Earlier quoted context omitted.
But HOW do we know is safer? We should not assume is safer by default and I see many problems with Tesla fanboys numbers 1 the count for the times drivers intervene to prevent a crash are secret, or are not counted at a crash. 2 I don't want on my village/city some american car that is safer then the american driver that included 16 year old drunk teens and people that don't even have to pass exams and medical tests.…
> But HOW do we know is safer? We measure. This requires transparency on the part of Tesla, but if we frame it as "if you want legal FSD, you have to comply with transparency". We regulate like this in all other industries so there's no reason to think we can't do it here. > We should not assume is safer by default No one is advocating "assume it is safer by default". > I see many problems with Tesla fanboys numbers…
Good fucking luck, that's going to be harder than pulling Elon's teeth out.
Telsa has regularly lied about how well the system works, and will continue to do so unless we strong arm some independent verification on them.
And good luck getting that to happen. Governments roll onto their backs for Musk like it's the second coming of christ.
FSD should not be on the road without transparency. I don't want to get in car accidents because Musk wants to beta test crappy software.