Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's definitely not trolling, that's just correct. We have nice laws and stuff, but it's not widely enforced and almost all websites do not implement these laws correctly. So why is it trolling? You also need to enforce it and make it hurt.
Twitter has convinced everyone on the Internet that people who have even midly divergent views about their government of choice are "Russian bots".
Google Tag Manager, the new anti-adblock weapon (2020)
761–770 of 902 posts
Re: Google Tag Manager, the new anti-adblock weapon (2020)
#762Also blocking every domain found on any blocklist including CNAME resolving.
And injecting my scripts trough mitm proxy that effectively disable any fingerprinting for my whole home network and all the mobile devices (they are all configured to use the proxy trough ssh tunnel).
Some sites dont work. Do you think I care? Do you think I will ssh home and change the settings for your site as it is so special, that I "need" to have its content? Every content is quadrupled on internet and if one site doesn't work, I go to next, I couldnt care less.
Someone doesn't want me to be his visitor? I will cry a river (not really), close the tab and find someone else while the site will have one visitor less.
(thank you hacker news for playing it fair!)
Re: Google Tag Manager, the new anti-adblock weapon (2020)
#763I'm the author, good to see this on HN, raising awareness on the topic I don't know who made the translation and when it was made, but the original article in french ( https://pixeldetracking.com/fr/google-tag-manager-server-sid... ) contains more information on recent GTM "improvements"): mainly on how you can easily change JS library names and detailed instructions on how to host your container in other clouds or s…
> I don't know who made the translation and when it was made This page was saved with SingleFile (I'm the author of SingleFile). Therefore, I can tell you that this page was produced on Tue Dec 08 2020.
Re: Google Tag Manager, the new anti-adblock weapon (2020)
#764Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thank you for making SingleFile, it's been an absolute lifesaver in a project I'm working on. I was having a lot of trouble trying to manually save pages with puppeteer but the singlefile CLI worked perfectly, even with added extensions. (To get extensions to work I had to add --browser-headless=false --browser-args ["--enable-features=UseOzonePlatform", "--ozone-platform=headless", "--disable-extensions-except=/path…
Thanks for the feedback! It's very timely, I just have an issue that discusses the problem of sideloaded extensions (and profile data).
Re: Google Tag Manager, the new anti-adblock weapon (2020)
#765Re: Google Tag Manager, the new anti-adblock weapon (2020)
#766Earlier quoted context omitted.
I will give it another shot. Unfortunately though, this does not solve the server-side GTM issue, right ? If the 3-5% of the website you use will start tracking via server-side GTM with the site's domain, you will not be able to simply use noscript to disable tracking ?
You're probably right, but then there are many factors involved - take Europe's GDPR, I'd reckon it'd be deemed unlawful under those regs but of course that doesn't help those of us outside Europe. It remains to be seen how Google's Tag Manager actually works and I'd be surprised if data from your machine is ignored altogether. If your machine says nothing about you then Google won't know who you are - unless you hav…
I think I can still load NewPipe through usb debugging but not able to have auto updates
Re: Google Tag Manager, the new anti-adblock weapon (2020)
#767This kind of data collection abuse is why I think we need more addons like AdNauseam [1]. Unlike uBlock Origin, it's not available from the Chrome web store anymore, which is a good sign that Google hates these types of addons more than they hate simple blockers. Blocking A/AAAA domains with custom URLs to prevent tracking is almost impossible, so instead let's flood the trackers with useless, incorrect data that's n…
Completely agree. Stuff like uBlock Origin is just online self-defense against hostile megacorporations. Maybe it's time we started going on the offensive by poisoning their data sets with total junk data with negative value. They insist on collecting data despite our wishes? Okay, take it all.
Re: Google Tag Manager, the new anti-adblock weapon (2020)
#768Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was about to reply that this is exactly what happened in L.A. in the 1940s and suggest that you look up the "Great American Streetcar Conspiracy", my favorite example of monopolistic conspiracy. But apparently much has changed since I last did that myself, and now the conspiracy seems to be little more than... fake news. Unless of course we're in the midst of a "Great American Streetcar Conspiracy"-Conspiracy Consp…
That is a bit of a misleading way of putting it. There was indeed a "street car conspiracy" and it even led to criminal convictions. The interpretation that this conspiracy was intended to kill off street cars is harder to justify since street cars were already struggling in the aftermath the great depression andany were bankrupt. I do think that the actions of GM et all did accelerate the decline of the street car b…
Re: Google Tag Manager, the new anti-adblock weapon (2020)
#769Earlier quoted context omitted.
> You walk through town looking for a vendor and notice a guy with a megaphone is yelling to the crowd about Gold Supply Inc offering better prices on pans. Which may be true. Or not. And they may be crappy pans, or not. And that's my point: all that yelling just muddies the water, it's like a mountain of 'fake reviews' and no way to pick up the signal any more because of all of the noise. Marketing mostly lies.
I don't understand your point? You think that the average person: - Be fully educated on every product and service available to them in every market they encounter - Spend the time to speak to N amount of people via word of mouth and understand how many N amount of conversations are required to have the confidence to buy the best product (in terms of value, feature set, price, etc.) for the item they're looking for -…
and
> Sorry but that is hilariously out of touch with reality...
are incompatible with each other.
Re: Google Tag Manager, the new anti-adblock weapon (2020)
#770Earlier quoted context omitted.
> a very English idea The UK didn't even have the worst public opinion of the EU in Europe on average. Public polling has generally shown other countries - including Italy, Greece and France - have an approximately similar (or worse) opinion of the EU than we did. There's a significant chance that Sweden would have ended up having a referendum on membership if we hadn't, but how terribly it's gone for us has put off…
> The UK didn't even have the worst public opinion of the EU in Europe on average. The UK is the only country where significant chunks of the elites kept explicitly advocating for (and are now putting in practice) a future outside the bloc. I'm Italian, and with all the usual complaints about this or that policy, Italian elites have never seriously considered backtracking on the project - because they all realize tha…
Farage's influence was minimal until he managed to position himself as the leader of the British anti-EU movement, which as far as British political movements go, was as close to a grassroots movement as it gets. Few of the mainstream Conservative political elite were pushing for Brexit until it became increasingly apparent that they were losing votes to UKIP based on the anti-EU sentiment that had been boiling under the surface for the better part of half a century. The nature of our political and voting system is that the two major parties tend to try and placate the extremes to diminish their influence. There's a lot to dislike about how that system works, but historically that has resulted in a relatively stable political system. Once this discontent reached a certain level, Cameron decided to gamble the future of the country to save the Conservative party, thinking they'd easily walk the referendum and kill the grassroots opposition - but despite almost every major mainstream political influence being on the side of remain, leave won.
There is clearly a certain amount of Russian influence, dodgy money and disinformation that pushed us that direction, but honestly I think it's overstated. Without it, maybe it would have gone 52/48 the other way, but clearly it was going to be very close no matter what. The EU has never sat right with a lot of people across the entire political spectrum for many of the same reasons it's unpopular with both the left and right in other European countries. I suspect if France was to have a similar referendum, the results would be similarly uncomfortably close - even if Frexit ultimately lost.
Arguably the main difference between the UK and other European countries is our political mainstream tends to shift more to placate the extremes and stop them becoming a mainstream force in their own right. This is evident in how UKIP/BNP/BXP are now irrelevant again and have no representation, whereas AFD, SD, M5S, RN and others are still significant forces in European politics. I would bet money that if we had a different voting system, Brexit wouldn't have happened. Whether or not our voting system's trade-offs are the correct ones or not is certainly debatable (and I personally vote for voting reform at any opportunity), but our system has served us well throughout history and one must always be careful about changing something so fundamental to a successful democracy.
What also emboldens the UK is that despite no longer being an Empire, it still is a very powerful country in its own right. Irrespective of how much of that power we dumped by leaving the EU, we're still permanent members of the UNSC, members of G7, FVEY, somewhere between #5 and #7 in global GDP, one of the strongest militaries, one of maybe two or three global force projection blue water navies, one of five NPT designated nuclear weapon states, one of the top countries for education, business and media output, have one of the world's two global cities, etc. If Sweden had a similar level of global relevance, the equation there might be substantially different too.
Another reason other countries haven't left the EU is that the EU was intentionally designed to make it hard to leave. This isn't a conspiracy theory, the people who wrote those protocols have stated such. Obviously part of the point of the EU was to make us interdependent so we don't start killing each other again.
> This is really a non-issue, EU institutions employ an army of translators and everything is available in any chosen lingo. The working lingua franca are effectively two, French and English.
Not only is this a huge waste of time (and thus I would argue reduces the overall quality of the output of EU institutions - which is certainly extremely poor compared to UK government resources), the quality of those translations were often questionable. It was not uncommon for me and European friends to find pages where the pages would say something subtly different depending on what translation you were reading.
But I would argue that it's not just about EU institutions, but rather for it to be a strong union you need to have an understanding about the domestic policies, culture and general goings-on within the other countries within the union. The UK has almost no cultural overlap with somewhere like Romania, which makes it hard for British people to accept that level of immigration and integration. Imagine every US state had a different language. Even if they also all spoke English as a second language, it's hard to imagine that would be as strong of a union as it currently is.
And of course, many EU citizens speak other languages, but most commonly they speak their native language, intermediate English and then sometimes a tertiary regional language (e.g. Finns speaking Swedish). NW continental Europe tends to be a bit better, with places like Belgium, Netherlands, Switzerland often being conversational in 3 or 4 languages, but that's not particularly representative of the whole EU. Europe is still very much a continent where people don't understand each other particularly well.
As for the UK intelligentsia not touching European press, bilingual ones certainly do - but in general, why would we? It obviously doesn't make sense to learn German to read BILD. Anything important gets translated into English, and between our own press and the rest of the English speaking world, we have access to more quality media and news than we could possibly hope to consume in our lifetimes. Such is the nature of natively speaking the world's dominant language: no other languages reach a critical level of importance that we generally ever bother to learn them well. Personally speaking, if I was to learn another language, it would be either Spanish or Mandarin, neither of which would probably help me out too much in European matters...