Good? What's the alternative? Have a crappy, paid-for, add filled, bloated app promote itself as "Cauliflower Cooker Lite - the #1 free cauliflower app. 100% ad-free". Metadata like file size, whether there are in-app ads or purchases, etc, should be part of the store's listing - not the title.
Tell HN: You can't add “no ads” in your Play Store app's title
61–70 of 165 posts
Re: Tell HN: You can't add “no ads” in your Play Store app's title
#62They don't want anyone questioning their ad revenue model I guess, nor their algorithmic ranking system...
Re: Tell HN: You can't add “no ads” in your Play Store app's title
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
The alternative I'd like is making common user expectations into formalized properties of the software, making them visible and searchable. Like how it lists "Offers in-app purchases" currently, it could also list "Ad-free", "Free", etc.
F-Droid does this already with its listing of 'anti-features' for each app.
Re: Tell HN: You can't add “no ads” in your Play Store app's title
#64Good? What's the alternative? Have a crappy, paid-for, add filled, bloated app promote itself as "Cauliflower Cooker Lite - the #1 free cauliflower app. 100% ad-free". Metadata like file size, whether there are in-app ads or purchases, etc, should be part of the store's listing - not the title.
Absolutely NOT! It's waaay better to have huge multinational corporation dictate what's right and what's wrong and what's good and what's bad! And they do it for you my friend! For FREE!
Re: Tell HN: You can't add “no ads” in your Play Store app's title
#65Good? What's the alternative? Have a crappy, paid-for, add filled, bloated app promote itself as "Cauliflower Cooker Lite - the #1 free cauliflower app. 100% ad-free". Metadata like file size, whether there are in-app ads or purchases, etc, should be part of the store's listing - not the title.
That's what we have on Amazon now. Looks like every single product contain all the metadata in product title. SEO spam from top to the bottom of the search results page.
I hate it, but given how crappy filtering on both Amazon and Play store is, I still prefer to see more information about a product in the search result list than less, even if that means bloated titles.
On the other hand, if both Amazon and Play store had usable filtering, all these bloated names would not be needed.
Re: Tell HN: You can't add “no ads” in your Play Store app's title
#66Re: Tell HN: You can't add “no ads” in your Play Store app's title
#67Re: Tell HN: You can't add “no ads” in your Play Store app's title
#68Re: Tell HN: You can't add “no ads” in your Play Store app's title
#69Good? What's the alternative? Have a crappy, paid-for, add filled, bloated app promote itself as "Cauliflower Cooker Lite - the #1 free cauliflower app. 100% ad-free". Metadata like file size, whether there are in-app ads or purchases, etc, should be part of the store's listing - not the title.
> Metadata like file size, whether there are in-app ads or purchases, etc, should be part of the store's listing - not the title. ???? Did I miss the part where Google announced they were adding searchable metadata at the same time they eliminated adding this info to the title? If not, seems like a clearly anti-consumer move.
Re: Tell HN: You can't add “no ads” in your Play Store app's title
#70I'm actually glad to see editorializing disallowed in app titles. If everybody did it, the store would be a mess. I mean, it's already a mess, but even more so.