Live data from Hacker News

Brutal OS reached milestone 4

brutal.smnx.sh

31–40 of 75 posts

Re: Brutal OS reached milestone 4

#36
post #25

What is that hardware in the cover image? Is it even real?

It looks cool but the keyboard is almost square, making it difficult to touch the keys in the top row while still resting your hands. A flat aspect ratio (like most keyboards have) would be better. It's easier to move your fingers over large distances horizontally than vertically; see also the piano keyboard.

No post body was provided.

Re: Brutal OS reached milestone 4

#38
post #27
post #26

Where is their "brutal toolchain" (not GNU, not LLVM) able to bootstrap build their OS from kernel to user space? (sarcasm). I wish they prove me wrong.

Working on it https://github.com/brutal-org/brutal/tree/main/sources/libs/... It as already has some neat feature like C2json

They are doing it the right way.

But we should not get ahead of ourselves, let's wait for them to fully self-bootstrap 'brutal' with their toolchain.

Re: Brutal OS reached milestone 4

#39
post #31

Very cool project, and i want that hardware badly... But... Please add some margin on your article before someone gets hurt

I believe that is a Soviet Project SPHINX system - a design for a smart home network that never actually got produced due to the fall of the Soviet Union.

https://blog.adafruit.com/2021/12/13/project-sphinx-when-the...

Re: Brutal OS reached milestone 4

#40
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The idea is to take all the concepts we like about UNIX and iterate on them. It's UNIX as if it was invented now. For example, let's have a C compiler but let's add lambda and a more complete type system. Or let's have a shell, but let's have full ide like autocomplete to it. Or instead of plain text, let's use JSON

A language like C but with lambdas isn't really C, not that that's a bad thing. I was a little surprised that a compiler was in scope given the amount of other work that needed to be written and (hopefully) supported, though I guess that's a different issue.

> A language like C but with lambdas isn't really C, not that that's a bad thing.

At that point, why not just use Rust?

Post reply on HN