. For the same reason that immigrants come to USA - because that's not where the bombs are falling. Both statements are valid, and have just as much evidence supporting them.
Re: Finland will seek NATO membership immediately
#329Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do large amount of Americans think that " We all know Russia will win."? Also, Finland builds its army? As in, NATO seems to be so eager on Finland joining cause they think they will gain something too.
I don't know, I'm not American, and don't care that much. I was referring to this part: > I'm just tired of the USA paying for everything when we don't have the money. Which seems to be one of the things that made the previous President the President.
I do believe Trump was correct to criticize the lack of defense spending by many NATO countries and I too think Europeans should largely defend themselves. Personally I favor a multi polar world and would like the U.S. to retreat so to speak.
Re: Finland will seek NATO membership immediately
#330Earlier quoted context omitted.
Honest question, how do I know that you saying this is not a typical response from a US-troll farm?
What does US gain from this?