Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does a credit card in fact verify age? Anyone at all can go buy a prepaid card at the grocery store, right?
> Does a credit card in fact verify age? Anyone at all can go buy a prepaid card at the grocery store, right? A prepaid card isn't a credit card. Payment processors can tell the difference between card types. You have to be 18 or older to get a credit card issued in your name (although you can add an underage authorized user to your card). And there are now other requirements needed if you're under 21 in the US, such…
Google will soon ask Australian users to show ID to view some content
181–190 of 208 posts
Re: Google will soon ask Australian users to show ID to view some content
#182Earlier quoted context omitted.
Any open source solution would be trivial to disable, by definition. Hence OP's point that pursuing this to its logical conclusion means banning F/OSS. (See also: Vernor Vinge's "Rainbows End")
>Any open source solution would be trivial to disable, by definition. Hence OP's point that pursuing this to its logical conclusion means banning F/OSS. And you think that you can't "mod" some proprietary application? The only exception is locked down devices so not only FOSS would be affected but also non locked-down and DRM devices, if UK or Australia will demand only DRM devices to exist so all laws are followed t…
Again, "Rainbows End" describes the end result quite nicely.
Re: Google will soon ask Australian users to show ID to view some content
#183Earlier quoted context omitted.
Fuck google play and install lineageOS with microg. You can install any play store app without geo restrictions.
I would have preferred that. But many apps - especially banking apps don't work on custom ROMs due to android's SafetyNet.
Re: Google will soon ask Australian users to show ID to view some content
#184Re: Google will soon ask Australian users to show ID to view some content
#185Earlier quoted context omitted.
Perhaps there is some Chinese influence in this governmental decision, as well. They benefit from normalizing oppression.
China and Australia are very close. China is Australia's largest two-way trading partner in goods and services, accounting for nearly one third (31 per cent) of our trade with the world. https://www.dfat.gov.au/geo/china/china-country-brief The CCP is evil.
Australia has multiple WTO cases running against China, and the Australian government frequently calls out CCP misbehaviour. In turn, China has placed tarrifs on higher value Australia products like seafood and wine.
It's similar to the Germany / Russia relationship, economically necessary but with frequently conflicting social principles.
Re: Google will soon ask Australian users to show ID to view some content
#186Re: Google will soon ask Australian users to show ID to view some content
#187Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would have preferred that. But many apps - especially banking apps don't work on custom ROMs due to android's SafetyNet.
It is a tradeoff, but you can login through browser (Firefox) from your mobile. Its a decent tradeoff for a regular usage.
Re: Google will soon ask Australian users to show ID to view some content
#188Earlier quoted context omitted.
Headline: Google follows local laws. Alternate-universe headline: Google uses monopolistic power to ignore government regulation for profit. Which do you prefer?
Byline: Uses uploaded validation beyond the scope of the law using their patented “improve our services” playbook. (from TFA) Google is going too far.
Re: Google will soon ask Australian users to show ID to view some content
#189Re: Google will soon ask Australian users to show ID to view some content
#190Although the title is correct, it's worth noting that Google is not doing this because it thinks it's fun to require verification. The Australian government is requiring google to take this action.
That's interesting. Is the Australian government requiring me (superkuh) to take action to follow their absurd laws for my dot com website too? I definitely have Australian users. I guess what I'm asking is if this is something Google is doing pro-actively to cover their asses after a general law was passed, or if the Australian government has explicitly contacted Google (alphabet) about this?