Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your argument boils down to “well the body learns what it looks like and so discriminates against similar looking viruses with more exposure allowing more targeted responses.” Under this theory, shouldn’t a natural immunity (as obtained from prior infection with alpha/delta) result in better immune response because it has learned “more” way to discriminate than the spike protein? Boosters seem inappropriate if the th…
It might, but you don't want to get natural immunity because that would mean getting sick first. Getting booster shots doesn't simply give you more antibodies, it gives you better ones; each round finds new ways to match the spike protein.
Regarding "better antibodies", that doesn't make any sense to me. More in number perhaps, but better? It's the exact same formula being given as boosters.