Live data from Hacker News

Analysis of the situation in Russia, claimed to be by an active FSB analyst

noteplan.co

131–140 of 275 posts

Re: Analysis of the situation in Russia, claimed to be by an active FSB analyst

#131

3 days to Blitzkrieg? - Fake.

Thats how blitzkriegs work

The first 3 days are critical. You need to smash a hole deep in the defence. Then gather logistics to carry on. however you are horrifically exposed until you shore up your flanks.

if you don't break the spirit of the defenders then you're in deep shit.

for what its worth, the german invasion of france almost failed, because the entire column got bunched up in the Ardennes. Had the french acted in time, the germans would have been destroyed.

Plus, because the french were so motorised it allowed the germans to piggyback on the infra.

Re: Analysis of the situation in Russia, claimed to be by an active FSB analyst

#132
This is virtually guaranteed to be a deliberate disiformation piece written by an actual FSB officer for that purpose. Maybe it's only intended for splitting the Western alliance, but it could also be used for a false flag attack to further justify Russia's aggression. Or, slightly less nefarious, it could be intended to "explain" if something went wrong with the occupation of a nuclear power plant.

In a war like that, people should not trust anything coming directly from an intelligence agency, whether published deliberately or allegedly leaked by a "whistleblower", unless it contains actionable and independently verifiable information. (Even if the latter is the case, by the way, it's the bread and butter of misinformation to mix less valuable real information with misinformation.)

I've also flagged this thread because it's clearly political and pointless discussing this on HN.

Re: Analysis of the situation in Russia, claimed to be by an active FSB analyst

#134
While it looks like it’s interesting, I can’t help but feel that the informational content is zero of maybe even negative.

There is absolutely no way for the lay internet user to corroborate one word of it that isn’t already public information. Whether it looks or feels plausible is also meaningless: it could “feel right” because it is, or because someone took effort to design it this way.

So best thing for me is to ignore it and forget I read it, lest something I read in it confuses me later for a reputable source.

I’m not saying it’s not genuine, it might be, just that to me it is 100% indistinguishable from a prank or psyops.

Re: Analysis of the situation in Russia, claimed to be by an active FSB analyst

#135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The dirty bomb thing isn't anything new, and definitely precedes this. Both google and bing have blocked all RT.com results here in Germany, duck.com luckily still lets me search for it. 2009: https://www.rt.com/news/the-price-of-mass-destruction/ >Ukraine’s security service has arrested a group suspected of trying to sell a container of radioactive material. Officials say there was enough of the substance to create…

Believing anything RT have ever written, especially about Ukraine is, to put it mildly, not the best strategy.

yes. lets believe cnn

Re: Analysis of the situation in Russia, claimed to be by an active FSB analyst

#136
post #74
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Putin is green screened into that video. His hand in particular cuts the microphone magician style.

no, this was a compression artefact in the low quality video. Check the high quality video: no clipping.

Look at his hand with the pen at 8:38-8:40, his palm, close to wrist, is definitely clipping into foreground

Re: Analysis of the situation in Russia, claimed to be by an active FSB analyst

#137
post #37

It looks genuine, but it could also be a fake written as part of Ukrainian information war. While everything in this article looks very plausible, it could just as well be written by an outsider with good understanding of Russian politics. In that case it could be a bit skewed to paint a more optimistic picture (or if you will pessimistic from Russia's perspective).

As mentioned a lot of places, Ukraine psy ops aren't as long. Longer = more chances for mistakes. This has been vouched for by multiple people with contacts in the FSB who all say this is most likely genuine. One of the people to vouch for it is a Bellingcat employee. It also mentioned a false flag op to make Ukraine look like it's been developing nuclear weapons. News just broke of that today from Russian media, ent…

> Ukraine psy ops aren't as long. Longer = more chances for mistakes

But this piece isn't really long in information density. What mistakes could be made? This piece says very little except asserting that Russia cannot win this war and that their intelligence analysts were duped into preparing scenarios they were told wouldn't be used in practice. This can be told in a single paragraph or stretched with prose and "color", which is what happened here.

The piece is very short in this sense, and has very little content that could be botched by mistake.

Re: Analysis of the situation in Russia, claimed to be by an active FSB analyst

#138
post #73
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Putin is green screened into that video. His hand in particular cuts the microphone magician style.

Those claims have been debunked, but hats off to Zelensky for trolling Putin on that one with his own mic move...

Check his right hand at 8:39 frame by frame: https://youtu.be/I3JpOy_fOmA?t=512

Re: Analysis of the situation in Russia, claimed to be by an active FSB analyst

#139

While it looks like it’s interesting, I can’t help but feel that the informational content is zero of maybe even negative. There is absolutely no way for the lay internet user to corroborate one word of it that isn’t already public information. Whether it looks or feels plausible is also meaningless: it could “feel right” because it is, or because someone took effort to design it this way. So best thing for me is to…

I found it interesting for the purely operational aspect: management ask for analysis without context, doesnt like answer so force better number, bubbles up for months to the top, war is declared on the basis of analysis, all is fucked because analysis was devoid of meaning.

Now, need to fix the shit and Z stands for Nazi, Zelensky is war hero, Chechens dont understand why they were erased even before killing one civilian and there s no way it ends with a win for Russia.

Love it cause even if completely fake, it's probably 100% true :D

Re: Analysis of the situation in Russia, claimed to be by an active FSB analyst

#140
post #69

Interesting: news[1] just came out of Russia accusing Ukraine of working on a dirty bomb. This makes the letter seem more plausible, if it really preceeds the news. [1]: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-without-evidence...

Russia has been a accusing Ukraine of working to acquire nuclear weapons, with US assistance, for quite a while, though the specification that they intend to produce a dirty bomb may be a new twist on it.

Adding to your comment, in the Munich Security Conference on 2022-02-19, Zelenskyy said:

“Ukraine will have every right to believe that the Budapest Memorandum is not working and all the package decisions of 1994 are in doubt.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFV5nw1UUNY&t=900s

That “Budapest Memorandum” is this one:

“Until Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons, it had the world's third-largest nuclear weapons stockpile, of which Ukraine had physical but no operational control. Russia controlled the codes needed to operate the nuclear weapons through electronic Permissive Action Links and the Russian command and control system, although this could not be sufficient guarantee against Ukrainian access. Formally, these weapons were controlled by the Commonwealth of Independent States.”

“Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has publicly commented on the Budapest Memorandum by arguing that it provides no true guarantee of safety due to Russia's coercive power. On 19 February 2022, Zelenskyy made a speech at the Munich Security Conference in which he said «Since 2014, Ukraine has tried three times to convene consultations with the guarantor states of the Budapest Memorandum. Three times without success. Today Ukraine will do it for the fourth time. ... If they do not happen again or their results do not guarantee security for our country, Ukraine will have every right to believe that the Budapest Memorandum is not working and all the package decisions of 1994 are in doubt.» Putin used Zelenskyy's comments as part of his claims that Ukraine could develop nuclear weapons. Critics have disputed Putin's claims. This treaty has since been violated by Russia at the outbreak of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum_on_Securit...

This might be what some interpret as Ukraine seeking to acquire nuclear weapons in the near future.

Post reply on HN