Live data from Hacker News

Goodbye Brave

arunmozhi.in

191–200 of 252 posts

Re: Goodbye Brave

#191
post #154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He’s an open source enthusiast, not an idiot.

You're a GamerGate Enthusiast, an AntiVaxer, a Climate Change Denier, a Troll, and an Idiot.

After sinking so many hours into the sims 1, being insulted by its main programmer is probably the biggest honour I’ll ever receive. Thanks.

Re: Goodbye Brave

#192

Hi author, if you're here on HN please consider ditching sketchy extensions like Ghostery (sells your user data) and Adblock+ (participates in paid bypass of "acceptable ads" program) for the open-source and user-focused uBlock Origin ( https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock ). Also, if you haven't tried Firefox since the quantum days come back and give it another try.

What about PrivacyBadger and Disconnect? Are they even needed at this point?

I have a PiHole with a fairly huge block list (~1.2M entries) and uBlock Origin and I keep wondering if I stay only with them, will it be enough?

Re: Goodbye Brave

#193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Firefox is truly amazing today. I keep a chrome instance for Google docs which seems to work better there, the rest I do in FF which is better for everything else...

I just tried Chrome after jumping on FireFox bandwagon 2 years ago and honestly, I was not impressed. Chrome feels “jittery” while Firefox feels “snappy”. It’s the way a page loads. Hard to describe. Firefox is the top choice for me. I recommend it properly and not just for the sake of supporting Firefox. That said, please support Firefox. We should not be allowing Big Tech behemoths from taking away the window into…

> * I just tried Chrome after jumping on FireFox bandwagon 2 years ago and honestly, I was not impressed. Chrome feels “jittery” while Firefox feels “snappy”. It’s the way a page loads. Hard to describe.*

I am on a pretty powerful Mac and it's exactly the opposite, sadly. Firefox just... stutters. When downloading pages, when interacting with pages, it's there and it's super annoying.

Chrome in the meantime is just absolutely instant no matter what I do.

Doesn't help me wanting to stick with Firefox. :(

Re: Goodbye Brave

#194
post #52
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it's at least worth having the discussion about "acceptable ads". While reasonable people can disagree, I personally think that unobtrusive advertising that doesn't harvest your data should be a valid business model.

It is possible to do ads acceptably, but pre-loading a list of offenders who get around your choices is not it. If you want to do ads online, here are the initial rules of engagement: https://bostik.iki.fi/aivoituksia/random/no-stalking.html

FYI, when I tried to follow your link, Safari on Mac blocked your link with a warning that the certificate is invalid. Oddly, the "details" section (which helpfully cannot be cut-and-pasted) mentioned that "the website's certificate will be valid 0 days from now". I'm guessing this means there is a clock or timezone error, either on your end or my laptop. Ignore or look into at your option.

Re: Goodbye Brave

#195
post #76
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can't pick out the issue with large corporations sinking billions of dollars into trying to manipulate your behavior?

No, I can't. There are many things that influence my behaviour and that is low down on the list of influences that worry me. Even Hacker News is probably a worse influence than the average ad. What do you think is the problem here? And it isn't billions, you need to normalise by audience size. Any company spending billions to influence my behaviour is bankrupt, I don't have enough money for them to make that back.

Okay, so you actually can pick out the issue. You just don't mind being manipulated by corporations. Fine, but strange that the angle you took was "aw shucks geez guys I'm so confused about all this".

Re: Goodbye Brave

#196
post #159
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Then let people who believe that go stare at ads. Submitting yourself to manipulation out of a sense of duty to the viability of a business model is deeply weird. Alternatively, if you believe those ads don't affect you then why does it matter whether they're displayed in your browser or not?

I do see potential value in being informed by an ad of a type of product I didn’t know existed. The type of ads I strongly dislike for reasons beyond like, breaking pages and tracking, are ones that repeatedly show for something which I already know exists in order to promote a brand. If someone wants to put up an ad for “we make any bronze parts”, well, I looked to see if any of them were cheap enough to get as a ga…

If you didn't have a pre-existing desire for that product which led you to search out its existence then why was having the desire for it instilled in you a good thing? Why deliberately create the hole of dissatisfaction within yourself?

Re: Goodbye Brave

#197
post #188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IPv6 enables insane precission of device tracking. A side effect of not having enough ipv4 addresses and using NAT is that all your home devices let's say, go out on the internet using only a single IP address. Also, the geo-location accuracy using ipv4 is at the level of a city. With ipv6 you can get to a geolocation accuracy of a building block and confidently target individual devices within ones home network sinc…

>IPv6 enables insane precission of device tracking. A side effect of not having enough ipv4 addresses and using NAT is that all your home devices let's say, go out on the internet using only a single IP address Use random addresses, no further words needed. If you are actually that paranoid, feel free to use stateless translation to change the host part of the IP. >Also, the geo-location accuracy using ipv4 is at the…

So on the first part you are replying with i already said, that there will be workarounds, and om the second part you are replying with a condition that is half true and is most likely going to stop being true as years go by and ipv6 is adopted more and more. Not sure where this is going.

There are people who already use ipv6 on their routers/pcs/mobiles and they don't even know it.

Re: Goodbye Brave

#198

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Uphold (and Gemini) are required only for those who wish to KYC. Brave cannot act as a funnel for unchecked funds between large advertisers (e.g. Walmart, Amazon, Coinbase, etc.) and anonymous external wallets. If a user wishes to "cash out," Brave must comply with relevant AML laws and regulations. Note, this requirement only exists for uses who wish to "cash out" or deposit their own BAT, and only for the Brave Rew…

Hmm I understand. Some launchpads are using external KYC systems allowing for verification while using Metamask. I wish something like that would be possible. Lost funds weren't much to bother with. It was just, I had disabled "automatically pay to creators" option on all my devices, but I saw a transaction go out. Then I checked on reddit, and some other people had similar issues. I will still keep using Brave, no w…

Which external KYC options do you use and enjoy? I'd be more than happy to take a look and discuss them with our team for consideration.

Regarding lost funds, the only way Brave should ever make an automatic contribution when auto-contribute is disabled is if the contribution were queued up prior to disabling auto-contribute. You can check brave://rewards-internals/ (specifically the Contributions and Event Logs tabs) to compare timestamps to see if a contribution was processed after you disabled auto-contribute. Happy to help claw-back any rewards lost to a bug (if that be the case).

Whatever I can do to improve your experience with Brave; just let me know :)

Re: Goodbye Brave

#199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hmm I understand. Some launchpads are using external KYC systems allowing for verification while using Metamask. I wish something like that would be possible. Lost funds weren't much to bother with. It was just, I had disabled "automatically pay to creators" option on all my devices, but I saw a transaction go out. Then I checked on reddit, and some other people had similar issues. I will still keep using Brave, no w…

Which external KYC options do you use and enjoy? I'd be more than happy to take a look and discuss them with our team for consideration. Regarding lost funds, the only way Brave should ever make an automatic contribution when auto-contribute is disabled is if the contribution were queued up prior to disabling auto-contribute. You can check brave://rewards-internals/ (specifically the Contributions and Event Logs tabs…

KYC; For example KSMStarter, TruePNL, Thorstarter etc. send the user over to an external page to complete the KYC with selfie/id card/utility bill. Then you come back and login with your Metamask.

Auto contribution; Ah, I see. Thanks for explanation.

Re: Goodbye Brave

#200
post #65
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unfortunately I still see too many people use Adblock plus and the like which leads me to believe ublock origin lacks some sort of name or brand recognition with your average user

I think ABP+ was just first to mass market penetration, and people still associate it - ad blocker -> ad block plus.

ABP's purpose is in its name. If a layperson only knew uBO by it's name best case they'd be confused and worst case they'd think it's malware (even though it's phenomenal)
Post reply on HN