Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Home Wireless Networking is still pretty much an unsolved problem for average consumers." What do you mean? Most consumers have a wireless router, and that works for their needs.
If you live in anything other than an apartment, your wifi connection drops considerably once a few walls and a floor are in the way. Mesh networks solve this by repeating the signal halfway to your hard-to-reach devices, although it must be done in an intelligent way if you want seamless band switching and its performance might be greatly improved with wifi 7's sensing capabilities.
The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communication (2021)
191–200 of 235 posts
Re: The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communication (2021)
#192Earlier quoted context omitted.
Another idea in the opposite direction: somebody should build a $20 firewall/tappable ethernet cable with some kind of builtin eBPF support + a universe of community packages. The community would then share privacy-enhancing I/O profiles for every kind of device. If years later e.g. my adversarial lightbulb pivots to brokering kompromat SIGINT, I want to filter that out, and I want not to be the first one to write a…
When I read this comment and the username that wrote it, I can't help but wonder if it's a reference to Neal Stephenson's Snow Crash.
Re: The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communication (2021)
#193There seems to be a lot of FUD about this. Make no mistake, the malicious and privacy invasive applications are already being used; they just don't follow a IEEE spec and aren't associated with WiFi directly. If a maliciously controlled router wants to track you it already can because your phone, smart watch, and laptop already broadcast themselves. This technology may not seem useful to the purpose of WiFi on it's f…
It's not FUD. There's nothing hypothetical about the danger.
Re: The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communication (2021)
#194(2021) privacy comments on Wi-Fi 7 standards work for 802.11bf, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.14918.pdf > it has been shown that SENS-based classifiers can infer privacy-critical information such as keyboard typing, gesture recognition and activity tracking ... since Wi-Fi signals can penetrate hard objects and can be used without the presence of light, end-users may not even realize they are being tracked ... individua…
Re: The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communication (2021)
#195Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you live in anything other than an apartment, your wifi connection drops considerably once a few walls and a floor are in the way. Mesh networks solve this by repeating the signal halfway to your hard-to-reach devices, although it must be done in an intelligent way if you want seamless band switching and its performance might be greatly improved with wifi 7's sensing capabilities.
My router is in the basement. Reception is great throughout the house, including the second floor, and even decent out in the garage or on the deck. Similar setup and results for my in-laws who have a massive house (3000-3500 sqft).
Re: The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communication (2021)
#196Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not FUD. There's nothing hypothetical about the danger.
The hypothetical in this is that this suddenly opens the door to RF-based physical sensing, when every attacker that can gain from this is already using it, just via custom equipment.
Re: The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communication (2021)
#197Earlier quoted context omitted.
My router is in the basement. Reception is great throughout the house, including the second floor, and even decent out in the garage or on the deck. Similar setup and results for my in-laws who have a massive house (3000-3500 sqft).
Many houses and places of business have walls or floors made with thicker material that block/hinder the waves - things like solid wood floors, brick walls or concrete walls can do a number on even 2.4ghz signals.
Even if that is a concern, I don't see sensing as being a benefit.
Re: The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communication (2021)
#198Earlier quoted context omitted.
So if I don’t want anyone taking a WiFi “photo” of me on the throne I should put up aluminum foil curtains?
Wear a tin foil hat. And take a photo of yourself anyways cause a guy on the throne with a tin foil hat on sounds hilarious
Re: The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communication (2021)
#199Earlier quoted context omitted.
And if everyone in the world setup TOR gateways and used TOR for everything then the survailiance and ad instry would collapse overnight. Back in the real world it would be frightingly effective.
Buying copper mesh from shop is far more accessible to average user than setting up TOR relay.
How do you know if your sepf made faray cage is leaking?
Are you going to get an expensive spectrum analiser? Do you know how to use it?
I can go on the street and find a random person who understands networking withing 10 minutes. I have never met a RF engineer in my life.
Re: The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communication (2021)
#200Earlier quoted context omitted.
802.11bf Wi-Fi 7 Sensing works with all frequencies, 2.4 and up. Even if Neighbor 2 turns off their router, Neighbor 1 could passively use the radio waves from Neighbor 3's router to surveil reflections from Neighbor 2, including keyboard typing, heartrate/breathing, location and physical activity. Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27123493
The problem with this neighbor-spying fear is that "complex math using data from radio waves to sense stuff" is already possible and readily available by anyone willing to study and put in the world of building it, wifi 7 isn't suddenly enabling that part of rf analysis or mathematics.
It makes it suddenly ubiquitous when all new WiFi devices use the new standard.